Top

Gepubliceerd in:

25-05-2021

Moderne liefde: de driehoeksverhouding tussen jou en mij en de smartphone

Auteur: Bill R. Garris

Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd | Uitgave 2/2021

Samenvatting

Elke romantische relatie wordt mede bepaald door communicatie, openheid en grenzen. Momenteel speelt de huidige informatie- en communicatietechnologie (ICT) daar ook een rol in, zeker in de vorm van de smartphone, die diep is doorgedrongen in onze persoonlijke levens en daarmee ook in het wel en wee van onze liefdesrelaties; en in het ontstaan, standhouden en eventueel beëindigen van die liefdesrelaties. De modellen die tot nu toe zijn gebruikt om deze nieuwe dynamiek te beschrijven, zijn gebaseerd op relatietheorieën uit het verleden. Maar het is daarnaast zinvol om therapeuten en onderzoekers die zich bezighouden met de dynamiek van relatievorming, inzicht te verschaffen in de veranderingen die zich hierbij het afgelopen decennium hebben voorgedaan onder invloed van ICT. Dit onderzoek naar de invloed van ICT op relatiedynamiek is uitgevoerd volgens de methode van de gefundeerde theorie, en is gebaseerd op de verhalen en beschrijvingen van zestien deelnemers. De studie toont aan dat de invloed van technologie op relaties zich op vier gebieden doet gelden: bereikbaarheid, intimiteit, grenzen en aanwezigheid.

vorige artikel Het helen van intergenerationele emotionele wonden: een integratieve relationele neurobiologische benadering

volgende artikel Processen van zelfvergeving in therapie bij ontrouw in een liefdesrelatie: een casusstudie naar een empirisch ondersteunde behandeling

Aagaard, J. (2016). Mobile devices, interaction, and distraction: a qualitative exploration of absent presence. AI & Society, 31(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0638-z.CrossRef

Age, L. J. (2011). Grounded theory methodology: positivism, hermeneutics, and pragmatism. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1599–1615. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-6/age.pdf.

Ainsworth, M. S. (1979). Infant–mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932.CrossRef

Allred, R. J., & Crowley, J. P. (2017). The “mere presence” hypothesis: Investigating the nonverbal effects of cell-phone presence on conversation satisfaction. Communication Studies, 68(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1241292.CrossRef

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Etgar, S. (2016). Intimacy and smartphone multitasking—A new oxymoron. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116662658.PubMedCrossRef

Anderson, C. (2004). An update on the effects of playing violent video games. Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.009.PubMedCrossRef

Anzani, A., Di Sarno, M., & Prunas, A. (2018). Using smartphone apps to find sexual partners: a review of the literature. Sexologies, 27(3), e61–e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2018.05.001.CrossRef

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048687.PubMedCrossRef

Beitin, B. K. (2008). Qualitative research in marriage and family therapy: who is in the interview. Contemporary Family Therapy, 30(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-007-9054-y.CrossRef

Bergdall, A., Kraft, J., Andes, K., Carter, M., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., & Hock-Long, L. (2012). Love and hooking up in the new millennium: communication technology and relationships among urban African American and Puerto Rican young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(6), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.604748.PubMedCrossRef

Beyens, I., Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Aadolescents fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 1–8.CrossRef

Blackwell, D., Leaman, C., Tramposch, R., Osborne, C., & Liss, M. (2017). Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.039.CrossRef

Blanchard, V. L., Hawkins, A. J., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2009). Investigating the effects of marriage and relationship education on couples’ communication skills: a metaanalytic study. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 203–214.PubMedCrossRef

Booker, C. L., Kelly, Y. J., & Sacker, A. (2018). Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10–15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5220-4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Bowlby, J. (2008). Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Brem, M., Spiller, L., & Vandehey, M. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2831–2850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554286.PubMedCrossRef

Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.3.1358.CrossRef

Caughlin, J. P., Basinger, E. D., & Sharabi, L. L. (2016). The connections between communication technologies and relational conflict: a multiple goals and communication interdependence perspective. In J. A. Samp (red.), Communicating interpersonal conflict in close relationships: contexts, challenges, and opportunities (pag. 57–72). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774237.CrossRef

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.002.CrossRef

Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187.CrossRef

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4e druk.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2014). Clinical implications of internet infidelity: where Facebook fits in. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2013.874211.CrossRef

Crowley, J. P., Allred, R. J., Follon, J., & Volkmer, C. (2018). Replication of the mere presence hypothesis: the effects of cell phones on face-to-face conversations. Communication Studies, 69(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1467941.CrossRef

DeGusta, M. (2012). Are smart phones spreading faster than any technology in human history. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/427787/are-smart-phones-spreading-faster-than-any-technology-in-human-history/. Geraadpleegd op: 9 May 2012.

Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative research. Cambridge: Academic Press.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6.PubMedCrossRef

Donnelly, E., & Kuss, D. J. (2016). Depression among users of social networking sites (SNSs): the role of SNS addiction and increased usage. Journal of Addiction and Preventive Medicine, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.19104/japm.2016.107.CrossRef

Eichenberg, C., Huss, J., & Küsel, C. (2017). From online dating to online divorce: an overview of couple and family relationships shaped through digital media. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9434-x.CrossRef

Emanuel, R., Bell, R., Cotton, C., Craig, J., Drummond, D., Gibson, S., et al. (2015). The truth about smartphone addiction. College Student Journal, 49(2), 291–299.

Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.

Felton, N. (2008). Consumption spreads faster today. New York Times, band 10. (2008, February 10)

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: a critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522.PubMedCrossRef

Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: an exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176.CrossRef

Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. Aarkhus (red.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pag. 227–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489471.018.CrossRef

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: issues and discussion. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: a cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051.CrossRef

Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x.CrossRef

Hertlein, K. M., & Ancheta, K. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19(11), 1–11. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss11/2.

Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: a critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 14(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290508.CrossRef

Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: a literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), Article 3. Retrieved from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4230/3273.

Hertlein, K., & Webster, M. (2008). Technology, relationships, and problems: a research synthesis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00087.x.PubMedCrossRef

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352.PubMedCrossRef

Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari, F., & Pourghane, P. (2017). College students, experiences on smart phone technology usage: a qualitative content analysis study. The Qualitative Report, 22(11), 2864–2880. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss11/2.

Johnson, G. M. (2010a). Internet use and child development: validation of the ecological techno-subsystem. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 176–185.

Johnson, G. M. (2010b). Young children’s Internet use at home and school: patterns and profiles. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X10379783.CrossRef

Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use during childhood and the ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de la Technologie. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2CP4T.CrossRef

Kranzberg, M. (1995). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s Laws”. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 15(1), 5–13.CrossRef

Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: understanding the role of Smartphone jealousy among “Generation Y” users. ECIS ResearchPapers, 109. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/109 (Gecreëerd: 15 jun 2016). Geraadpleegd op: 12 Sep 2016.

Kuss, D. J., & Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2016). Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: a systematic review of clinical research. World Journal of Psychiatry, 6(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.143.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Lane, B. L., Piercy, C. W., & Carr, C. T. (2016). Making it Facebook official: the warranting value of online relationship status disclosures on relational characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.016.CrossRef

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/83.3.688-a.CrossRef

Lup, K., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L. (2015). Instagram #Instasad?: Exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0560.CrossRef

Malak, M. Z., & Khalifeh, A. H. (2018). Anxiety and depression among school students in Jordan: prevalence, risk factors, and predictors. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 54(2), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12229.PubMedCrossRef

McCormack, M. (2015). The role of smartphones and technology in sexual and romantic lives. http://dro.dur.ac.uk/14770/. Geraadpleegd op: 10 March 2015.

McDaniel, B. T. (2013). “Technoference”: Everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. In C. J. Bruess (red.), Family communication in the age of digital and social media. New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1668-1.CrossRef

McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.CrossRef

McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822.PubMedCrossRef

McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide: infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95.PubMedCrossRef

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. H. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of inperson social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755.CrossRef

Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019.CrossRef

Morris, A. Unwrapping presence: the impact of cell phones on face-to-face conversations. Masters thesis, Georgetown University, Washington DC, 2018. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8bdd/8cf9762bd4108209ad93ea627567aca5c949.pdf

Murray, C., & Campbell, E. C. (2015). The pleasures and perils of technology in intimate relationships. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 14(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.953651.CrossRef

Ohadi, J., Brown, B., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L. (2018). I just text to say I love you: partner similarity in texting and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 126–132.CrossRef

Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034787.PubMedCrossRef

Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., & Melher, D. (2016). Too many swipes for today: The development of the Problematic Tinder Use Scale (PTUS). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(3), 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.016.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Parker, T. S., & Wampler, K. S. (2003). How bad is it: perceptions of the relationship impact of different types of Internet sexual activities. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(4), 415–429.CrossRef

Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224269.CrossRef

Pew Research Center (2015). Technology device ownership: 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-device-ownership-2015/. Geraadpleegd op: 29 Oct 2015.

