Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Outsourcing control to the environment: effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection

Auteurs: Ulrich Mayr, Richard L. Bryck

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Response-time and accuracy costs as assessed in the context of the task-switching paradigm are usually thought to represent processes involved in the selection of abstract task sets. However, task sets are also applied to specific stimulus and response constellations, which in turn may become associated with task-set representations. To explore the consequence of such associations, we used a task-switching paradigm in which subjects had to select between two tasks (color or orientation discrimination) that were either associated with shared or unique stimulus/response locations on a touchscreen. When each task was associated with unique locations, error switch costs, stimulus–response congruency effects, as well as the characteristic task-switch × repetition-priming interaction were eliminated, and global selection costs were substantially reduced. These results demonstrate that to understand standard task-switching phenomena it is critical to consider links between lower level stimulus/response parameters and task sets.
Voetnoten
1
While this effect might suggest a speed-accuracy tradeoff, the critical error effect remained reliable, F(1,9)=5.3, P<0.05, after dropping six subjects with the largest reversed RT interaction (resulting in a near-zero RT interaction of 2 ms). Also, Table 1 indicates that the RT effect is mainly due to switch cost differences between the dual-object univalent and single-object univalent conditions. When the RT effect was analyzed for the bivalent condition alone, the relevant interaction was no longer present, F(1,15)=0.7, P>0.4, but still highly reliable for errors, F(1,15)=10.7, P<0.01. The larger RT switch cost in the univalent, dual-object condition may reflect increased demands of switching response locations that may be particularly pronounced in the overall faster univalent trials.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Switching intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV, (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Switching intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV, (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Awh, E., Sgarlata, A. M., Kliestik, J. (2005). Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: Online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (2), 192–206.CrossRef Awh, E., Sgarlata, A. M., Kliestik, J. (2005). Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: Online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (2), 192–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Bryck, R. L., Mayr, U. (2005). On the role of verbalization during task-set selection: Switching or serial order control? Memory and Cognition 33 (4), 611–623 Bryck, R. L., Mayr, U. (2005). On the role of verbalization during task-set selection: Switching or serial order control? Memory and Cognition 33 (4), 611–623
go back to reference Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 218–228.CrossRefPubMed Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 218–228.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research. This issue Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research. This issue
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89.
go back to reference Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 476–490. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 476–490.
go back to reference Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Marczinski, C. A., Milliken, B., & Nelson, S. (2003). Aging and repetition effects: Separate specific and nonspecific influences. Psychology and Aging, 18, 780–790.CrossRefPubMed Marczinski, C. A., Milliken, B., & Nelson, S. (2003). Aging and repetition effects: Separate specific and nonspecific influences. Psychology and Aging, 18, 780–790.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109.CrossRefPubMed Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. B. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (2), 337–350.PubMedCrossRef Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. B. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (2), 337–350.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mayr, U., & Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.CrossRef Mayr, U., & Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayr. U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362–372.PubMedCrossRef Mayr. U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362–372.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.CrossRef Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.CrossRef
go back to reference Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge: MIT Press. Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.CrossRef Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response–response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566–582CrossRefPubMed Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response–response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566–582CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.CrossRef Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.CrossRef
go back to reference Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.CrossRefPubMed Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wenke, D., Gaschler R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research. This issue Wenke, D., Gaschler R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research. This issue
Metagegevens
Titel
Outsourcing control to the environment: effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection
Auteurs
Ulrich Mayr
Richard L. Bryck
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Psychological Research 1/2007 Naar de uitgave