Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

04-09-2020 | Original Paper

Parental Differential Treatment of Siblings and Fairness Perception: Moderating Role of Personality

Auteurs: Hamide Gozu, Joan Newman

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 11/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Family harmony is likely to be challenged if children perceive that their parents do not treat them and their siblings fairly. The direction of parental favor is related to an individual’s perception of fairness but does not fully explain it. The current study investigated whether personality traits moderated the relationship between parental differential treatment and fairness perception. A total of 762 undergraduates (aged between 18 and 25) completed the Big Five Inventory and nominated a ‘target sibling’ whom they considered as they completed the Sibling Inventory of Differential Experience and rated the fairness of parenting. Regression analyses showed that slightly more affection towards the participant and slightly more control over the target sibling were evaluated as most fair, whereas extremely unequal parental treatment (regardless of who was favored) was evaluated as very unfair. Of the Big Five personality traits, agreeableness, extraversion, and openness moderated the fairness perception of parental differential affection but not parental differential control. Favored individuals who were highly agreeable and open to novelty were less likely to rate affection preference as fair than favored individuals who were of low agreeableness and low openness. Also, individuals high on extraversion rated both extreme parental favor and disfavor as less fair than individuals who were low on extraversion. The current study highlights the importance of personality in the fairness perception of parental differential treatment. Implications for parents and family practitioners are provided.
Literatuur
go back to reference Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
go back to reference Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). AMOS 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation. Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). AMOS 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
go back to reference Arnett, J. J. (2017). Socialization in emerging adulthood: From the family to the wider world, from socialization to self socialization. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hasing (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 85–108). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Arnett, J. J. (2017). Socialization in emerging adulthood: From the family to the wider world, from socialization to self socialization. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hasing (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 85–108). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Baker, L. A., & Daniel, D. (1990). Nonshared environmental influences and personality differences in adult twins. Journal of Family Psychology, 58(1), 103–110. Baker, L. A., & Daniel, D. (1990). Nonshared environmental influences and personality differences in adult twins. Journal of Family Psychology, 58(1), 103–110.
go back to reference Camgöz, S. M., & Karapınar, P. B. (2011). Managing job satisfaction: The mediating effect of procedural fairness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 234–243. Camgöz, S. M., & Karapınar, P. B. (2011). Managing job satisfaction: The mediating effect of procedural fairness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 234–243.
go back to reference Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2003). Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2003). Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniels, D., Dunn, J., Furstenberg, F. F., & Plomin, R. (1985). Environmental differences within the family and adjustment differences within pairs of adolescent siblings. Child Development, 56(3), 764–774.CrossRef Daniels, D., Dunn, J., Furstenberg, F. F., & Plomin, R. (1985). Environmental differences within the family and adjustment differences within pairs of adolescent siblings. Child Development, 56(3), 764–774.CrossRef
go back to reference John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
go back to reference John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008).Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008).Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference John, O. P., & Srivasta, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. 2nd Ed. pp. (102–138). New York, NY: Guilford. John, O. P., & Srivasta, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. 2nd Ed. pp. (102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.
go back to reference Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages (Essays on moral development, V: 2). San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages (Essays on moral development, V: 2). San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.
go back to reference Lovas, L., & Wolt, R. (2002). Sensitivity to injustice in the context of some personality traits. Studia Psychologica, 44, 125–131. Lovas, L., & Wolt, R. (2002). Sensitivity to injustice in the context of some personality traits. Studia Psychologica, 44, 125–131.
go back to reference Žitný, P., & Halama, P. (2011). Self-esteem, locus of control and personality traits as predictors of sensitivity to injustice. Studia Psychologica, 53, 27–40. Žitný, P., & Halama, P. (2011). Self-esteem, locus of control and personality traits as predictors of sensitivity to injustice. Studia Psychologica, 53, 27–40.
Metagegevens
Titel
Parental Differential Treatment of Siblings and Fairness Perception: Moderating Role of Personality
Auteurs
Hamide Gozu
Joan Newman
Publicatiedatum
04-09-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 11/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01811-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2020

Journal of Child and Family Studies 11/2020 Naar de uitgave