Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Multiplication facts and the mental number line: evidence from unbounded number line estimation

Auteurs: Regina M. Reinert, Stefan Huber, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Korbinian Moeller

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

A spatial representation of number magnitude, aka the mental number line, is considered one of the basic numerical representations. One way to assess it is number line estimation (e.g., positioning 43 on a number line ranging from 0 to 100). Recently, a new unbounded version of the number line estimation task was suggested: without labeled endpoints but a predefined unit, which was argued to provide a purer measure of spatial numerical representations. To further investigate the processes determining estimation performance in the unbounded number line task, we used an adapted version with variable units other than 1 to evaluate influences of (i) the size of a given unit and (ii) multiples of the units as target numbers on participants’ estimation pattern. We observed that estimations got faster and more accurate with increasing unit sizes. On the other hand, multiples of a predefined unit were estimated faster, but not more accurately than non-multiples. These results indicate an influence of multiplication fact knowledge on spatial numerical processing.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Please note that the results did not change substantially when using the absolute estimation error in pixels (instead of the relative measure of units) as the dependent variable.
 
2
Please note that the constant working window of about 10 we observed was not driven by the fact that 10 was the largest unit in the experiment. As recommended by Marc Brysbaert we conducted a control experiment in which 46 participants performed an unbounded number line estimation task with units 7 and 13 in a paper–pencil version of the task. Importantly, statistical evaluation of the resulting working windows indicated that it did not differ between unit size 7 and 13 [9.41 vs. 9.76, respectively, t(45) = 1.07, p = 0.32)] as well as from the mean working window over all unit sizes observed in the main experiment [unit size 7: t(45) = 0.43, p = 0.67; unit size 13: t(45) = 0.84, p = 0.41].
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2012). Cognitive processes of numerical estimation in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 246–267.PubMedCrossRef Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2012). Cognitive processes of numerical estimation in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 246–267.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Barth, H. C., & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14, 125–135.PubMedCrossRef Barth, H. C., & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14, 125–135.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Berteletti, I., Lucangeli, D., Piazza, M., Dehaene, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 46, 545–551.PubMedCrossRef Berteletti, I., Lucangeli, D., Piazza, M., Dehaene, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 46, 545–551.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 189–201.CrossRef Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 189–201.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, D. J., & Blanc-Goldhammer, D. (2011). Numerical bias in bounded and unbounded number line tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 331–338.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cohen, D. J., & Blanc-Goldhammer, D. (2011). Numerical bias in bounded and unbounded number line tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 331–338.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120.
go back to reference Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219–250.PubMedCrossRef Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219–250.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.PubMedCrossRef Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5- to 9-year old children: evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5- to 9-year old children: evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fuson, K. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of cumber. New York: Springer. Fuson, K. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of cumber. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74. Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
go back to reference Helmreich, I., Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2011). Language effects on children’s mental number line: how cross-cultural differences in number word systems affect spatial mappings of numbers in a non-verbal task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 598–613.CrossRef Helmreich, I., Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2011). Language effects on children’s mental number line: how cross-cultural differences in number word systems affect spatial mappings of numbers in a non-verbal task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 598–613.CrossRef
go back to reference Hollands, J. G., & Dyre, B. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: the cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107, 500–524.PubMedCrossRef Hollands, J. G., & Dyre, B. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: the cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107, 500–524.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lee, K. M., & Kang, S. Y. (2002). Arithmetic operation and working memory: differential suppression in dual tasks. Cognition, 83, B63–B68.PubMedCrossRef Lee, K. M., & Kang, S. Y. (2002). Arithmetic operation and working memory: differential suppression in dual tasks. Cognition, 83, B63–B68.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2009a). Eye fixation behaviour in the number bisection task: evidence for temporal specificity. Acta Psychologica, 131, 209–220.PubMedCrossRef Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2009a). Eye fixation behaviour in the number bisection task: evidence for temporal specificity. Acta Psychologica, 131, 209–220.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moeller, K., Klein, E., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2011b). Representation of multiplication facts: evidence for partial verbal coding. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7:25. Moeller, K., Klein, E., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2011b). Representation of multiplication facts: evidence for partial verbal coding. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7:25.
go back to reference Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Psychophysics of numerical representation: why seemingly logarithmic representations may rather be multi-linear. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219, 64–70.CrossRef Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Psychophysics of numerical representation: why seemingly logarithmic representations may rather be multi-linear. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219, 64–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009b). Children’s early mental number line: logarithmic or rather decomposed linear? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 503–515.PubMedCrossRef Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009b). Children’s early mental number line: logarithmic or rather decomposed linear? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 503–515.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nuerk, H.-C., Geppert, B. E., van Herten, M., & Willmes, K. (2002). On the impact of different number representations in the number bisection task. Cortex, 38, 691–715.PubMedCrossRef Nuerk, H.-C., Geppert, B. E., van Herten, M., & Willmes, K. (2002). On the impact of different number representations in the number bisection task. Cortex, 38, 691–715.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line: a review of multi-digit number processing. Journal of Psychology, 219, 3–22. Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line: a review of multi-digit number processing. Journal of Psychology, 219, 3–22.
go back to reference Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting tens and units back into different bins. Cognition, 82, B25–B33.PubMedCrossRef Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting tens and units back into different bins. Cognition, 82, B25–B33.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Representational change and children’s numerical estimation. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 169–195.PubMedCrossRef Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Representational change and children’s numerical estimation. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 169–195.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Price, A. J. (2001). Atomistic and holistic approaches to the early primary mathematics curriculum for addition. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th PME International Conference, 4, 73–80. Price, A. J. (2001). Atomistic and holistic approaches to the early primary mathematics curriculum for addition. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th PME International Conference, 4, 73–80.
go back to reference Rusconi, E., Galfano, G., Speriani, V., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Capacity and contextual constraints on product activation: evidence from task-irrelevant fact retrieval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1485–1511.CrossRef Rusconi, E., Galfano, G., Speriani, V., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Capacity and contextual constraints on product activation: evidence from task-irrelevant fact retrieval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1485–1511.CrossRef
go back to reference Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.PubMedCrossRef Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.PubMedCrossRef Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Slusser, E., Santiago, R., & Barth, H. (2013). Developmental change in numerical estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 193–208.CrossRef Slusser, E., Santiago, R., & Barth, H. (2013). Developmental change in numerical estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 193–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 683–692.PubMed Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 683–692.PubMed
go back to reference Sullivan, J., Juhasz, B., Slattery, T., & Barth, H. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 557–563.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sullivan, J., Juhasz, B., Slattery, T., & Barth, H. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 557–563.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Geppert, B., Schnitker, R., Weber, J., et al. (2008). All for one but not one for all: how multiple number representations are recruited in one numerical task. Brain Research, 1187, 154–166.PubMedCrossRef Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Geppert, B., Schnitker, R., Weber, J., et al. (2008). All for one but not one for all: how multiple number representations are recruited in one numerical task. Brain Research, 1187, 154–166.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Multiplication facts and the mental number line: evidence from unbounded number line estimation
Auteurs
Regina M. Reinert
Stefan Huber
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Korbinian Moeller
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0538-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Psychological Research 1/2015 Naar de uitgave