Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

03-04-2019 | Original Article

On the memory processes underlying conscious deliberation in complex decision making: the role of verbatim and gist memory

Auteurs: Marlène Abadie, Laurent Waroquier

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Studies showed that a distraction period improves complex decision making relative to a conscious deliberation period or an immediate choice. Although this counterintuitive finding was replicated several times, many other studies failed to find any beneficial effect of distraction and some even showed situations in which conscious deliberation was more effective. We suggest that studies showing a conscious thought advantage share several features that may have fostered the encoding and the retrieval of precise verbatim representations of the choice alternatives. The effectiveness of conscious deliberation could thus depend on the availability of verbatim memory. To test this hypothesis, we varied the availability of verbatim memory for the attributes of various equivalent alternatives by introducing, for half of the participants, a time delay between the presentation of the alternatives and of a fictitious client request that provides a normative criterion to evaluate them. Verbatim memory declined, whereas gist memory increased in the delay relative to the no delay condition. Moreover, there was a detrimental effect of delay in the deliberation condition but not in the distraction and the immediate decision conditions. Both verbatim memory and decision quality after deliberation were affected by the introduction of a delay which suggests that verbatim memory underlies conscious thought effectiveness.
Voetnoten
1
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
 
2
Note that memory and guessing parameters are computed per experimental condition in the present study. Hence, a mediation analysis between memory and decision quality cannot be tested.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abadie, M., Villejoubert, G., Waroquier, L., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). The interplay between presentation material and decision mode for complex choice preferences. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 682–691.CrossRef Abadie, M., Villejoubert, G., Waroquier, L., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). The interplay between presentation material and decision mode for complex choice preferences. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 682–691.CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie, M., & Waroquier, L. (2019). Evaluating the benefits of conscious and unconscious thought in complex decision-making. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,6, 72–78.CrossRef Abadie, M., & Waroquier, L. (2019). Evaluating the benefits of conscious and unconscious thought in complex decision-making. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,6, 72–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2013). Gist memory in the unconscious-thought effect. Psychological Science, 24, 1253–1259.CrossRef Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2013). Gist memory in the unconscious-thought effect. Psychological Science, 24, 1253–1259.CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2015). Information presentation format moderates the unconscious-thought effect: The role of recollection. Memory,24, 1123–1133.CrossRef Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2015). Information presentation format moderates the unconscious-thought effect: The role of recollection. Memory,24, 1123–1133.CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2017). The role of gist and verbatim memory in complex decision making: Explaining the unconscious-thought effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,43, 694–705.CrossRef Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2017). The role of gist and verbatim memory in complex decision making: Explaining the unconscious-thought effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,43, 694–705.CrossRef
go back to reference Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making,3, 292–303. Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making,3, 292–303.
go back to reference Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Aydin, C. (2010). Remembering in contradictory minds: disjunction fallacies in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,36, 711–735.CrossRef Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Aydin, C. (2010). Remembering in contradictory minds: disjunction fallacies in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,36, 711–735.CrossRef
go back to reference Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review,106, 160–179.CrossRef Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review,106, 160–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Damian, R. I., & Sherman, J. W. (2013). A process-dissociation examination of the cognitive processes underlying unconscious thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49, 228–237.CrossRef Damian, R. I., & Sherman, J. W. (2013). A process-dissociation examination of the cognitive processes underlying unconscious thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49, 228–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87, 586–598.CrossRef Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87, 586–598.CrossRef
go back to reference Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science,311, 1005–1007.CrossRef Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science,311, 1005–1007.CrossRef
go back to reference Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 95–109.CrossRef Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 95–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Dijksterhuis, A., & Strick, M. (2016). A case for thinking without consciousness. Perspectives on Psychological Science,11, 117–132.CrossRef Dijksterhuis, A., & Strick, M. (2016). A case for thinking without consciousness. Perspectives on Psychological Science,11, 117–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191.CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Huizenga, H. M., Wetzels, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Four empirical tests of unconscious thought theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,117, 332–340.CrossRef Huizenga, H. M., Wetzels, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Four empirical tests of unconscious thought theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,117, 332–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Jonides, J., Schumacher, E. H., Smith, E., Lauber, E. J., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R. A. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 462–475.CrossRef Jonides, J., Schumacher, E. H., Smith, E., Lauber, E. J., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R. A. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 462–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2011). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In A. Voss, C. Stahl, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), Cognitive methods in social psychology (pp. 331–354). La Rioja: Dialnet. Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2011). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In A. Voss, C. Stahl, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), Cognitive methods in social psychology (pp. 331–354). La Rioja: Dialnet.
go back to reference Li, J., Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Li, X., Zhang, M., & Shen, M. (2014). Bias or equality? Unconscious thought equally integrates temporally scattered information. Consciousness and Cognition,25, 77–87.CrossRef Li, J., Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Li, X., Zhang, M., & Shen, M. (2014). Bias or equality? Unconscious thought equally integrates temporally scattered information. Consciousness and Cognition,25, 77–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,37, 1–61.CrossRef Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,37, 1–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, J. C. H., & Rakow, T. (2008). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62, 707–732.CrossRef Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, J. C. H., & Rakow, T. (2008). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62, 707–732.CrossRef
go back to reference Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta- analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making,10, 1–17. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta- analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making,10, 1–17.
go back to reference Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychological Science,19, 1118–11123.CrossRef Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychological Science,19, 1118–11123.CrossRef
go back to reference Reyna, V. F. (2012). A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in fuzzy-trace theory. Judgment and Decision Making,7, 332–359.PubMedPubMedCentral Reyna, V. F. (2012). A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in fuzzy-trace theory. Judgment and Decision Making,7, 332–359.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Reyna, V. F. (2018). When irrational biases are smart: A fuzzy-trace theory of complex decision making. Journal of Intelligence,6, 1–16.CrossRef Reyna, V. F. (2018). When irrational biases are smart: A fuzzy-trace theory of complex decision making. Journal of Intelligence,6, 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences,7, 1–75.CrossRef Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences,7, 1–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30, 178–191.CrossRef Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30, 178–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,16, 225–237.CrossRef Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,16, 225–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,34, 570–586.CrossRef Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,34, 570–586.CrossRef
go back to reference Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdma, A., van Baaren, R. B., & Nordgren, L. F. (2011). A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Social Cognition,29, 738–762.CrossRef Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdma, A., van Baaren, R. B., & Nordgren, L. F. (2011). A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Social Cognition,29, 738–762.CrossRef
go back to reference Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. (2010). Unconscious-thought effects take place off-line, not on-line. Psychological Science,21, 484–488.CrossRef Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. (2010). Unconscious-thought effects take place off-line, not on-line. Psychological Science,21, 484–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Waroquier, L., Abadie, M., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2014). The effect of the cognitive demands of the distraction task on unconscious thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,37, 44–45.CrossRef Waroquier, L., Abadie, M., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2014). The effect of the cognitive demands of the distraction task on unconscious thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,37, 44–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the unconscious thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making,4, 601–610. Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the unconscious thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making,4, 601–610.
go back to reference Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your first impression? A reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science,1, 111–118.CrossRef Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your first impression? A reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science,1, 111–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language,46, 441–517.CrossRef Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language,46, 441–517.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
On the memory processes underlying conscious deliberation in complex decision making: the role of verbatim and gist memory
Auteurs
Marlène Abadie
Laurent Waroquier
Publicatiedatum
03-04-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01180-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2020

Psychological Research 6/2020 Naar de uitgave