Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 3/2017

22-04-2017

Modifying Obsessive-Compulsive Beliefs about Controlling One’s Thoughts

Auteurs: Eileen P. Stech, Jessica R. Grisham

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder propose that beliefs about the importance of and need to control thoughts (ICT) are central to the maintenance of the disorder. Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) can be used to experimentally test this theory and may also have clinical utility as an adjunct therapeutic tool. The current study extended previous research to investigate whether two CBM-I sessions (one within and one outside the laboratory) would augment effects on obsessive-compulsive beliefs and behavior. We randomly allocated undergraduate participants high in ICT beliefs to a Positive (n = 30) or Control (n = 36) CBM-I condition and conducted multi-modal assessments immediately following the first training and at one-week follow-up. As predicted, participants in the Positive condition reported a reduction in obsessive-compulsive beliefs from baseline to follow-up (partial η 2 = .42), whereas those in the Control condition did not. Participants responded more adaptively to the ICT relevant stressor task at follow-up compared to post-intervention, but there was no significant difference between conditions. Likewise, participants reported a reduction in obsessive symptoms over time that did not differ between conditions. The findings are considered in light of cognitive models of OCD, and clinical implications are discussed.
Voetnoten
1
The pattern of results remained the same when paid participants were included, so participants were combined in all analyses.
 
2
Following the suggestion of an anonymous reviewer, we conducted an exploratory moderator analysis post hoc to assess if the effect of condition on change in ICT beliefs differed according to visual imagery ability as measured by the VVIQ. There was no significant interaction of condition and VVIQ, b = .16, 95% CI [−.72, 1.03], t = .36, p = .72.
 
