Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
An accommodative coping style (e.g. acceptance) is related to a better mental health-related quality of life (MHQL) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We want to explore whether neuroticism is predictive for this coping style and MHQL.
Secondly we want to explore the relation between acceptance and physical health-related quality of life (PHQL) and expect that illness-related variables such as fatigue severity and duration are related to PHQL.
In this cross-sectional study, 117 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome from an outpatient internal medicine clinic completed self-report questionnaires on quality of life (SF-36), acceptance (ICQ), personality traits (NEO-FFI) and fatigue severity (CIS).
Regression analyses showed that neuroticism and acceptance are predictors of MHQL (38% of the variance was explained). The path analysis showed that acceptance mediates between neuroticism and MHQL and that PHQL is related to MHQL. PHQL is related to fatigue severity and duration, but not to neuroticism and acceptance.
Stimulating an ‘accepting accommodative coping style’ within the treatment for CFS is important in improving mental quality of life. Our results suggest that neuroticism may be negatively related to acceptance and MHQL. This findings support the idea that a psychological diagnostic workout with special attention to personality traits in relation to their coping style is recommended in order to choose the most appropriate therapeutic approach in this population.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Fukuda, K., Straus, S., Hickie, I., Sharpe, M., Dobbins, J., & Komaroff, A. (1994). The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121, 953–959. PubMed
Dancey, C. P., & Friend, J. (2008). Symptoms, impairment and illness intrusiveness—their relationship with depression in women with CFS/ME. Psychology and Health, 23, 983–989. CrossRef
Brandstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2002). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22, 117–150. CrossRef
Hamilton, N. A., Karoly, P., & Kitzman, H. (2004). Self-regulation and chronic pain: The role of emotion. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 559–576. CrossRef
Dickson, A., Knussen, C., & Flowers, P. (2008). ‘That was my old life; it’s almost like a past-life now: Identity crisis, loss and adjustment amongst people living with CFS. Psychology and Health, 23, 459–476. CrossRef
Bazelmans, E., Prins, J., & Bleijenberg, G. (2006). Cognitive behavior therapy for relatively active and for passive chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Cognitive Behavioural Practice, 13, 157–166. CrossRef
Wyller, V. (2007). The chronic fatigue syndrome—an update. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 115, 7–14. CrossRef
Van Campen, E., Van Den Eede, F., Moorkens, G., Schotte, C., Schacht, R., Sabbe, B., et al. (2009). Use of the temperament and character inventory (TCI) for assessment of personality in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatic, 50, 147–154. CrossRef
Van Geelen, S., Sinnema, G., Hermans, H., & Kuis, W. (2007). Personality and chronic fatigue syndrome: Methodological and conceptual issues. Clinical Psychological Review, 27, 885–903. CrossRef
Luyten, P., Van Houdenhove, B., Cosyns, N., & Van den Broeck, A. (2006). Are patients with chronic fatigue syndrome perfectionistic or were they? A case control study. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1473–1483. CrossRef
Frost, R., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468. CrossRef
Magnusson, A., Nias, D., & White, P. (1996). Is perfectionism associated with fatigue? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 4, 37–83.
Eysenck, H., & Eysenck, S. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck personality scales. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Connor-Smith, J., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1080–1107. CrossRef
Shoji, K., Harrigan, J., Woll, S., & Miller, S. (2010). Interactions among situations, neuroticism, and appraisals in coping strategy choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 270–276. CrossRef
Carver, C., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review Psychology;, 61, 679–704. CrossRef
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Personality Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & de Fruyt, F. (1996). Handleiding NEO persoonlijkheids-vragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI. Lisse: Swets Test Services.
De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1998). The assessment of the big five in the Dutch language domain. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 1–22.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1990). Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 362–371. CrossRef
Vercoulen, J., Alberts, M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1999). De checklist individual strenght (CIS). Gedragstherapie, 32, 131–136.
Vercoulen, J., Swanink, C., Galama, J., Fennis, J., Jongen, P., Hommers, O., et al. (1998). The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: Development of a model. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 6, 507–517. CrossRef
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Aiken, K. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bollen, K., & Long, J. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). In LISREL VI users guide (3rd ed .). Moorsville: Scientific Software.
Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (1998). Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
Johnson, S. K., Gil-Rivas, V., & Schmaling, K. B. (2008). Coping strategies in chronic fatigue syndrome: Outcomes over time. Stress Health, 24, 305–312. CrossRef
Gomez, R., Holmberg, K., Bounds, J., Fullarton, C., & Gomez, A. (1999). Neuroticism and extraversion as predictors of coping styles during early adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 3–17. CrossRef
Grant, S., & Langan-Fox, J. (2006). Occupational stress, coping and strain: The combined/interactive effect of the Big Five traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 719–732. CrossRef
Roesch, S., Wee, C., & Vaughn, A. (2006). Relations between the Big Five personality traits and dispositional coping in Korean Americans: acculturation as a moderating factor. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 85–96. CrossRef
Gallagher, D. (1990). Extraversion, neuroticism and appraisal of stressful academic events. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1053–1057. CrossRef
Fukuda, S., Kuratsune, H., Tajima, S., Takashima, S., Yamagutchi, K., Nishizawa, Y., et al. (2010). Premorbid personality in chronic fatigue syndrome as determined by the temperament and character Inventory. Comprehensive Psychiatr, 51, 78–85. CrossRef
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1986). Personality, coping and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 386–405.
- Mental quality of life in chronic fatigue is associated with an accommodative coping style and neuroticism: a path analysis
- Springer Netherlands