Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Original Article

Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect

Auteur: Michael D. Dodd

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Three experiments are reported examining whether the presentation of irrelevant negative numbers at central fixation interacts with attentional orienting beyond fixation. It has been previously shown that number perception influences spatial attention, with the presentation of spatially nonpredictive numbers resulting in the allocation of attention to the left when the number is low (e.g., 1 or 2) and to the right when the number is high (e.g., 8 or 9). In the present experiment, it is examined whether this attentional spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is influenced by the presentation of negative numbers, which should have spatial properties that are in direct opposition to their positive counterparts (e.g., −1 or −2 would be considered high numbers relative to −8 or −9, which would be considered low numbers). Though the presentation of negative numbers does not lead to a reversal of the attentional SNARC effect, it does lead to an elimination of the effect, providing insight into how the attentional SNARC effect develops.
Voetnoten
1
I would like to thank Carlo Umiltà and two anonymous reviewers for these suggestions.
 
2
It is worth noting that these two possibilities could co-exist, though the failure to demonstrate a SNARC effect—or a reversed SNARC effect—seems somewhat inconsistent with the notion that there are shared processing pathways between numbers and spatial attention.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735.CrossRefPubMed Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 83–91.CrossRefPubMed Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 83–91.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101–117. Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101–117.
go back to reference Cohen Kadosh, R., Lammertyn, J., & Izard, V. (2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 132–147.CrossRefPubMed Cohen Kadosh, R., Lammertyn, J., & Izard, V. (2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 132–147.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRef Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., Leghari, M. A., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition, 108, 810–818.CrossRefPubMed Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., Leghari, M. A., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition, 108, 810–818.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dodd, M. D., & Wilson, D. (2009). Training attention: Interactions between central cues and reflexive attention. Visual Cognition, 17, 736–754.CrossRef Dodd, M. D., & Wilson, D. (2009). Training attention: Interactions between central cues and reflexive attention. Visual Cognition, 17, 736–754.CrossRef
go back to reference Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46, 67–71.CrossRefPubMed Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46, 67–71.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d’Ydewalle (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95–110. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d’Ydewalle (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95–110.
go back to reference Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57, 822–826.PubMed Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57, 822–826.PubMed
go back to reference Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.CrossRefPubMed Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fischer, M. H., & Rottmann, J. (2005). Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line? Psychology Science, 47, 22–32. Fischer, M. H., & Rottmann, J. (2005). Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line? Psychology Science, 47, 22–32.
go back to reference Galfano, G., Rasconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869–874. Galfano, G., Rasconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869–874.
go back to reference Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87–B95.CrossRefPubMed Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87–B95.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171–172.CrossRefPubMed Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171–172.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gibson, B. S., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622–627.CrossRefPubMed Gibson, B. S., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622–627.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., & Pinel, P. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448.CrossRefPubMed Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., & Pinel, P. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., & Chapman, H. L. (2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 925–945.CrossRefPubMed Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., & Chapman, H. L. (2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 925–945.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A. M., & Gevers, W. (2008). Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 413–418.CrossRef Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A. M., & Gevers, W. (2008). Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 413–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Nuerk, H.-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 835–863.PubMed Nuerk, H.-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 835–863.PubMed
go back to reference Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835–845.CrossRefPubMed Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835–845.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Price, M., & Mentzoni, R. (2008). Where is January? The month-SNARC effect in sequence-form synaesthetes. Cortex, 44, 890–907.CrossRefPubMed Price, M., & Mentzoni, R. (2008). Where is January? The month-SNARC effect in sequence-form synaesthetes. Cortex, 44, 890–907.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2002). Are the eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 507–513. Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2002). Are the eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 507–513.
go back to reference Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862–868. Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862–868.
go back to reference Shaki, S., & Petrusic, W. M. (2005). On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 931–937. Shaki, S., & Petrusic, W. M. (2005). On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 931–937.
go back to reference Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318. Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318.
go back to reference Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.CrossRefPubMed Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061–1067.CrossRefPubMed Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061–1067.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect
Auteur
Michael D. Dodd
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0283-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2011

Psychological Research 1/2011 Naar de uitgave

Editorial

Editorial