Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Whilst feedback is demonstrated to improve therapy outcomes, little attention has been given to the relative benefits of the form in which feedback is given. The present study aimed to compare patients’ perceptions of feedback graphs with and without expected treatment response trajectories. In a counter-balanced design, patients in 2-week CBT programs were shown feedback graphs with and without expected symptom trajectories; and were asked to complete questionnaire regarding the appeal after viewing the first graphs. Patients (n = 42) viewed feedback graphs and preferred those with trajectories present and perceived the additional detail helpful to both themselves and their therapists. The present findings support the appeal for and potential usefulness of richer feedback for facilitating discussion and positive outcomes in therapy.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., Gilbody, S., Churchill, R., Aiken, L., ... Moore, M (2016). Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD011119. PubMed
Lambert, M. J., & Finch, A. E. (1999). The outcome questionnaire. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd edn., pp. 831–869). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Page, A. C., & Stritzke, W. G. K. (2014). Clinical psychology for trainees: Foundations of science-informed practice (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Restifo, E., Kashyap, S., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2015). Daily monitoring of temporal trajectories of suicidal ideation predict self-injury: a novel application of patient progress monitoring. Psychother Research, doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1006707.
Ronk, F. R., Hooke, G. R., & Page, A. C. (2012). How consistent are clinical significance classifications when calculation methods and outcome measures differ? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 19(2), 167–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2012.01281.x.
Rubel, J., Lutz, W., Kopta, S. M., Kock, K., Minami, T., Zimmermann, D., & Saunders, S. M. (2015). Defining early positive response to psychotherapy: An empirical comparison between clinically significant change criteria and growth mixture modeling. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 478–488. doi: 10.1037/pas0000060. CrossRefPubMed
Schulte, D., & Eifert, G. H. (2002). What to do when manuals fail? The dual model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3), 312–328.
Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 298–311. doi: 10.1037/a0019247. CrossRefPubMed
- Methods of Delivering Progress Feedback to Optimise Patient Outcomes: The Value of Expected Treatment Trajectories
Geoffrey R. Hooke
Adelln A. H. Sng
Nadia K. Cunningham
Andrew C. Page
- Springer US