Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention

Auteurs: Anna Wilschut, Jan Theeuwes, Christian N. L. Olivers

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Cueing a target by abrupt visual stimuli enhances its perception in a rapid but short-lived fashion, an effect known as transient attention. Our recent study showed that when targets are cued at a constant, central location, the emergence of the transient performance pattern was dependent on the presence of competing distractors, whereas targets presented in isolation were enhanced in a sustained manner (Wilschut et al., PLoS ONE, 6:e27661, 2011). The current study examined in more detail whether the transience depends on the specific nature of the competition. We first replicated and extended the competition-dependent transient pattern for peripheral and variable target locations. We then investigated the role of feature similarity, compatibility, and proximity. Both competition by feature similarity and compatibility between the target and distractors were found to impair performance, but effects were additive with the effects of the cueing interval and did not change the transient performance function. Varying the spatial distance between target and distractors yielded mixed evidence, but here too a transient pattern could be observed for targets flanked by both close and far distractors. The results thus show that the presence or absence of competition determines whether attention appears transient or sustained, while the specific nature of the competition (in terms of location or feature) affects selection independent of time.
Literatuur
go back to reference Andersen, S. K., Fuchs, S., & Müller, M. M. (2011). Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef Andersen, S. K., Fuchs, S., & Müller, M. M. (2011). Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Andersen, S. K., Müller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 9(6), 1–7.PubMedCrossRef Andersen, S. K., Müller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 9(6), 1–7.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162.PubMedCrossRef Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 764–787.PubMed Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 764–787.PubMed
go back to reference Benoni, H., & Tsal, Y. (2010). Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Vision Research, 50, 1292–1298.PubMedCrossRef Benoni, H., & Tsal, Y. (2010). Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Vision Research, 50, 1292–1298.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Breitmeyer, B. G., Kafaligönül, H., Öğmen, H., Mardon, L., Todd, S., & Ziegler, R. (2006). Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms. Vision Research, 46, 2645–2658.PubMedCrossRef Breitmeyer, B. G., Kafaligönül, H., Öğmen, H., Mardon, L., Todd, S., & Ziegler, R. (2006). Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms. Vision Research, 46, 2645–2658.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308–313.PubMedCrossRef Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308–313.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 1203–1215.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 1203–1215.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. L. (1997). Facilitatory or inhibitory nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 328–347.CrossRef Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. L. (1997). Facilitatory or inhibitory nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 328–347.CrossRef
go back to reference Chastain, G., Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. R. (1996). Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cueing paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(2), 300–309.PubMedCrossRef Chastain, G., Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. R. (1996). Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cueing paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(2), 300–309.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(4), 859–880.CrossRef Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(4), 859–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Dakin, S. C., Bex, P. J., Cass, J. R., & Watt, R. J. (2009). Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. Journal of Vision, 9(28), 1–16.PubMedCentral Dakin, S. C., Bex, P. J., Cass, J. R., & Watt, R. J. (2009). Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. Journal of Vision, 9(28), 1–16.PubMedCentral
go back to reference Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11(2), 139–146.PubMedCrossRef Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11(2), 139–146.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8(2), 135–139.CrossRef Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8(2), 135–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of target letters in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef Eriksen, B. A.,  & Eriksen, C. W.  (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of target letters in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 225–240.PubMedCrossRef Eriksen, C. W.,  & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 225–240.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 847–858.PubMed Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 847–858.PubMed
go back to reference Hayden, B. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2005). Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron, 47, 637–643.PubMedCrossRef Hayden, B. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2005). Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron, 47, 637–643.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337.PubMedCrossRef He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 35–50.CrossRef Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 35–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216.PubMedCrossRef Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Band, G. P. H., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 847–864.PubMedCrossRef Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Band, G. P. H., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 847–864.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jonikaitis, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2013). Dissociating oculomotor contributions to spatial and feature-based selection. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 1525–1534.PubMedCrossRef Jonikaitis, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2013). Dissociating oculomotor contributions to spatial and feature-based selection. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 1525–1534.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 510–522.PubMed Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 510–522.PubMed
go back to reference Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8(2), 255–279.PubMedCrossRef Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8(2), 255–279.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kristjánsson, Á., Mackeben, M., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception, 30, 1375–1387.PubMedCrossRef Kristjánsson, Á., Mackeben, M., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception, 30, 1375–1387.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20–55.PubMedCrossRef Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20–55.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Los, S. A., & Van der Burg, E. (2013). Sound speeds vision through preparation, not integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1612–1624.PubMed Los, S. A., & Van der Burg, E. (2013). Sound speeds vision through preparation, not integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1612–1624.PubMed
