Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0837-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Claire L. Simons and Oliver Rivero-Arias are joint lead authors.
Missing data are a well-known and widely documented problem in cost-effectiveness analyses alongside clinical trials using individual patient-level data. Current methodological research recommends multiple imputation (MI) to deal with missing health outcome data, but there is little guidance on whether MI for multi-attribute questionnaires, such as the EQ-5D-3L, should be carried out at domain or at summary score level. In this paper, we evaluated the impact of imputing individual domains versus imputing index values to deal with missing EQ-5D-3L data using a simulation study and developed recommendations for future practice.
We simulated missing data in a patient-level dataset with complete EQ-5D-3L data at one point in time from a large multinational clinical trial (n = 1,814). Different proportions of missing data were generated using a missing at random (MAR) mechanism and three different scenarios were studied. The performance of using each method was evaluated using root mean squared error and mean absolute error of the actual versus predicted EQ-5D-3L indices.
In large sample sizes (n > 500) and a missing data pattern that follows mainly unit non-response, imputing domains or the index produced similar results. However, domain imputation became more accurate than index imputation with pattern of missingness following an item non-response. For smaller sample sizes (n < 100), index imputation was more accurate. When MI models were misspecified, both domain and index imputations were inaccurate for any proportion of missing data.
The decision between imputing the domains or the EQ-5D-3L index scores depends on the observed missing data pattern and the sample size available for analysis. Analysts conducting this type of exercises should also evaluate the sensitivity of the analysis to the MAR assumption and whether the imputation model is correctly specified.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)11136_2014_837_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Faria, R., Gomes, M., Epstein, D., & White, I. R. (2014). A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0193-3.
Little, R. J. & D. B. Rubin. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
EuroQol, G. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208. CrossRef
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Szende, A., M. Oppe, & N. Devlin.(2007). EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. A. Szende, M. Oppe, and N. Devlin. (Eds.) Dordrecht: Springer.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. (2011). Stata Press: College Station. TX: StataCorp LP.
Molyneux, A., Kerr, R., Stratton, I., Sandercock, P., Clarke, M., Shrimpton, J., et al. (2002). International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised trial. Lancet, 360(9342), 1267–1274. CrossRefPubMed
EuroQol Research Foundation (2014). Available from http://www.euroqol.org/. [Accessed 14 September 2014].
Van Buuren, S., Brand, J. P. L., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M., & Rubin, D. B. (2006). Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 76(12), 1049–1064. CrossRef
Fairbank, J., Frost, H., Wilson-MacDonald, J., Yu, L. M., Barker, K., & Collins, R. (2005). Spine stabilisation trial. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: The MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ, 330(7502), 1233. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Trial Group, K. A. T. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 91(1), 134–141. CrossRef
Kendrick, T., Simons, L., Mynors-Wallis, L., Gray, A., Lathlean, J., Pickering, R., et al. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of referral for generic care or problem-solving treatment from community mental health nurses, compared with usual general practitioner care for common mental disorders: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 50–59. CrossRefPubMed
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Efron, B. (1979). The 1977 rietz lecture—bootstrap methods—another look at the Jackknife. The annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26.
Kind, P., Hardman, G., & Macran, S. (1999). UK population norms for EQ-5D. UK: Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. London: Sage.
Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B-Statistical Methodology, 31(2), 350–371.
- Multiple imputation to deal with missing EQ-5D-3L data: Should we impute individual domains or the actual index?
Claire L. Simons
- Springer International Publishing