Top

Psychological Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

18-01-2018 | Editorial

New perspectives on human multitasking

Auteurs: Edita Poljac, Andrea Kiesel, Iring Koch, Hermann Müller

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2018

Excerpt

Doing several things at the same time is an ability humans often rely on in their daily lives without truly giving it too much of notice. Scientific research, however, has informed us that this ability is all but a given, revealing its rather complex nature over the past years. Investigating the topic of human multitasking brings its own challenges, such as finding a proper way to specify what is meant by the term ‘task’, which is obviously a critical element for properly defining what is meant by ‘multi-tasks’. Here, we define multitasking as a condition in which cognitive processes belonging to two or more tasks overlap in time (c.f., Koch et al., 2017). Such a broad definition of multitasking is clearly beneficial as it includes a relatively wide range of research paradigms, such as those used to investigate dual tasking (for review see Pashler, 2000) and task switching (for review see Kiesel et al., 2010; Monsell, 2003; Vandierendonck, Liefooghe, & Verbruggen, 2010). The challenge, however, becomes evident when trying to investigate more complex (i.e., hierarchical or multi-step) tasks, for which one can question the level at which the actual tasks take place. …

volgende artikel What is a task? An ideomotor perspective

Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15(9), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x. CrossRefPubMed

Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.715. CrossRefPubMed

Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017). Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000309. PubMed

Hoffmann, J., Kiesel, A., & Sebald, A. (2003). Task switches under Go/NoGo conditions and the decomposition of switch costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440303602. CrossRef

Jiang, Y., Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Science, 15, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00690.x. CrossRefPubMed

Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842. CrossRefPubMed

Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(6), 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1474.

Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2017). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—an integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin. ( in press).

Kray, J., & Ferdinand, N. K. (2014). Task switching and aging. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 350–371). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

Lehle, C., & Huebner, R. (2009). Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(5), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0162-6. CrossRefPubMed

Luria, R., & Meiran, N. (2003). Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29(3), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.556.

Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.649. CrossRefPubMed

Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1423.

Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 273–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003. CrossRefPubMed

Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7. CrossRefPubMed

Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Poljac, E., De Haan, A. D., & Van Galen, G. P. V. (2006). Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.260. CrossRefPubMed

Poljac, E., Koch, I., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Dissociating restart costs and mixing costs in task switching. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0151-9. CrossRefPubMed

Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2005). Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661. CrossRefPubMed

Reissland, J., & Manzey, D. (2016). Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance. Acta Psychologica, 168, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.010. CrossRefPubMed

Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.

Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4(7), e220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040220. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: an event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050015-5. CrossRefPubMed

Töllner, T., Strobach, T., Schubert, T., & Müller, H. (2012). The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation? Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 75. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00075. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: New perspectives on human multitasking
Auteurs: Edita Poljac
Andrea Kiesel
Iring Koch
Hermann Müller
Publicatiedatum: 18-01-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0970-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Excerpt

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2018

Movement timing and cognitive control: adult-age differences in multi-tasking

The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate

“Optimal suppression” as a solution to the paradoxical cost of multitasking: examination of suppression specificity in task switching

Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm

Motor-cognitive dual-task performance: effects of a concurrent motor task on distinct components of visual processing capacity

Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality