Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We report an investigation into processes of change in a randomized controlled trial of Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for families of children with cerebral palsy (CP). In comparison with the control group, the SSTP-only group showed improvements in child behavior problems and emotional symptoms and the SSTP-plus-ACT group showed benefits in child behavior problems, child hyperactivity, dysfunctional parenting styles, child functional performance in the mobility domain, child quality of life, and parental adjustment.
Sixty-seven parents of children with CP were randomly allocated to one of three groups: waitlist control, SSTP-only and SSTP-plus-ACT groups. We investigated three potential processes of change: parenting style, parental attitude to child emotion, and parental psychological flexibility. We used bootstrapping to perform the mediation analysis.
Contrary to the existing literature, we find that neither dysfunctional parenting styles nor parental attitude to child emotion were significant mediators of the intervention effect on child behavior and adjustment. Consistent with existing literature, we find that psychological flexibility mediates the intervention effect on dysfunctional parenting styles (overreactivity confidence interval [CI] = −0.4750 to −0.115) and parental adjustment (depressive symptoms CI = −6.5641 to −0.5922; stress CI = −6.0546 to −0.4195).
Overall, our findings support the conclusion that ACT makes a unique contribution to parenting intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (00336291).
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Arnold, D. S., O’Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5, 137–144. CrossRef
Boggs, S., Eyberg, S., & Reynolds, L. (1990). Concurrent validity of the Eyberg child behavior inventory. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 19(1), 75–78. CrossRef
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35(1), 79–89. CrossRef
Brown, F. L., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R. N., & McKinlay, L. (2015). Does stepping stones triple p plus acceptance and commitment therapy improve parent, couple and family adjustment following paediatric acquired brain injury? A randomised controlled trial. Behavior Research and Therapy, 73, 58–66. CrossRef
Coyne, L. W., & Wilson, K. G. (2004). The role of cognitive fusion in impaired parenting: an RFT analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(3), 469–486.
Dumas, J. E. (2005). Mindfulness-based parent training: strategies to lessen the grip of automaticity in families with disruptive children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34(4), 779–791. CrossRef
Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg child behavior inventory and Sutter-Eyberg student behavior inventory–revised: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Eyberg, S., & Ross, A. (1978). Assessment of child behavior problems: the validation of a new inventory. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 7(2), 113–116. CrossRef
Gardner, G., Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., & Whitaker, C. (2010). Who benefits and how does it work? Moderators and mediators of outcome in an effectiveness trail of a parenting intervention. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(4), 568–580. CrossRef
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hoover, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(3), 243–268. CrossRef
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hoover, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: how families communicate emotionally. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Halberstadt, A. G., Dunsmore, J. D., McElwain, N. M., Eaton, K. L., & McCool, A. (2001). Parents’ beliefs about negative emotions. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. [Unpublished questionnaire].
Halberstadt, A. G., Thompson, J. A., Parker, A. E., & Dunsmore, J. D. (2008). Parents’ emotion-related beliefs and behaviors in relation to children’s coping with the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. Infant and Child Development, 17, 557–580. CrossRef
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). ACT: model, processes and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. CrossRef
Hayes, S. C., Strosal, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2003). Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Katz, L. F., Wilson, B., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Meta-emotion philosophy and family adjustment: Making an emotional connection. In M. J. Cox & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), The advances in family research series. Conflict and cohesion in families: Causes and consequences (pp. 131–165). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lovibond, P. E., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. CrossRef
Murrell, A. R., Wilson, K. G., LaBorde, C. T., Drake, C. E., & Rogers, L. J. (2008). Relational responding in parents. Behavior Analyst Today, 9(3−4), 196–214. CrossRef
Ost, L.-G. (2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavior Research and Therapy, 46, 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005. CrossRef
Ruiz, F. J. (2010). A review of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 125–162.
Ruiz, F. J. (2012). ACT versus traditional cognitive behavioral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current empirical evidence. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12(2), 333–357.
Sanders, M. R., & Dadds, M. R. (1993). Behavioral family intervention. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sanders, M. R., Mazzucchelli, T., & Studman, L. (2003). Practitioner’s manual for standard Stepping Stones Triple P. Brisbane, Australia: Triple P International.
Sanders, M. R., Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Studman, L. J. (2009). Facilitator’s Manual for Group Stepping Stones Triple P for families with a child who has a disability. Brisbane, Australia: Triple P International.
Whittingham, K., Sanders, M. R., McKinlay, L., & Boyd, R. N. (2013). Stepping stones triple P and acceptance and commitment therapy for parents of children with cerebral palsy: trial protocol. Brain Impairment, 14(2), 270–280. CrossRef
Whittingham, K., Sofronoff, K., Sheffield, J. K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Stepping stones triple P: an RCT of a parenting program with parents of a child diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9285-x. CrossRefPubMed
- Parenting Intervention Combined with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Processes of Change
Matthew R. Sanders
Roslyn N. Boyd
- Springer US