Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

27-07-2024

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery

Auteurs: Lisa A. Kachnic, Kathryn Winter, Mohan Suntharalingam, David Ilson, André Konski, Shane Lloyd, Sarah A. McAvoy, Thomas Lad, Olugbenga Gbenga Olowokure, Pamela Samson, Elizabeth M. Gore, Joshua E. Meyer, Gregory M. M. Videtic, David A. Clump, Adam Raben, Omar Kayaleh, Jerry Barker Jr., Michael G. Haddock, Judith O. Hopkins, Deborah W. Bruner

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose/objectives

NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR).

Materials/methods

Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6–8 weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ2 test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6–8 weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS.

Results

This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6–8 weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1 year. At 6–8 weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn’t have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1 year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74).

Conclusions

The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., et al. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(2), 69–90.CrossRef Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., et al. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(2), 69–90.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., et al. (2014). Cancer statistics 2014. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(1), 9–29.CrossRef Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., et al. (2014). Cancer statistics 2014. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(1), 9–29.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Herskovic, A., Martz, K., Al-Sarraf, M., et al. (1992). Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(24), 1593–1598.CrossRefPubMed Herskovic, A., Martz, K., Al-Sarraf, M., et al. (1992). Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(24), 1593–1598.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cooper, J. S., Guo, M. D., Herskovic, A., et al. (1999). Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85–01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA, 281(17), 1623–1627.CrossRefPubMed Cooper, J. S., Guo, M. D., Herskovic, A., et al. (1999). Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85–01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA, 281(17), 1623–1627.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Minsky, B. D., Pajak, T. F., Ginsberg, R. J., et al. (2002). Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90–12): INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94–05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: High-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(5), 1167–1174.CrossRefPubMed Minsky, B. D., Pajak, T. F., Ginsberg, R. J., et al. (2002). Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90–12): INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94–05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: High-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(5), 1167–1174.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kelsen, D. P., Winter, K. A., Gunderson, L. L., et al. (2007). Long-term results of RTOG Trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): A random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(24), 3719–3725.CrossRefPubMed Kelsen, D. P., Winter, K. A., Gunderson, L. L., et al. (2007). Long-term results of RTOG Trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): A random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(24), 3719–3725.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sarna, L., Swann, S., Langer, C., et al. (2008). Clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes with amifostine in combination with chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of RTOG 9801. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 72(5), 1378–1384.CrossRefPubMed Sarna, L., Swann, S., Langer, C., et al. (2008). Clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes with amifostine in combination with chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of RTOG 9801. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 72(5), 1378–1384.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bonner, J. A., Harari, P. M., Giralt, J., et al. (2010). Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-Year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncology, 11(1), 21–28.CrossRefPubMed Bonner, J. A., Harari, P. M., Giralt, J., et al. (2010). Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-Year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncology, 11(1), 21–28.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Safran, H., Suntharalingam, M., Dipetrillo, T., et al. (2008). Cetuximab with concurrent chemoradiation for esophagogastric cancer: Assessment of toxicity. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 70(2), 391–395.CrossRefPubMed Safran, H., Suntharalingam, M., Dipetrillo, T., et al. (2008). Cetuximab with concurrent chemoradiation for esophagogastric cancer: Assessment of toxicity. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 70(2), 391–395.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Suntharalingam, M., Winter, K., Ilson, D., et al. (2017). Effect of the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation therapy for patients with esophageal cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0436 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 3(11), 1520–1528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suntharalingam, M., Winter, K., Ilson, D., et al. (2017). Effect of the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation therapy for patients with esophageal cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0436 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 3(11), 1520–1528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Darling, G., Eton, D. T., Sulmann, J., et al. (2006). Validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy esophageal cancer subscale (FACT-E). Cancer, 107, 854–863.CrossRefPubMed Darling, G., Eton, D. T., Sulmann, J., et al. (2006). Validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy esophageal cancer subscale (FACT-E). Cancer, 107, 854–863.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Greene, F. L., American Joint Committee on Cancer, & American Cancer Society. (2002). AJCC cancer staging manual (6th ed.). Springer. Greene, F. L., American Joint Committee on Cancer, & American Cancer Society. (2002). AJCC cancer staging manual (6th ed.). Springer.
13.
go back to reference Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.CrossRefPubMed Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.
16.
go back to reference Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., van Grieken, N. C. T., Vogel, A., Smyth, E. C., & ESMO Guidelines Committee. (2016). Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 27, 50–57.CrossRef Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., van Grieken, N. C. T., Vogel, A., Smyth, E. C., & ESMO Guidelines Committee. (2016). Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 27, 50–57.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Avery, K. N., Metcalfe, C., Barham, C. P., et al. (2007). Quality of life during potentially curative treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 94(11), 369–1376.CrossRef Avery, K. N., Metcalfe, C., Barham, C. P., et al. (2007). Quality of life during potentially curative treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 94(11), 369–1376.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bedenne, L., Michel, P., Bouche, O., et al. (2007). Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(10), 1160–1168.CrossRefPubMed Bedenne, L., Michel, P., Bouche, O., et al. (2007). Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(10), 1160–1168.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yamashita, H., Okuma, K., Seto, Y., et al. (2009). A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life measures between definitive chemoradiation alone and radical surgery for clinical stage II–III esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 100(6), 435–441.CrossRefPubMed Yamashita, H., Okuma, K., Seto, Y., et al. (2009). A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life measures between definitive chemoradiation alone and radical surgery for clinical stage II–III esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 100(6), 435–441.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ariga, H., Nemoto, K., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2009). Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 75(2), 348–356.CrossRefPubMed Ariga, H., Nemoto, K., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2009). Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 75(2), 348–356.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jacobs, M., Macefield, R. C., Blazeby, J. M., et al. (2012). Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1787–1803.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs, M., Macefield, R. C., Blazeby, J. M., et al. (2012). Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1787–1803.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kachnic, L. A., Winter, K., Wasserman, T., et al. (2011). Longitudinal quality-of-life analysis of RTOG 94–05 (INT 0123): A phase III trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, 4(2), 45–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Kachnic, L. A., Winter, K., Wasserman, T., et al. (2011). Longitudinal quality-of-life analysis of RTOG 94–05 (INT 0123): A phase III trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, 4(2), 45–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Conroy, T., Galais, M.-P., Raoul, J.-L., et al. (2014). Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): Final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncology, 15(3), 305–314.CrossRefPubMed Conroy, T., Galais, M.-P., Raoul, J.-L., et al. (2014). Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): Final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncology, 15(3), 305–314.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Gourgou, S., Galais, M. P., et al. (2017). Health-related quality of life results from the PRODIGE 5/ACCORD 17 randomised trial of FOLFOX versus fluorouracil–cisplatin regimen in oesophageal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 84, 239–249.CrossRefPubMed Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Gourgou, S., Galais, M. P., et al. (2017). Health-related quality of life results from the PRODIGE 5/ACCORD 17 randomised trial of FOLFOX versus fluorouracil–cisplatin regimen in oesophageal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 84, 239–249.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Crosby, T., Hurt, C. N., Falk, S., et al. (2013). Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): A multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncology, 14(7), 627–637.CrossRefPubMed Crosby, T., Hurt, C. N., Falk, S., et al. (2013). Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): A multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncology, 14(7), 627–637.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rees, J., Hurt, C. N., Gollins, S., et al. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes during and after definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 113, 603–610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rees, J., Hurt, C. N., Gollins, S., et al. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes during and after definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 113, 603–610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Shapiro, J., van Lanschot, J. B., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., et al. (2015). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncology, 16(9), 1090–1098.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro, J., van Lanschot, J. B., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., et al. (2015). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncology, 16(9), 1090–1098.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Noordman, B. J., Verdam, M. G. E., Lagarde, S. M., et al. (2018). Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-related quality of life in esophageal or junctional cancer: Results from the randomized CROSS trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(3), 268–275.CrossRefPubMed Noordman, B. J., Verdam, M. G. E., Lagarde, S. M., et al. (2018). Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-related quality of life in esophageal or junctional cancer: Results from the randomized CROSS trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(3), 268–275.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery
Auteurs
Lisa A. Kachnic
Kathryn Winter
Mohan Suntharalingam
David Ilson
André Konski
Shane Lloyd
Sarah A. McAvoy
Thomas Lad
Olugbenga Gbenga Olowokure
Pamela Samson
Elizabeth M. Gore
Joshua E. Meyer
Gregory M. M. Videtic
David A. Clump
Adam Raben
Omar Kayaleh
Jerry Barker Jr.
Michael G. Haddock
Judith O. Hopkins
Deborah W. Bruner
Publicatiedatum
27-07-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03736-7