Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Indicators of social and economic status are important health determinants. However, evidence for the influence of family socioeconomic status in adolescent wellbeing is inconsistent and during this period of development youth may begin to develop their own status positions. This study examined social and economic health inequalities by applying a multidimensional and youth-orientated approach. Using a recent (2010–2011) and representative sample of Swedish 14-year olds (n = 4456, 51 % females), the impact of family socioeconomic status, youth economic resources and peer status on internalizing symptoms and self-rated health were examined. Data was based on population register, sociometric and self-report information. Aspects of family socioeconomic status, youth’s own economy and peer status each showed independent associations, with poorer wellbeing observed with lower status. However, there were equally strong or even stronger effects of peer status and youth’s own economy than family socioeconomic status. Lower household income and occupational status were more predictive of poor self-rated health than of internalizing symptoms. The findings suggest that youth’s own economy and peer status are as important as family socioeconomic status for understanding inequalities in wellbeing. Thus, a focus on youth-orientated conceptualizations of social and economic disadvantage during adolescence is warranted.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M. (1966). The classification of children’s psychiatric symptoms: A factor analytic study. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,80(7), 1. CrossRef
Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,9(2), 165–195. CrossRef
Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology,1, 137–173.
Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science,14(2), 102–105. CrossRef
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology,18(4), 557. CrossRef
Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., et al. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: WHO regional office for Europe.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11, 227–268. CrossRef
Elliott, R., & Leonard, C. (2004). Peer pressure and poverty: Exploring fashion brands and consumption symbolism among children of the “British poor”. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,3, 347–359. CrossRef
Ganzeboom, H. B., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research,21(1), 1–56. CrossRef
Ganzeboom, H. B., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research,25(3), 201–239. CrossRef
Gesthuizen, M., Huijts, T., & Kraaykamp, G. (2012). Explaining health marginalisation of the lower educated: The role of cross national variations in health expenditure and labour market conditions. Sociology of health & illness, 34(4), 591–607. CrossRef
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence,13, 21–43. CrossRef
Hjalmarsson, S., & Mood, C. (2015). Do poorer youth have fewer friends? The role of household and child economic resources in adolescent school-class friendships. Children and Youth Services Review,57, 201–211. CrossRef
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PloS Medicine,7(7), 859. CrossRef
Kalter, F., Heath, A. F., Hewstone, M., Jonsson, J. O., Kalmijn, M., Kogan, I., & van Tubergen, F. (2013). The Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries (CILS4EU): Motivation, aims, and design. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim.
Kiesner, J. (2002). Depressive symptoms in early adolescence: Their relations with classroom problem behavior and peer status. Journal of Research on Adolescence,12(4), 463–478. CrossRef
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development,19(1), 130–147. CrossRef
Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,9, 221–229. CrossRef
Litwack, S. D., Aikins, J. W., & Cillessen, A. H. (2012). The distinct roles of sociometric and perceived popularity in friendship implications for adolescent depressive affect and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence,32(2), 226–251. CrossRef
Markides, K. S., & Rote, S. (2015). Immigrant Health Paradox. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource. 1–15.
Marks, P. E., Babcock, B., Cillessen, A. H., & Crick, N. R. (2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development,22(3), 609–622. CrossRef
Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome. How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Times Books.
Mayeux, L., Houser, J. J., & Dyches, K. D. (2011). Social acceptance and popularity: Two distinct forms of peer status. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 79–102). New York, NY: Guilford.
Mojtabai, R. (2006). Serious emotional and behavioral problems and mental health contacts in American and British children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(10), 1215–1223. CrossRef
Mood, C., & Jonsson, J. O. (2014). Poverty and welfare among children and their families 1968– 2010. Report 2014/2. Stockholm: Institutet för framtidsstudier [Institute for Future Studies].
Mood, C., & Jonsson, J. O. (2015). Trends in child poverty in Sweden: Parental and child reports. Child Indicators Research,. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9337-z.
Newman, B. M., Lohman, B. J., & Newman, P. R. (2007). Peer group membership and a sense of belonging: Their relationship to adolescent behavior problems. Adolescence,42(166), 241–263. PubMed
Olsson, E. (2007). The economic side of social relations: Household poverty, adolescents’ own resources and peer relations. European Sociological Review,23(4), 471–485. CrossRef
Pandey, S., & Elliott, W. (2010). Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research,1(1), 28–40. CrossRef
Sandstrom, M. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Eisenhower, A. (2003). Children’s appraisal of peer rejection experiences: Impact on social and emotional adjustment. Social Development,12(4), 530–550. CrossRef
Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers,35(2), 153–169.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Statistics Sweden [Statistiska centralbyrån]., (2015). Eudcation population register version 2015-01-01 [Befolkningens utbildning version 2015-01-01]. http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Statistik-efter-amne/Utbildning-och-forskning/Befolkningens-utbildning/Befolkningens-utbildning/
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. Berkeley: University of California Press.
van den Berg, Y. H., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference a cohort-sequential approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1108–1137.
Wolters, N., Knoors, H., Cillessen, A. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Behavioral, personality, and communicative predictors of acceptance and popularity in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence,34(5), 585–605. CrossRef
- Money, Peers and Parents: Social and Economic Aspects of Inequality in Youth Wellbeing
- Springer US