Top

Gepubliceerd in:

08-11-2017

New resilience instrument for patients with cancer

Auteurs: Zeng Jie Ye, Mu Zi Liang, Peng Fei Li, Zhe Sun, Peng Chen, Guang Yun Hu, Yuan Liang Yu, Shu Ni Wang, Hong Zhong Qiu

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2018

Abstract

Objective

Resilience is an important concept in the cancer literature and is a salient indicator of cancer survivorship. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a new resilience instrument that is specific to patients with cancer diagnosis (RS-SC) in Mainland China.

Methods

First, a resilience framework was constructed for patients with cancer diagnosis. Second, items were formulated based on the framework to reflect different aspects of resilience. Third, two rounds of expert panel discussion were performed to select important and relevant items. Finally, two cross-sectional studies were conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of this instrument.

Results

Fifty-one items were generated based on the resilience framework and the final 25-item RS-SC resulted in a five-factor solution including Generic Elements, Benefit Finding, Support and Coping, Hope for the Future and Meaning for Existence, accounting for 64.72% of the variance. The Cronbach’s α of the RS-SC was 0.825 and the test–retest reliability was 0.874.

Conclusion

The RS-SC is a brief and specific self-report resilience instrument for Chinese patients with cancer and shows sound psychometric properties in this study. The RS-SC has potential applications in both clinical practice and research with strength-based resiliency interventions.

vorige artikel Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors

volgende artikel A method to create a standardized generic and condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure for patient care and healthcare improvement

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Garmezy, N., & Streitman, S. (1974). Children at risk: The search for the antecedents of schizophrenia: I. Conceptual models and research methods. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1(8), 14.CrossRef

Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., Loven, E., & Moller, C. (1984). Psychic factors determining the long-term adaptation of colostomy and ileostomy patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 41(3), 153–159.CrossRefPubMed

Hill, J., Holcombe, C., Clark, L., et al. (2011). Predictors of onset of depression and anxiety in the year after diagnosis of breast cancer. Psychological Medicine, 14(7), 1429–1436.CrossRef

Blows, E., Bird, L., Seymour, J., & Cox, K. (2012). Liminality as a framework for understanding the experience of cancer survivorship: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(10), 2155–2164.CrossRefPubMed

Ahern, N. R., Kiehl, E. M., Sole, M. L., et al. (2006). A review of instruments measuring resilience. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 29(2), 103–125.CrossRefPubMed

Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82.CrossRefPubMed

Deshields, T. L., Heiland, M. F., Kracen, A. C., et al. (2016). Resilience in adults with cancer: Development of a conceptual model. Psycho-Oncology, 25(1), 11–18.CrossRefPubMed

Earvolino-Ramirez, M. (2007). Resilience: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 42(2), 73–82.CrossRefPubMed

Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 147(6), 598–611.CrossRef

10.

Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.PubMed

11.

Sinclair, V. G., & Wallston, K. A. (2004). The development and psychometric evaluation of the brief resilient coping scale. Assess, 11(1), 94–101.CrossRef

12.

Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., et al. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 65–76.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2012). “Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why low socioeconomic status isn’t always bad for health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 135–158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Ye, Z. J., Liu, Q. C., & Liang, M. Z. (2016). The exploratory evaluation of Resilience Model for Breast Cancer (RM-BC) among patients with breast cancer diagnosis. Medicine and Philosophy, 12(B), 75–79.

15.

Ye, Z. J., Liang, M. Z., Qiu, H. Z., et al. (2016). Effect of a multidiscipline mentor-based program, Be Resilient to Breast Cancer (BRBC), on female breast cancer survivors in mainland China-A randomized, controlled, theoretically-derived intervention trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 158(3), 509–522.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Llewellyn, C. D., Horney, D. J., Mcgurk, M., et al. (2013). Assessing the psychological predictors of benefit finding in patients with head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22(1), 97–105.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Li, P. F., et al. (2017). Predicting changes in quality of life and emotional distress in Chinese patients with lung, gastric, and colon-rectal cancer diagnoses: the role of psychological resilience. Psycho-Oncology, 26(6), 829–835.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Li, M. Y., Yang, Y. L., Liu, L., et al. (2016). Effects of social support, hope and resilience on quality of life among Chinese bladder cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Pieters, H. C. (2015). “I’m still here”: Resilience among older survivors of breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 39(1), 20–28.

20.

Schumacher, A., Sauerland, C., Silling, G., et al. (2014). Resilience in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(2), 487–493.CrossRef

21.

Kumpfer, K. L. (1999). Factors and processes contributing to resilience: The resilience framework. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

22.

Seeman, T., Epel, E., Gruenewald, T., et al. (2010). Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: Cumulative allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 223–239.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Karlamangla, A. S., Singer, B. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2006). Reduction in allostatic load in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(3), 500–507.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Leung, C. M., Ho, S., & Kan, C. S. (1993). Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 40(1–4), 29–34.PubMed

25.

Sprangers, M. A., Cull, A., Bjordal, K., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 2(4), 287–295.CrossRef

26.

Qian, H. J., & Yuan, C. R. (2011). Validation of Chinese version of strategies used by people to promote health in Chinese cancer patients. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 46(1), 87–89.

27.

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.CrossRef

28.

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

29.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd edn.). New York: The Guilford Press.

30.

O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS, SAS, and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Reserach Methods, 32(3), 396–402.

31.

Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In Probelms and solutions in human assessment. Boston: Kluwer.

32.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

33.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2013). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. (8th edn.) Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

34.

Van, A. R., Bielderman, A., De, G. M., et al. (2015). Building from a conceptual model of the resilience process during ageing, towards the Groningen Aging Resilience Inventory.[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(9), 2208–2219.CrossRef

35.

Dienstbier, R. A. (1991). Behavioral correlates of sympathoadrenal reactivity: The toughness model. Medicine & Science in Sports Medicine, 23(7), 846–852.

36.

Healey, D., & Healey, H. (1998). The clinical pharmacologic profile of reboxetine: Does it involve the putative neurobiological substrates of wellbeing? Journal of Affective Disorders, 51(3), 313–322.CrossRef

37.

Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K., & Sen, S. (2011). The serotonin transporter promoter variant(5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression metaanalysis revisited: Evidence of genetic moderation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(5), 444–454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Liang, M. Z., et al. (2017) Effect of a mentor-based, supportive-expressive program, Be resilient to breast cancer, on survival in metastatic breast cancer—A randomized, controlled intervention trial. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.325.

39.

Barskova, T., & Oesterreich, R. (2009). Post-traumatic growth in people living with a serious medical condition and its relations to physical and mental health: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(21), 1709–1733.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2007). What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 671–682.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: New resilience instrument for patients with cancer
Auteurs: Zeng Jie Ye
Mu Zi Liang
Peng Fei Li
Zhe Sun
Peng Chen
Guang Yun Hu
Yuan Liang Yu
Shu Ni Wang
Hong Zhong Qiu
Publicatiedatum: 08-11-2017
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1736-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2018

Developing a patient-reported outcome measure for HIV care on perceived barriers to antiretroviral adherence: assessing the needs of HIV clinicians through qualitative analysis

An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model

Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer and their association with treatment, education, and demographic factors

International development of four EORTC disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, high- and low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction

Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial