Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The Simon effect (prolonged RT when the task-irrelevant stimulus location is incongruent with the response side) has been reported to decrease at longer RTs, which is reflected in negative-going delta functions. This finding has been attributed to gradual dissipation of the response automatically activated by the task-irrelevant location information. The Diffusion Model for Conflict Tasks (DMC, Ulrich, Schröter, Leuthold, & Birngruber, Cognitive Psychology 78:148–174, 2015) formally specifies the time-course of this automatic activation process as a pulse-like function. In contrast to alternative views, DMC is consistent with the notion that this time-course is unaffected by the presentation duration of the target stimulus. Therefore, we expected that delta functions are invariant against changes of stimulus duration. This prediction was verified in two Simon task experiments. Consistent with this general result, DMC’s parameter τ which defines the time-course of the automatic response activation was estimated to not meaningfully differ between short and long durations. We argue that our results are coherent with processing architectures that assume a transient automatic process that is virtually unaffected by stimulus duration.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 495–523. CrossRef
Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 619–641. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hilldale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529–553.
de Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731–750.
Ellinghaus, R., & Miller, J. (in press). Delta plots with negative-going slopes as a potential marker of decreasing response activation in masked semantic priming. Psychological Research.
Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of Box’s results on the use of the F-distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 885–891. CrossRef
Heathcote, A., Popiel, S., & Mewhort, D. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340–347. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280–290. CrossRef
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 1.
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. CrossRef
Lu, C., & Proctor, R. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. CrossRef
Nelder, B. J. A., & Mead, R. (1964). A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal, 7, 308–313. CrossRef
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Consciousness & Self-Regulation, 4, 1–18.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 2013–2025. CrossRef
Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 242–266. CrossRef
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. CrossRef
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action, attention and performance XIX (pp. 494–519). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruthruff, E. (1996). A test of the deadline model for speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 56–64. CrossRef
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. CrossRef
Schwarz, W., & Miller, J. (2012). Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 555–574. CrossRef
Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind’s bottleneck. Plos Biology, 3, 334–349. CrossRef
Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22. CrossRef
Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251–260. CrossRef
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 915–928. PubMed
Xiong, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2016). Decreasing auditory Simon effects across reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 23–38. PubMed
Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543–1551.
- On the time-course of automatic response activation in the Simon task
Karin M. Bausenhart
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg