Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The purpose of this investigation was to examine discrepancies among three informants’ (adolescents, mothers, and observers) reports of maternal consulting in regard to peer relationships and the relation of the discrepancies to four social adjustment variables (prosocial behavior, loneliness, positive friendship quality, and physical victimization). An ethnically diverse sample of 70 early adolescents (51 % female) and their mothers participated in this multimethod investigation. Adolescent reports of parental consulting, but not mother or observer reports, were significantly associated with adolescent reports of four psychosocial outcomes. Recognizing that comparison of equivalent regression models can inform interpretations of the data such as the monomethod associations found in this study, this article describes and discusses a strategy for analyzing data from multiple informants. The associations of adolescent reports of parental consulting with loneliness and physical victimization could be fully explained in terms of adolescent bias or other systematic variance uniquely associated with adolescent reports, but those with prosocial behavior and positive friendship quality could not. The view that discrepancies between mother and adolescent reports of parental consulting reflect poor relationship quality appeared most applicable in models of positive friendship quality, somewhat applicable in models of prosocial behavior and physical victimization, and not applicable in models of loneliness. The view that discrepancies might reflect normative and adaptive autonomy was not supported. In addition to adding to our understanding of maternal consulting in regard to peer relationships, it is also hoped that the analytic approach developed for this study will stimulate developments in research that uses multiple informants.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M. (2006). As others see us clinical and research implications of cross-informant correlations for psychopathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 94–98. CrossRef
Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 53, 500–505. CrossRef
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, B. B., & Larson, R. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, vol. 2: Contextual influences on adolescence development (pp. 74–103). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Understanding the effects of physical and relational victimization: The utility of multiple perspectives in predicting social-emotional adjustment. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 147.
De Los Reyes, A. (2011). Introduction to the special section: More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 1–9. CrossRef
De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quinones, K. R. (2010). The longitudinal consistency of mother-child reporting discrepancies or parental monitoring and their ability to predict child delinquent behaviors two years later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1417–1430. CrossRefPubMed
Edwards, J. R. (1994). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20(3), 683–689. CrossRef
Ehrlich, K., Richards, J. M., Lejuez, C. W., & Cassidy, J. (2016). When parents and adolescents disagree about disagreeing: Observed parent-adolescent communication predicts informant discrepancies about conflict. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 380–389. CrossRef
Jager, J., Mahler, A., An, D., Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E, Dodge, K.A., Skinnder, A.T. & Deater-Deckard, K. (2016). Early adolescents’ unique perspectives of maternal and paternal rejection: Examining their across-dyad generalizability and relations with adjustment 1 year later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 2108–2124.
Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Hawk, S. T., Schwartz, S., Frijns, T., Koot, H. M., van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2012). Forbidden friend as forbidden fruit: Parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency. Child Development, 83, 651–666. PubMed
Korelitz, K. E., & Garber, J. (2016). Congruence of parents’ and children’s perceptions of parenting: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 45, 1973–1995. CrossRef
Ladd, G. W., & Pettit, G. S. (2002). Parenting and the development of children’s peer relationships. In M. Bornstein (Ed.). Handbook of parenting, vol. 5: Practical issues in parenting (pp. 269–309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mangold, P. (2010). INTERACT quick start manual V2. 4. www.mangold-international.com.
McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Stephenson, J. C., & Hare, A. L. (2009). Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (pp. 358–403). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mounts, N. S. (2001). Young adolescents’ perceptions of parental management of peer relationships. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(1), 92–122. CrossRef
Mounts, N. S. (2004). Adolescents’ perceptions of parental management of peer relationships in an ethnically diverse sample. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 446–467. CrossRef
Mounts, N. S. (2007). Adolescents’ and their mothers’ perceptions of parental management of peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 169–178. CrossRef
Parker, J., & Asher, S. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621. CrossRef
Poulin, F., Nadeau, K., & Scaramella, L. V. (2012). The role of parents in young adolescents’ competence with peers: An observational study of advice giving and intrusiveness. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58(4), 437–462. CrossRef
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Guerry, J. D., & Browne, C. B. (2009). Peer reputations and psychosocial adjustment. In K. H. Rubin, M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 548–567). New York, NY: Guilford.
Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438. CrossRef
Thomas, K. K., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Rejection sensitivity and adjustment during adolescence: Do friendship self-silencing and parent support matter? Journal of Child & Family Studies, 24, 608–616. CrossRef
Valdes, O. M., Laursen, B., Guimond, F. A., Hartl, A. C., & Denner, J. (2016). Maternal psychological control and its associations with mother and child perceptions of adolescent adjustment: More evidence on the strength of shared perspective. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 45, 2151–2163. CrossRef
Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., & Bukowski, W. M. (2009). The role of friendship in child and adolescent psychosocial development. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 568–588). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Yaban, E. H., Sayil, M., & Tepe, Y. K. (2014). Are discrepancies in perceptions of psychological control related to maladjustment? A study of adolescents and their parents in Turkey. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 550–562. CrossRef
- Method Variance in Adolescents’, Mothers’, and Observers’ Reports of Peer Management: Nuisance or Information?
David P. Valentiner
Nina S. Mounts
- Springer US