3
When the full OCI-R was analysed in the same way the pattern of results remained the same: there was a main effect of time, F(1, 60) = 16.19, p < .001, partial \( {\eta}^2 \)= .21, indicating that averaged across conditions an overall reduction in symptoms was reported from baseline (M = 21.11, SD = 11.70) to follow-up (M = 17.39, SD = 12.40). A significant interaction effect was not found for the full OCI-R, p = .71, partial \( {\eta}^2 \)= .002.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abramowitz, J. S., Fabricant, L. E., Taylor, S., Deacon, B. J., McKay, D., & Storch, E. A. (2014). The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004.CrossRef Abramowitz, J. S., Fabricant, L. E., Taylor, S., Deacon, B. J., McKay, D., & Storch, E. A. (2014). The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 1–12. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cpr.​2014.​01.​004.CrossRef
go back to reference Abramowitz, J. S., Franklin, M. E., & Foa, E. B. (2002). Empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analytic review. Romanian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 2, 89–104. Abramowitz, J. S., Franklin, M. E., & Foa, E. B. (2002). Empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analytic review. Romanian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 2, 89–104.
go back to reference Beadel, J. R., Smyth, F. L., & Teachman, B. A. (2014). Change processes during cognitive bias modification for obsessive compulsive beliefs. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 103–119. doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9576-6.CrossRef Beadel, J. R., Smyth, F. L., & Teachman, B. A. (2014). Change processes during cognitive bias modification for obsessive compulsive beliefs. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 103–119. doi:10.​1007/​s10608-013-9576-6.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarke, P. J. F., Nanthakumar, S., Notebaert, L., Holmes, E. A., Blackwell, S. E., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Simply imagining sunshine, lollipops and rainbows will not budge the bias: The role of ambiguity in interpretive bias modification. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 120–131. doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9564-x.CrossRefPubMed Clarke, P. J. F., Nanthakumar, S., Notebaert, L., Holmes, E. A., Blackwell, S. E., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Simply imagining sunshine, lollipops and rainbows will not budge the bias: The role of ambiguity in interpretive bias modification. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 120–131. doi:10.​1007/​s10608-013-9564-x.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cougle, J. R., & Lee, H. J. (2014). Pathological and non-pathological features of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Revisiting basic assumptions of cognitive models. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3, 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.11.002.CrossRef Cougle, J. R., & Lee, H. J. (2014). Pathological and non-pathological features of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Revisiting basic assumptions of cognitive models. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3, 12–20. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jocrd.​2013.​11.​002.CrossRef
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239. doi:10.1348/014466505X29657.CrossRefPubMed Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239. doi:10.​1348/​014466505X29657.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kreindler, D., Levitt, A., Woolridge, N., & Lumsden, C. J. (2003). Portable mood mapping: The validity and reliability of analog scale displays for mood assessment via hand-held computer. Psychiatry Research, 120, 165–177. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(03)00196-3.CrossRefPubMed Kreindler, D., Levitt, A., Woolridge, N., & Lumsden, C. J. (2003). Portable mood mapping: The validity and reliability of analog scale displays for mood assessment via hand-held computer. Psychiatry Research, 120, 165–177. doi:10.​1016/​S0165-1781(03)00196-3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.CrossRefPubMed Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. doi:10.​1016/​0005-7967(94)00075-U.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C., Koster, E. H. W., & Fox, E. (2009). Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 89–99. doi:10.1037/a0014878.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C., Koster, E. H. W., & Fox, E. (2009). Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 89–99. doi:10.​1037/​a0014878.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McKay, D., Abramowitz, J. S., Calamari, J. E., Kyrios, M., Radomsky, A., Sookman, D., et al. (2004). A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: Symptoms versus mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 283–313. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.04.003.CrossRefPubMed McKay, D., Abramowitz, J. S., Calamari, J. E., Kyrios, M., Radomsky, A., Sookman, D., et al. (2004). A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: Symptoms versus mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 283–313. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cpr.​2004.​04.​003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Menne-Lothmann, C., Viechtbauer, W., Höhn, P., Kasanova, Z., Haller, S. P., Drukker, M., et al. (2014). How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PloS One, 9, 1–26. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100925.CrossRef Menne-Lothmann, C., Viechtbauer, W., Höhn, P., Kasanova, Z., Haller, S. P., Drukker, M., et al. (2014). How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PloS One, 9, 1–26. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0100925.CrossRef
go back to reference Mobini, S., Mackintosh, B., Illingworth, J., Gega, L., Langdon, P., & Hoppitt, L. (2014). Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 272–279. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.12.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mobini, S., Mackintosh, B., Illingworth, J., Gega, L., Langdon, P., & Hoppitt, L. (2014). Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 272–279. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jbtep.​2013.​12.​002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Moulding, R., Coles, M. E., Abramowitz, J. S., Alcolado, G. M., Alonso, P., Belloch, A., et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3, 280–291. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006.CrossRef Moulding, R., Coles, M. E., Abramowitz, J. S., Alcolado, G. M., Alonso, P., Belloch, A., et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3, 280–291. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jocrd.​2014.​02.​006.CrossRef
go back to reference Myers, S. G., Fisher, P. L., & Wells, A. (2008). Belief domains of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) and their specific relationship with obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(3), 475–484. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.03.012 Myers, S. G., Fisher, P. L., & Wells, A. (2008). Belief domains of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) and their specific relationship with obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(3), 475–484. doi:10.​1016/​j.​janxdis.​2007.​03.​012
go back to reference Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory - part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1527–1542. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.010.CrossRef Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory - part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1527–1542. doi:10.​1016/​j.​brat.​2004.​07.​010.CrossRef
go back to reference Olatunji, B. O., Rosenfield, D., Tart, C. D., Cottraux, J., Powers, M. B., & Smits, J. A. J. (2013). Behavioral versus cognitive treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: An examination of outcome and mediators of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 415–428. doi:10.1037/a0031865.CrossRefPubMed Olatunji, B. O., Rosenfield, D., Tart, C. D., Cottraux, J., Powers, M. B., & Smits, J. A. J. (2013). Behavioral versus cognitive treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: An examination of outcome and mediators of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 415–428. doi:10.​1037/​a0031865.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Öst, L. G., Havnen, A., Hansen, B., & Kvale, G. (2015). Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive–compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993–2014. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 156–169. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.003.CrossRefPubMed Öst, L. G., Havnen, A., Hansen, B., & Kvale, G. (2015). Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive–compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993–2014. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 156–169. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cpr.​2015.​06.​003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.CrossRef Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.​3758/​BF03206553.CrossRef
go back to reference Salemink, E., Wolters, L., & de Haan, E. (2015). Augmentation of treatment as usual with online cognitive bias modification of interpretation training in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 49, 112–119. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.003.CrossRefPubMed Salemink, E., Wolters, L., & de Haan, E. (2015). Augmentation of treatment as usual with online cognitive bias modification of interpretation training in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 49, 112–119. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jbtep.​2015.​02.​003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Taylor, S., Coles, M. E., Abramowitz, J. S., Wu, K. D., Olatunji, B. O., Timpano, K. R., et al. (2010). How are dysfunctional beliefs related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 165–176. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.24.3.165.CrossRef Taylor, S., Coles, M. E., Abramowitz, J. S., Wu, K. D., Olatunji, B. O., Timpano, K. R., et al. (2010). How are dysfunctional beliefs related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 165–176. doi:10.​1891/​0889-8391.​24.​3.​165.CrossRef
go back to reference Torkan, H., Blackwell, S. E., Holmes, E. A., Kalantari, M., Neshat-Doost, H. T., Maroufi, M., & Talebi, H. (2014). Positive imagery cognitive bias modification in treatment-seeking patients with major depression in Iran: A pilot study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 132–145. doi:10.1007/s10608-014-9598-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Torkan, H., Blackwell, S. E., Holmes, E. A., Kalantari, M., Neshat-Doost, H. T., Maroufi, M., & Talebi, H. (2014). Positive imagery cognitive bias modification in treatment-seeking patients with major depression in Iran: A pilot study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 132–145. doi:10.​1007/​s10608-014-9598-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Wilhelm, S., Berman, N. C., Keshaviah, A., Schwartz, R. A., & Steketee, G. (2015). Mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder: Role of maladaptive beliefs and schemas. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 5–10. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.006.CrossRefPubMed Wilhelm, S., Berman, N. C., Keshaviah, A., Schwartz, R. A., & Steketee, G. (2015). Mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder: Role of maladaptive beliefs and schemas. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 5–10. doi:10.​1016/​j.​brat.​2014.​12.​006.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 23–51. doi:10.1080/10705510701758166.CrossRef Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 23–51. doi:10.​1080/​1070551070175816​6.CrossRef
go back to reference Woody, S. R., Whittal, M. L., & McLean, P. D. (2011). Mechanisms of symptom reduction in treatment for obsessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 653–664. doi:10.1037/a0024827.CrossRefPubMed Woody, S. R., Whittal, M. L., & McLean, P. D. (2011). Mechanisms of symptom reduction in treatment for obsessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 653–664. doi:10.​1037/​a0024827.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Modifying Obsessive-Compulsive Beliefs about Controlling One’s Thoughts
Auteurs
Eileen P. Stech
Jessica R. Grisham
Publicatiedatum
22-04-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9603-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 3/2017 Naar de uitgave