Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The well-known excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) assessment, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), is not consistently qualified for patients with diverse living habits. This study is aimed to build a modified ESS (mESS) and then to verify its feasibility in the assessment of EDS for patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in central China.
A Ten-item Sleepiness Questionnaire (10-ISQ) was built by adding two backup items to the original ESS. Then the 10-ISQ was administered to 122 patients in central China with suspected SDB [among them, 119 cases met the minimal diagnostic criteria for obstructive sleep apnea by sleep study, e.g., apnea and hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 h−1] and 117 healthy central Chinese volunteers without SDB. Multivariate exploratory techniques were used for item validation. The unreliable item in the original ESS was replaced by the eligible backup item, thus a modified ESS (mESS) was built, and then verified.
Item 8 proved to be the only unreliable item in central Chinese patients, with the least factor loading on the main factor and the lowest item-total correlation both in the 10-ISQ and in the original ESS, deletion of it would increase the Cronbach’s alpha (from 0.86 to 0.87 in the 10-ISQ; from 0.83 to 0.85 in the original ESS). The mESS was subsequently built by replacing item 8 in the original ESS with item 10 in the 10-ISQ. Verification with patients’ responses revealed that the mESS was a single-factor questionnaire with good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86). The sum score of the mESS not only correlated with AHI (P < 0.01) but was also able to discriminate the severity of obstructive apnea (P < 0.01). Nasal CPAP treatment for severe OSA reduced the score significantly (P < 0.001). The performance of the mESS was poor in evaluating normal subjects.
The mESS improves the validity of ESS for our patients. Therefore, it is justified to use it instead of the original one in assessment of EDS for patients with SDB in central China.
Johns, M. W. (1991). A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep,14, 540–545. PubMed
Chica-Urzola, H. L., Escobar-Cordoba, F., & Eslava-Schmalbach, J. (2007). Validating the Epworth sleepiness scale. Review Salud Publication (Bogota),9, 558–567.
Nguyen, A. T., Baltzan, M. A., Small, D., et al. (2006). Clinical reproducibility of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine,2, 170–174. PubMed
Gander, P. H., Marshall, N. S., Harris, R., & Reid, P. (2005). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale: influence of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation. Epworth Sleepiness scores of adults in New Zealand. Sleep,28, 249–253. PubMed
Vignatelli, L., Plazzi, G., Barbato, A., et al. (2003). Italian version of the Epworth sleepiness scale: external validity. Neurology Science,23, 295–300. CrossRef
Chiner, E., Arriero, J. M., Signes-Costa, J., et al. (1999). Validation of the Spanish version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in patients with a sleep apnea syndrome. Archivos de Bronconeumologia,35, 422–427. PubMed
Johns, M. W. (1992). Reliability and factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep,15, 376–381. PubMed
- Modification of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in Central China
Jin Nong Zhang
Ting Ting Zhao
- Springer Netherlands