Top

Gepubliceerd in:

10-04-2017 | Original Article

Methods of Delivering Progress Feedback to Optimise Patient Outcomes: The Value of Expected Treatment Trajectories

Auteurs: Geoffrey R. Hooke, Adelln A. H. Sng, Nadia K. Cunningham, Andrew C. Page

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 2/2018

Abstract

Whilst feedback is demonstrated to improve therapy outcomes, little attention has been given to the relative benefits of the form in which feedback is given. The present study aimed to compare patients’ perceptions of feedback graphs with and without expected treatment response trajectories. In a counter-balanced design, patients in 2-week CBT programs were shown feedback graphs with and without expected symptom trajectories; and were asked to complete questionnaire regarding the appeal after viewing the first graphs. Patients (n = 42) viewed feedback graphs and preferred those with trajectories present and perceived the additional detail helpful to both themselves and their therapists. The present findings support the appeal for and potential usefulness of richer feedback for facilitating discussion and positive outcomes in therapy.

vorige artikel Using Motivational Interviewing to Manage Process Markers of Ambivalence and Resistance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

volgende artikel Miles to Go Before We Sleep: Advancing the Understanding of Psychotherapy by Modeling Complex Processes

Bar-Kalifa, E., Atzil-Slonim, D., Rafaeli, E., Peri, T., Rubel, J., & Lutz, W. (2016). Therapist-client agreement in assessments of clients’ functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(12), 1127–1134. doi:10.1037/ccp0000157.CrossRefPubMed

Bech, P., Gudex, C., & Johansen, K. S. (1996). The WHO (Ten) Well-Being Index: Validation in diabetes. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 183–190. doi:10.1159/000289073.CrossRefPubMed

Bickman, L., Kelley, S. D., Breda, C., de Andrade, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: Results of a randomized trial. Psychiatric Services, 62(12), 1423–1429. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.002052011.CrossRefPubMed

Delgadillo, J., Moreea, O., & Lutz, W. (2016). Different people respond differently to therapy: A demonstration using patient profiling and risk stratification. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 79, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.02.003.CrossRefPubMed

Dyer, K., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2014). Development and psychometrics of the five item daily index in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 152–154, 409–415. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

Dyer, K., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2016). Effects of providing domain specific progress monitoring and feedback to therapists and patients on outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 26(3), 297–306. doi:10.1080/10503307.2014.983207.CrossRefPubMed

Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A Lab Test and Algorithms for Identifying Clients at Risk for Treatment Failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163.CrossRefPubMed

Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.51.10.1059.CrossRefPubMed

Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19.CrossRefPubMed

Kashyap, S., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2015). Identifying risk of deliberate self-harm through longitudinal monitoring of psychological distress in an inpatient psychiatric population. BMC Psychiatry, 15. doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0464-3.PubMedPubMedCentral

Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., Gilbody, S., Churchill, R., Aiken, L., ... Moore, M (2016). Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD011119.PubMed

Lambert, M. J., & Finch, A. E. (1999). The outcome questionnaire. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd edn., pp. 831–869). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 159–172.CrossRefPubMed

Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Slade, K. L., Whipple, J. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165–174. doi:10.1002/jclp.20113.CrossRefPubMed

Lutz, W. (2003). Efficacy, effectiveness, and expected treatment response in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(7), 745–750.CrossRefPubMed

Lutz, W., Leach, C., Barkham, M., Lucock, M., Stiles, W. B., Evans, C., ... Iveson, S (2005). Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 904–913.CrossRefPubMed

Newnham, E. A., Doyle, E. L., Sng, A. A., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2012). Improving clinical outcomes in psychiatric care with touch-screen technology. Psychological Services, 9(2), 221–223. doi:10.1037/a0026143.CrossRefPubMed

Newnham, E. A., Harwood, K. E., & Page, A. C. (2007). Evaluating the clinical significance of responses by psychiatric inpatients to the mental health subscales of the SF-36. Journal of Affective Disorders, 98(1–2), 91–97. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.07.001.CrossRefPubMed

Newnham, E. A., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2010a). Monitoring treatment response and outcomes using the World Health Organization’s Wellbeing Index in psychiatric care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(1–2), 133–138. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.005.CrossRefPubMed

Newnham, E. A., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2010b). Progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care reduces depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 127(1–3), 139–146. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.003.CrossRefPubMed

Newnham, E. A., & Page, A. C. (2010). Bridging the gap between best evidence and best practice in mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1), 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.004.CrossRefPubMed

Page, A. C., Cunningham, N. K., & Hooke, G. R. (2016). Using daily monitoring of psychiatric symptoms to evaluate hospital length of stay. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 2(6), 341–345.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Page, A. C., Hooke, G. R., & Rampono, J. (2005). A methodology for timing reviews of inpatient hospital stay. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 198–201.CrossRefPubMed

Page, A. C., & Stritzke, W. G. K. (2014). Clinical psychology for trainees: Foundations of science-informed practice (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Restifo, E., Kashyap, S., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2015). Daily monitoring of temporal trajectories of suicidal ideation predict self-injury: a novel application of patient progress monitoring. Psychother Research, doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1006707.

Ronk, F. R., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2012). How consistent are clinical significance classifications when calculation methods and outcome measures differ? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 19(2), 167–179. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2012.01281.x.

Ronk, F. R., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2016). Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0895-5.CrossRef

Ronk, F. R., Korman, J. R., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2013). Assessing clinical significance of treatment outcomes using the DASS-21. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1103–1110. doi:10.1037/a0033100.CrossRefPubMed

Rubel, J., Lutz, W., Kopta, S. M., Kock, K., Minami, T., Zimmermann, D., & Saunders, S. M. (2015). Defining early positive response to psychotherapy: An empirical comparison between clinically significant change criteria and growth mixture modeling. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 478–488. doi:10.1037/pas0000060.CrossRefPubMed

Schulte, D., & Eifert, G. H. (2002). What to do when manuals fail? The dual model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3), 312–328.

Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 298–311. doi:10.1037/a0019247.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Methods of Delivering Progress Feedback to Optimise Patient Outcomes: The Value of Expected Treatment Trajectories
Auteurs: Geoffrey R. Hooke
Adelln A. H. Sng
Nadia K. Cunningham
Andrew C. Page
Publicatiedatum: 10-04-2017
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9851-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2018

When is it Effective to Focus on the Alliance? Analysis of a Within-Client Moderator

Not Just a Non-specific Factor: Moderators of the Effect of Within- and Between-Clients Alliance on Outcome in CBT

Increased Attention Regulation from Emotion Regulation Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Introduction to the Special Issue on Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Does “Necessary, But Not Sufficient” Still Capture It?

Reports of Therapy Skill Use and Their Efficacy in Daily Life in the Short-Term Treatment of Depression

Miles to Go Before We Sleep: Advancing the Understanding of Psychotherapy by Modeling Complex Processes