go back to reference Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre & J. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre & J. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 71, 77–91.PubMedCrossRef Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 71, 77–91.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Malania, M., Herzog, M. H., & Westheimer, G. (2007). Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. Journal of Vision, 7(1), 1–17.PubMedCrossRef Malania, M., Herzog, M. H., & Westheimer, G. (2007). Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. Journal of Vision, 7(1), 1–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Manassi, M., Sayim, B., & Herzog, M. H. (2012). Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 12(13), 1–14.CrossRef Manassi, M., Sayim, B., & Herzog, M. H. (2012). Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 12(13), 1–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Matthias, E., Bublak, P., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., Krummenacher, J., & Finke, K. (2010). The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 38–56.PubMed Matthias, E., Bublak, P., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., Krummenacher, J., & Finke, K. (2010). The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 38–56.PubMed
go back to reference Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64.
go back to reference Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69, 129–155.PubMedCrossRef Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69, 129–155.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330.PubMed Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330.PubMed
go back to reference Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.PubMedCrossRef Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631–1647.PubMedCrossRef Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631–1647.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 133–162.CrossRef Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 133–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78(5), 391–408.CrossRef Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78(5), 391–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.PubMedCrossRef Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., Rafal, R., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211–228.CrossRef Posner, M. I., Rafal, R., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 489–495.CrossRef Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 489–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006). Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 367–379.PubMedCrossRef Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006). Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 367–379.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Saarela, T. P., Sayim, B., Westheimer, G., & Herzog, M. H. (2009). Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 1–11.CrossRef Saarela, T. P., Sayim, B., Westheimer, G., & Herzog, M. H. (2009). Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Sayim, B., Westheimer, G., & Herzog, M. H. (2008). Contrast polarity, chromaticity, and stereoscopic depth modulate contextual interaction in vernier acuity. Journal of Vision, 8(12), 1–9.PubMedCrossRef Sayim, B., Westheimer, G., & Herzog, M. H. (2008). Contrast polarity, chromaticity, and stereoscopic depth modulate contextual interaction in vernier acuity. Journal of Vision, 8(12), 1–9.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments:time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type. Acta Psychologica, 122, 129–159.PubMedCrossRef Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments:time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type. Acta Psychologica, 122, 129–159.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scolari, M., Kohnen, A., Barton, B., & Awh, E. (2007). Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Journal of Vision, 7(7), 1–23.PubMedCrossRef Scolari, M., Kohnen, A., Barton, B., & Awh, E. (2007). Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Journal of Vision, 7(7), 1–23.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1037–1054. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1037–1054.
go back to reference Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity. Vision Research, 35(3), 337–343.PubMedCrossRef Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity. Vision Research, 35(3), 337–343.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological Review, 116(2), 283–317.PubMedCrossRef Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological Review, 116(2), 283–317.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. L., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2007). Attentional mechanisms in visual signal detection: the effects of simultaneous and delayed noise and pattern masks. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(7), 1093–1104.PubMedCrossRef Smith, P. L., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2007). Attentional mechanisms in visual signal detection: the effects of simultaneous and delayed noise and pattern masks. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(7), 1093–1104.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Strasburger, H. (2005). Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision, 5, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRef Strasburger, H. (2005). Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision, 5, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Strasburger, H., & Malania, M. (2013). Source confusion is a major cause of crowding. Journal of Vision, 13(24), 1–20. Strasburger, H., & Malania, M. (2013). Source confusion is a major cause of crowding. Journal of Vision, 13(24), 1–20.
go back to reference Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 443–463.PubMed Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 443–463.PubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.PubMedCrossRef Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception and Psychophysics, 33(6), 527–532.PubMedCrossRef Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception and Psychophysics, 33(6), 527–532.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tsal, Y., & Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1645–1656.PubMed Tsal, Y., & Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1645–1656.PubMed
go back to reference Van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 746–759.PubMed Van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 746–759.PubMed
go back to reference Vickery, T. J., Shim, W. M., Chakravarthi, R., Jiang, Y. V., & Luedeman, R. (2009). Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 1–15.PubMedCrossRef Vickery, T. J., Shim, W. M., Chakravarthi, R., Jiang, Y. V., & Luedeman, R. (2009). Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 1–15.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238(4828), 778–780.PubMedCrossRef Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238(4828), 778–780.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 160–168.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 160–168.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2013). Early perceptual interactions shape the time course of cueing. Acta Psychologica, 144, 40–50.PubMedCrossRef Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2013). Early perceptual interactions shape the time course of cueing. Acta Psychologica, 144, 40–50.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wright, R. D., & Richard, C. M. (2000). Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing. Vision Research, 40, 2351–2358.PubMedCrossRef Wright, R. D., & Richard, C. M. (2000). Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing. Vision Research, 40, 2351–2358.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 135–149.PubMed Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 135–149.PubMed
go back to reference Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10(16), 1–12. Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10(16), 1–12.
Metagegevens
Titel
Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention
Auteurs
Anna Wilschut
Jan Theeuwes
Christian N. L. Olivers
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0605-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2015

Psychological Research 5/2015 Naar de uitgave