Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence 9/2019

05-07-2019 | Empirical Research

Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms

Auteurs: Kevin C. Runions, Thérèse Shaw, Kay Bussey, Robert Thornberg, Christina Salmivalli, Donna S. Cross

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 9/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The vast majority of adolescents recognize that bullying is morally wrong, yet bullying remains a problem in secondary schools, indicating young people may disengage from their moral values to engage in bullying. But it is unclear whether the same mechanisms enabling moral disengagement are active for bully/victims (who both bully and are bullied) as for pure bullies (who are not targets of bullying). This study tested the hypotheses that mechanisms of moral disengagement, including blaming the victim and minimizing the impact of bullying, may operate differently in bully/victims compared to pure bullies. From a sample of 1895 students from grades 7–9 (50.6% female; 83.4% from English speaking homes), 1870 provided self-reports on bullying involvement and mechanisms of moral disengagement associated with bullying. Two cut-offs were compared for bullying involvement (as perpetrator and as target of bullying) during the previous school term: a conservative cut-off (every few weeks or more often) and a liberal cut-off (once-or-twice). Using the conservative cut-off, both pure bullies and bully/victims enlisted moral disengagement mechanisms to justify bullying more than did uninvolved students and pure victims, with no significant difference in scores on any of the moral disengagement scales between pure bullies and bully/victims. For the liberal cut-off, bully/victims reported lower overall moral disengagement scores than did pure bullies, and specifically less distortion of consequences, diffusion of responsibility, and euphemistic labeling. This study advances bullying research by extending the role of moral disengagement in bullying episodes beyond pure bullies to victims, both pure victims and bully/victims. Examination of specific moral disengagement mechanisms and the extent of involvement in bullying enabled a more nuanced differentiation between the bullying groups. These results will inform future interventions aimed at reducing the use of moral disengagement mechanisms that sustain bullying and victimization. Targeted interventions are needed to challenge specific moral disengagement mechanisms from the perspectives of pure bullies and bully/victims.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bao, Z., Zhang, W., Lai, X., Sun, W., & Wang, Y. (2015). Parental attachment and Chinese adolescents’ delinquency: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 37–47.CrossRefPubMed Bao, Z., Zhang, W., Lai, X., Sun, W., & Wang, Y. (2015). Parental attachment and Chinese adolescents’ delinquency: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 37–47.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Garner, P. W., & Hinton, T. S. (2010). Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: associations with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(6), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1057.CrossRef Garner, P. W., & Hinton, T. S. (2010). Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: associations with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(6), 480–496. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​casp.​1057.CrossRef
go back to reference Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, R. A., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: a framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 33–45. Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, R. A., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: a framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 33–45.
go back to reference Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: a cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10060.CrossRef Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: a cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 515–530. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ab.​10060.CrossRef
go back to reference Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema (Ed.), Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol 9 (pp. 751–780). Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema (Ed.), Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol 9 (pp. 751–780).
go back to reference Pennell, D., Campbell, M.A., Tangen, D., Runions, K., Brooks, J., & Cross D.S. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of motivational interviewing (MI) for bullying perpetration in school settings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12502. Pennell, D., Campbell, M.A., Tangen, D., Runions, K., Brooks, J., & Cross D.S. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of motivational interviewing (MI) for bullying perpetration in school settings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​sjop.​12502.
go back to reference Runions, K. C., Salmivalli, C., Shaw, T., Burns, S., & Cross, D. (2018). Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21770.CrossRef Runions, K. C., Salmivalli, C., Shaw, T., Burns, S., & Cross, D. (2018). Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 501–511. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ab.​21770.CrossRef
go back to reference Sigurdson, J. F., Undheim, A. M., & Sund, A. M. (2015). Bulling involvement in early adolescence years: impact on mental health problems, psychosocial adjustment and use of services in adulthood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, S28–S28. Sigurdson, J. F., Undheim, A. M., & Sund, A. M. (2015). Bulling involvement in early adolescence years: impact on mental health problems, psychosocial adjustment and use of services in adulthood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, S28–S28.
Metagegevens
Titel
Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms
Auteurs
Kevin C. Runions
Thérèse Shaw
Kay Bussey
Robert Thornberg
Christina Salmivalli
Donna S. Cross
Publicatiedatum
05-07-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2019

Journal of Youth and Adolescence 9/2019 Naar de uitgave