Pew Research Center (2017). Record shares of Americans now own smartphones, have home broadband. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/12/evolutionof-technology/. Geraadpleegd op: 12 Jan 2017.

Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now: how the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827.CrossRef

Puri, A., & Sharma, R. (2016). Internet usage, depression, social isolation and loneliness amongst adolescents. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 7(10), 996.

Qualter, P., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R., Van Roekel, E., Lodder, G., Bangee, M., et al. (2015). Loneliness across the life span. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615568999.PubMedCrossRef

Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and interactive media use by young children: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2251.PubMedCrossRef

Reed, L., Tolman, R., & Ward, L. (2016). Snooping and sexting: digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1556–1576.PubMedCrossRef

Roberson, P. N., Lenger, K. A., Norona, J. C., & Olmstead, S. B. (2018). A longitudinal examination of the directional effects between relationship quality and well-being for a national sample of US Men and Women. Sex Roles, 78(1–2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0777-4.CrossRef

Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.CrossRef

Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001.CrossRef

Rus, H. M., & Tiemensma, J. (2017). “It’s complicated”: a systematic review of associations between social network site use and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.004.CrossRef

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (red.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pag. 87–113). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Ryff, C. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263.PubMedCrossRef

Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.006.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Smith, R. R. (2019). A phenomenological exploration of the impact of social networking site usage on committed romantic relationships (doctoral dissertation). https://dmc.tamuc.edu/digital/collection/p15778coll7/id/872/. Geraadpleegd op: Aug 2018.

Snyder, D. K. (1997). Marital satisfaction inventory, revised (MSI-R). https://v-psyche.com/. Geraadpleegd op: 7 Sep 2017.

Sparkes, A., & Smith, B. (2013). Qualitative research in sport, exercise & health sciences: from process to product. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRef

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n591.CrossRef

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love. New York: Basic Books.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grajek, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 312–329.CrossRef

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78.CrossRef

Tandoc, E. C., Ferrucci, P., & Duffy, M. (2015). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: is Facebooking depressing. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.053.CrossRef

Tiggemann, M., & Barbato, I. (2018). You look great!: the effect of viewing appearancerelated Instagram comments on women’s body image. Body Image, 27, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.009.PubMedCrossRef

Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2013). NetGirls: the Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46(6), 630–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22141.CrossRef

Timonen, V., Foley, G., & Conlon, C. (2018). Challenges when using grounded theory: a pragmatic introduction to doing GT research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918758086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918758086.CrossRef

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. Behaviour Change, 21(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.21.2.127.55422.CrossRef

Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/e512142015-699.CrossRef

Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041.PubMedCrossRef

Weinstein, A., Dorani, D., Elhadif, R., Bukovza, Y., Yarmulnik, A., & Dannon, P. (2015). Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 27(1), 4–9.PubMed

Wheeldon, J., & Faubert, J. (2009). Framing experience: concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 68–83.CrossRef

Titel: Moderne liefde: de driehoeksverhouding tussen jou en mij en de smartphone
Auteur: Bill R. Garris
Publicatiedatum: 25-05-2021
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd / Uitgave 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1566-0206
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12440-021-00147-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2021

Het beeldscherm als blikverruimer: een speelse respons op de uitdagingen van online therapie voor kinderen en gezinnen

Het helen van intergenerationele emotionele wonden: een integratieve relationele neurobiologische benadering

Posttraumatische stressstoornis en opvoedingsstijl: de mediërende rol van emotieregulatie

Processen van zelfvergeving in therapie bij ontrouw in een liefdesrelatie: een casusstudie naar een empirisch ondersteunde behandeling

Ten geleide