Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

18-01-2018 | Editorial | Uitgave 1/2018

New perspectives on human multitasking

Tijdschrift:: Psychological Research > Uitgave 1/2018

Auteurs:: Edita Poljac, Andrea Kiesel, Iring Koch, Hermann Müller

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Without Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15(9), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x. CrossRefPubMed

Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.715. CrossRefPubMed

Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017). Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000309. PubMed

Hoffmann, J., Kiesel, A., & Sebald, A. (2003). Task switches under Go/NoGo conditions and the decomposition of switch costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440303602. CrossRef

Jiang, Y., Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Science, 15, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00690.x. CrossRefPubMed

Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842. CrossRefPubMed

Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(6), 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1474.

Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2017). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—an integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin. ( in press).

Kray, J., & Ferdinand, N. K. (2014). Task switching and aging. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 350–371). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

Lehle, C., & Huebner, R. (2009). Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(5), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0162-6. CrossRefPubMed

Luria, R., & Meiran, N. (2003). Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29(3), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.556.

Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.649. CrossRefPubMed

Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1423.

Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 273–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003. CrossRefPubMed

Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7. CrossRefPubMed

Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Poljac, E., De Haan, A. D., & Van Galen, G. P. V. (2006). Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.260. CrossRefPubMed

Poljac, E., Koch, I., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Dissociating restart costs and mixing costs in task switching. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0151-9. CrossRefPubMed

Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2005). Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661. CrossRefPubMed

Reissland, J., & Manzey, D. (2016). Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance. Acta Psychologica, 168, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.010. CrossRefPubMed

Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.

Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4(7), e220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040220. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: an event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050015-5. CrossRefPubMed

Töllner, T., Strobach, T., Schubert, T., & Müller, H. (2012). The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation? Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 75. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00075. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: New perspectives on human multitasking
Auteurs:: Edita Poljac
Andrea Kiesel
Iring Koch
Hermann Müller
Publicatiedatum: 18-01-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0970-2
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Tijdschrift: Psychological Research An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Uitgave 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Without Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2018

Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments

The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks

Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N − 2 repetition costs in task switching?

What is a task? An ideomotor perspective

Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm

Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?