Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Rigorous evaluation of early childhood interventions requires accurate and efficient measurement. Researchers commonly use parent-reported surveys or direct observations; both of which have inherent strengths and limitations. Existing attempts to understand the correspondence between these methods have been primarily quantitative in design. Little is known about parents’ unique, subjective experiences of parent-reported surveys and direct parent-child observations. In this paper, we describe the experiences of ten mothers of children aged 24 months, recruited from a randomised controlled trial of a nurse home visiting program for mothers at risk of experiencing social adversity. After completing both a survey and video-recorded parent-child observation, mothers participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews which were analysed thematically. Mothers voiced concerns about how researchers may view their parenting skills, and their child’s behaviour and development. Contrary to previous quantitative evidence, mothers reported parent and child behavioural change, which they attributed to the researcher’s presence. Mothers described how the structured requirements of the observation contributed to forced and unnatural interactions. The survey was viewed as a welcome opportunity to reflect on parenting skills, the parent-child relationship and the child’s development. Mothers identified practical strategies for minimising parent-child discomfort during video-recorded observations, such as the researcher averting their gaze or stepping out of the room. We highlight opportunities for enhanced data validity in research and clinical settings, strengthened participant engagement, and minimisation of participant discomfort. Given the exploratory nature of this study, we do not claim that results are necessarily generalisable to other parent or general populations. Further research is warranted to build the evidence regarding parent participation in early childhood research.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ablewhite, J., Kendrick, D., Watson, M., & Shaw, I. (2015). The other side of the story – maternal perceptions of safety advice and information: A qualitative approach. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), 1106–1113. doi: 10.1111/cch.12224.
Antal, H., Hossain, M. J., Hassink, S., Henry, S., Fuzzell, L., Taylor, A., & Wysocki, T. (2015). Audio-video recording of health care encounters for pediatric chronic conditions: Observational reactivity and its correlates. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(1), 144–153. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu046. CrossRefPubMed
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001. Accessed 5 May 2016.
Australian Early Development Census (2016). 2015 AEDC national report. https://www.aedc.gov.au/. Accessed 16 February 2017.
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72.
Bennetts, S. K., Mensah, F. K., Westrupp, E. M., Hackworth, N. J., & Reilly, S. (2016). The agreement between parent-reported and directly measured child language and parenting behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1710). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01710.
DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Albert, N. B., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choking under pressure: Multiple routes to skill failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 390. CrossRef
Feeley, N., Cossette, S., Côté, J., Héon, M., Stremler, R., Martorella, G., & Purden, M. (2009). The importance of piloting an RCT intervention. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 41(2), 84–99.
Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S., & Reznick, S. J. (2000). Short-form versions of the MacArthur communicative development inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(01), 95–116. CrossRef
Gimmig, D., Huguet, P., Caverni, J., & Cury, F. (2006). Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: When performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1005–1010. CrossRef
Goldfeld, S., Price, A., Bryson, H., Bruce, T., Mensah, F., Orsini, F., et al. (2017). “right@home”: A randomised controlled trial of sustained nurse home visiting from pregnancy to child age 2 years, versus usual care, to improve parent care, parent responsivity and the home learning environment at 2 years. BMJ Open, 7(3), e013307.
Jacob, T., Tennenbaum, D., Seilhamer, R. A., Bargiel, K., & Sharon, T. (1994). Reactivity effects during naturalistic observation of distressed and nondistressed families. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(3), 354. CrossRef
Jewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research. NCRM Working Paper. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/4/NCRM_workingpaper_0312.pdf.
Matata, B. M., Hinder, S., Steele, S., Gibbons, E., & Jackson, M. (2013). Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the english national health service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions. SAGE Open Medicine, 1. doi: 10.1177/2050312113503956.
Nicholson, J. M., Cann, W., Matthews, J., Berthelsen, D., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Trajanovska, M., et al. (2016). Enhancing the early home learning environment through a brief group parenting intervention: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatrics, 16(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0610-1. CrossRef
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science & Medicine, 42(5), 759–768. CrossRef
Russell, A., Russell, G., & Midwinter, D. (1992). Observer influences on mothers and fathers: Self-reported influence during a home observation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(2), 263–283.
Semeniuk, Y. Y., & Riesch, S. K. (2011). Analysis of participant reactivity in dyads performing a videotaped conflict-management task. ISRN Nursing, 2011, 1–6. doi: 10.5402/2011/596820.
Thornberry, T. J. (2013). “Why don’t you act like this at home?!” Parent and child reactivity during in-home dyadic parent-child interaction coding system (DPICS) coded observations. Auburn, AL: Auburn University. (PhD).
- Mothers’ Experiences of Parent-Reported and Video-Recorded Observational Assessments
Shannon K. Bennetts
Fiona K. Mensah
Naomi J. Hackworth
Elizabeth M. Westrupp
- Springer US