Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This study was carried out as part of a PhD dissertation by Zipi Rhein at Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
The present study attempts to characterize the contextual conditions (i.e., addition versus omission of elements) that enable or prevent transfer of an acquired skill. The effect of learning and transfer from part-to-whole and from whole-to-part was studied with the serial reaction time (SRT) task. In this study, two alternative sequences of the SRT task were utilized, a short (i.e., ‘part’) sequence consisting of six elements (ADBACD), and a long (i.e., ‘whole’) one consisting of 12 elements (BDCADBACDABC) in which the short sequence was embedded. Three groups participated in the study: one was trained with the ‘whole’ sequence and two with the ‘part’ sequence (differing in the number of initial training trials performed), for six blocks followed by a random block. Then, for an additional block, each group was divided into two subgroups, one which continued to practice the same sequence, while the other was transferred to the alternate sequence (i.e., ‘part-to-whole’ and ‘whole-to-part’). Results indicated that the group that first practiced the ‘whole’ and then the ‘part’ sequence showed full transfer, while the other group showed only partial transfer from the ‘part’ to ‘whole’ sequence. The findings of the present study are inconsistent with Thorndike’s principle of identical elements, and, instead, indicate that full transfer is enabled in spite of certain contextual changes (i.e., omissions), but only partial transfer is enabled when other changes are applied (i.e., additions).
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M. F. L., De Kleine, E., & Verwey, W. B. (2013). Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–16. CrossRef
Abrahamse, E. L., & Verwey, W. B. (2008). Context dependent learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 72, 397–404.
Adi-Japha, E., Karni, A., Parnes, A., Loewenschuss, I., & Vakil. E. (2008). A shift in task routines during the learning of a motor skill: group averaged data may mask critical phases in the individuals’ acquisition of skilled performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1544–1551. CrossRef
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406. CrossRef
Clawson, D. M., Healy, A. F., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (2001). Retention and transfer of Morse code reception skill by novices: Part-whole training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 129–142. PubMed
Fitts, P. M. (1964). Perceptual - motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.
Jiménez, L. (2008). Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? Psychological Research, 72, 387–396. CrossRef
Jiménez, L., Méndez, A., Pasquali, A., Abrahamse, E. L., & Verwey, W. B. (2011). Chunking by colors: Assessing discrete learning in a continuous serial reaction-time task. Acta Psychologica, 137, 318–329. CrossRef
Karni, A., Meyer, G., Rey-Hipolito, C., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 861–868. CrossRef
Mattoon, J. S. (1994). Designing instructional simulations: Effects of instructional control and type of training task on developing display-interpretation skills. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 189–209. CrossRef
Muller, B. (1999). Use specificity of cognitive skills: Evidence for production rules? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 191–207.
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32. CrossRef
Park, J. H., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Part-whole practice of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 51–61. CrossRef
Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Clark, K., Stewart, M., Massaquoi, S., Lou, J.-S., & Hallett, M. (1993). Procedural learning in Parkinson’s disease and cerebellar degeneration. Annual Neurology, 34, 594–602. CrossRef
Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.
Ruitenberg, M. F. L., Abrahamse, E. L., De Kleine, E., & Verwey, W. B. (2012a). Context-dependent motor skill: Perceptual processing in memory-based sequence production. Experimental Brain Research, 222, 31–40.
Ruitenberg, M. F. L., De Kleine, E., Van der Lubbe, R. H., Verwey, W. B., & Abrahamse, E. L. (2012b). Context-dependent motor skill and the role of practice. Psychological Research, 76, 812–820.
Ruitenberg, M. F. L., Verwey, W. B., & Abrahamse, E. L. (2015). What determines the impact of context on sequential action? Human Movement Science, 40, 298–314. CrossRef
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: a problem-based learning approach (4th edn.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Speelman, C. P., & Kirsner, K. (2001). Predicting transfer from training performance. Acta Psychological, 108, 247–281. CrossRef
Vakil, E., Karni, A., & Loewenschuss, I. (2002). Time delay and transfer in different stages of learning the tower of Hanoi. 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
Verwey, W. B. (2003). Effect of sequence length on the execution of familiar keying sequences: Lasting segmentations and preparation? Journal of Motor and Behavior, 35, 343–354. CrossRef
Verwey, W. B. (2003a). Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences. Psychological Research, 67, 106–122.
Verwey, W. B., & Dronkert, Y. (1996). Practicing a structured continuous key-pressing task: Motor chunking or rhythm consolidation? Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 71–79. CrossRef
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1047–1060. PubMed
- Motor sequence learning and the effect of context on transfer from part-to-whole and from whole-to-part
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg