Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2012 | Oral presentation | bijlage 1/2012 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2012

Motion of the rearfoot, ankle and subtalar joints and ankle moments when wearing lateral wedge insoles – results from bone anchored markers

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > bijlage 1/2012
Auteurs:
Richard Jones, Chris Nester, Anmin Liu, Peter Wolf, Anton Arndt, Paul Lundgren, Arne Lundberg

Background

Knee osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition and increased dynamic loading at the knee has been linked with increased progression of the disease. Lateral wedge insoles have been used in clinical practice since the late 1980s. It is theorised that lateral wedge insoles increase the subtalar joint valgus orientation and increase the ankle valgus moment [ 1], with subsequent reduced knee varus moments [ 2]. Results have shown that both clinical success and reductions in knee loading vary between people. Differences could be due to person specific foot biomechanics. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in frontal plane foot and ankle motion and moment due to a lateral wedge orthosis.

Materials and methods

Five healthy individuals participated in the study (age, height). An intracortical pin approach to measurement of foot motion was adopted because it enables effects of the orthosis at the individual ankle and subtalar joints to be identified. Accordingly, 1.2 mm intracortical pins were inserted into 9 bones of the foot and leg under local anaesthesia and reflective markers attached to the pins. Individuals walked over a force platform ten times in a control shoe condition and the Salford Lateral Wedge Technology insole™. All data were normalised to stance phase. Orthotic effect was evaluated using motions between tibia-talus, talus-calcaneus, and tibia-calcaneus during the first 50% of stance phase.

Results

Table 1
Raw changes in three segments (-ve change degs = increased eversion) and ankle moment (negative change = increased eversion moment nm/kg) in the 5 individuals compared to control condition.
 
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Tibia-talus y
-2.91
-1.18
-1.71
-1.14
-3.81
Talo-calcaneal y
-4.27
-1.96
-6.04
-2.34
-2.94
Tibia-calcaneal
-1.19
-2.15
-4.54
-1.90
-1.19
Ankle joint coronal moment
-0.09
-0.02
XX
-0.05
-0.06

Conclusions

Although the lateral wedge insole offers a change in the ankle valgus moment, each person’s kinematic response varied (Table 1). This demonstrates that the motions do not occur at one segment as per previous research [ 1] and therefore other motions in adjacent joints needs to be considered. This is potentially one of the reasons why some people do not respond to the orthosis and suggests that use of biomechanical foot classifications could enable more targeted use of lateral wedge insoles [ 3].
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen bijlage 1/2012

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2012 Naar de uitgave