Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2021 | Original Article

Money Versus Social Rank: An Empirical Investigation of Unfairness in Social Anxiety

Auteurs: Andreea Bică, Romeo Z. Crețu, Ioana R. Podina

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Background

Social anxiety (SA) is characterized by marked difficulties in forming and maintaining social relationships. Several theoretical perspectives suggest that individuals with social anxiety tend to prioritize social rank goals. As such, the socially anxious view the world in hierarchical rather than cooperative terms.

Methods

One hundred and eleven participants were assigned to one of three subgroups based on SA severity and depressed mood. The resulting subgroups consisted of participants with elevated levels of SA, with and without depressed mood (n = 46 and n = 24, respectively) as well as non-anxious participants (n = 41). By using an asymmetrical Ultimatum Game (UG) in which participants’ identities were concealed, we sought to investigate how SA levels modulate behavioural responses to unfair treatment and to subsequent fairness considerations.

Results

Overall, SA was associated with higher rejection rates of unfair splits, which suggests that participants with elevated SA prioritize fairness over financial maximization. Our findings also show that SA was associated with a tendency toward costly punishment, that is, both SA subgroups engaged in more punitive actions in spite of financial loss.

Conclusion

Taken together, our findings show that given the chance, individuals with elevated SA can resort to active punishment instead than acting submissively in asymmetric interactions, in partial disagreement with theoretical models of SA. We further advance that social rank threats are important drivers of punitive actions in SA. Empirical and practical implications, as well as interpretative caveats, are discussed.

vorige artikel Social Anxiety Disorder and the Fear of Death: An Empirical Investigation of the Terror Management Approach towards Understanding Clinical Anxiety

volgende artikel Examining the associations between interpersonal emotion regulation and psychosocial adjustment in emerging adulthood

Aderka, I. M., Hofmann, S. G., Nickerson, A., Hermesh, H., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., & Marom, S. (2012). Functional impairment in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.003. CrossRefPubMed

Alden, L. E., & Taylor, C. T. (2004). Interpersonal processes in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 857–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.006. CrossRefPubMed

Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674088. CrossRefPubMed

Alvard, M. S. (2004). The ultimatum game, fairness, and cooperation among big game hunters. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & H. Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality (p. 413–435). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/0199262055.003.0014

Baker, S. L., Heinrichs, N., Kim, H. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2002). The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2. CrossRefPubMed

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996). Comparison of Beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13. CrossRefPubMed

Belzer, K., & Schneier, F. R. (2004). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: issues in conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10, 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/00131746-200409000-00003. CrossRefPubMed

Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren’t fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068. CrossRef

Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Stoycos, S. A., Cardinale, E. M., Huebner, B., & Marsh, A. A. (2016). Is costly punishment altruistic? exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in real-world altruists. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18974. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x. CrossRef

Civai, C., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Gamer, M., & Rumiati, R. I. (2010). Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition, 114(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001. CrossRefPubMed

Coles, M. E., Gibb, B. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory in Adults with Social Anxiety Disorder. Depression and Anxiety, (Vol. 14)

Dozois, D. J. A., Dobson, K. S., & Ahnberg, J. L. (1998). A psychometric evaluation of the Beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83. CrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146. CrossRef

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586885. CrossRef

Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Profiling: predicting social anxiety from facebook profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434967. CrossRef

Freedman, G., & Flanagan, M. (2017). From dictators to avatars: furthering social and personality psychology through game methods. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(12), e12368. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12368. CrossRef

Fresco, D. M., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hami, S., Stein, M. B., & Goetz, D. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of selfreport and clinicianadministered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170105405. CrossRefPubMed

Gilbert, P. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: the role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 1174–189.

Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety: the role of attraction, social competition, and social hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24(4), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70260-4. CrossRef

Gradin, V. B., Pérez, A., MacFarlane, J. A., Cavin, I., Waiter, G., Engelmann, J., et al. (2015). Abnormal brain responses to social fairness in depression: an fMRI study using the Ultimatum Game. Psychological Medicine, 45(6), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002347. CrossRefPubMed

Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., Brambilla, P., Zuanon, S., Perini, L., Balestrieri, M., et al. (2013). Anxious ultimatums: how anxiety disorders affect socioeconomic behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 27(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.698982. CrossRefPubMed

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7. CrossRef

Harlé, K. M., Allen, J. J. B., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). The impact of depression on social economic decision making. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(2), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018612. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hart, T., Turk, C., Heimberg, R., & Liebowitz, M. (1999). Relation of marital status to social phobia severity. Depression and Anxiety, 10(1), 28–32. CrossRef

Hope, D. A., Sigler, K. D., Penn, D. L., & Meier, V. (1998). Social anxiety, recall of interpersonal information, and social impact on others. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 12(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.12.4.303. CrossRef

Inoue, Y., Takahashi, T., Burriss, R. P., Arai, S., Hasegawa, T., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2017). Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game depending on players’ social rank. Scientific Reports, 7, 5335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05603-7. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kaufman, J., & Charney, D. (2000). Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 12(S1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6394. CrossRefPubMed

Leary, M. R., & Atherton, S. C. (1986). Self-efficacy, social anxiety, and inhibition in interpersonal encounters. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.256. CrossRef

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). The self-presentational model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 94–112). New York: Guilford Press.

Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., & Campbell, C. D. (1988). Self-presentational concerns and social anxiety: the role of generalized impression expectancies. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90032-3. CrossRef

Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social Phobia. In Modern problems of pharmacopsychiatry (Vol. 22, pp. 141–173). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1159/000414022

Luo, Y., Wu, T., Broster, L. S., Feng, C., Zhang, D., Gu, R., & Luo, Y.-J. (2014). The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations. Psychophysiology, 51(9), 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12235. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Schmidt, N. B., & Eckel, L. A. (2008). Submitting to defeat: social anxiety, dominance threat, and decrements in testosterone. Psychological Science, 19(8), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02154.x. CrossRefPubMed

Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.377. CrossRefPubMed

Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 289(5485), 1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1773. CrossRefPubMed

Oakman, J., Van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., & Farvolden, P. (2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of a self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10124. CrossRefPubMed

Peterburs, J., Voegler, R., Liepelt, R., Schulze, A., Wilhelm, S., Ocklenburg, S., & Straube, T. (2017). Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44062. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rappaport, L. M., Moskowitz, D. S., & D’Antono, B. (2014). Naturalistic interpersonal behavior patterns differentiate depression and anxiety symptoms in the community. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035625. CrossRefPubMed

Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9. CrossRefPubMed

Robson, S. E., Repetto, L., Gountouna, V. E., & Nicodemus, K. K. (2020). A review of neuroeconomic gameplay in psychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry, 25, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0405-5. CrossRefPubMed

Rodebaugh, T. L., Heimberg, R. G., Taylor, K. P., & Lenze, E. J. (2016). Clarifying the behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder: effects of interpersonal problems and symptom severity on generosity. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615578128. CrossRefPubMed

Rodebaugh, T. L., Tonge, N. A., Weisman, J. S., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. C., & Bogdan, R. (2017). The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 95, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–1095.

Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., Cissell, S., et al. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20503. CrossRefPubMed

Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202. CrossRef

Schneier, F. R., Heckelman, L., Garfinkel, R., Campeas, R., Fallon, B. A., Gitow, A., et al. (1994). Functional impairment in social phobia. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55(8), 322–331. PubMed

Stein, M. B., & Kean, Y. M. (2000). Disability and quality of life in social phobia: epidemiologic findings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(10), 1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1606. CrossRef

Stigler, G. J. (1950). The development of utility theory I. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/1828885. CrossRef

Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2001). Social Phobia: comments on the viability and validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the fear of negative evaluation questionnaire. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465801004039. CrossRef

Tone, E. B., Nahmias, E., Bakeman, R., Kvaran, T., Brosnan, S. F., Fani, N., & Schroth, E. A. (2019). Social anxiety and social behavior: a test of predictions from an evolutionary model. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618794923. CrossRef

Trower, P., & Gilbert, P. (1989). New theoretical conceptions of social anxiety and social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90044-5. CrossRef

Weisman, O., Aderka, I. M., Marom, S., Hermesh, H., & Gilboa-Schechtman, E. (2011). Social rank and affiliation in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6–7), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.010. CrossRefPubMed

Wittchen, H. U., Fuetsch, M., Sonntag, H., Müller, N., & Liebowitz, M. (2000). Disability and quality of life in pure and comorbid social phobia. Findings from a controlled study. European Psychiatry, 15(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00211-X. CrossRefPubMed

Wu, T., Luo, Y., Broster, L. S., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2013). The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: behavioral and electrodermal findings. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.694372. CrossRefPubMed

Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M., et al. (2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(50), 20364–20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zimmerman, M., & Chelminski, I. (2003). Generalized anxiety disorder in patients with major depression: is DSM-IV’s hierarchy correct? American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.504. CrossRef

Titel: Money Versus Social Rank: An Empirical Investigation of Unfairness in Social Anxiety
Auteurs: Andreea Bică
Romeo Z. Crețu
Ioana R. Podina
Publicatiedatum: 01-01-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10188-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Attention, Executive Control and Working Memory in Healthy Adults: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Interpersonal Patterns in Social Anxiety Disorder: Predictors and Outcomes of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy

Looming Cognitive Style More Consistently Predicts Anxiety than Depressive Symptoms: Evidence from a 3-Wave Yearlong Study

Personality Disorders and Their Relation to Treatment Outcomes in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Predicting and Moderating the Response to the Unified Protocol: Do Baseline Personality and Affective Profiles Matter?

COVID-19 and Anxiety Sensitivity Across Two Studies in Argentina: Associations with COVID-19 Worry, Symptom Severity, Anxiety, and Functional Impairment