Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Although it is widely accepted that mental illnesses affect millions of people worldwide, there is still disagreement among scholars about the facts of mental illness. The orthodox position is that mental illness is a fact; critics argue that it is a myth. Thomas Szasz was perhaps the most influential critic of mental illness while Albert Ellis was one of the most influential psychotherapists of the twentieth century. Yet, they disagreed about the facts of mental illness. Ellis argued that mental illness is a fact; Szasz argued that mental illness is a metaphor that we have mistaken for a fact. Both men were practicing psychotherapists: Ellis developed Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and treated mentally ill clients as irrational thinkers; Szasz developed Autonomous Psychotherapy and treated clients as existential game-players who choose, or have been coerced into, the role of sick patient. Szasz vehemently disagreed with Ellis’s view that some people with serious mental illnesses should be institutionalized and treated against their will. While Ellis argued that mental illness is a convenient label for people who are a danger to themselves and others, Szasz argued that mental illness is a metaphor for moral problems in living and involuntary institutionalization and treatment are crimes against humanity. This paper, then, revisits the debate between Ellis and Szasz on the vexed topic of mental illness.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association. CrossRef
Burstow, B. (2015). Psychiatry and the business of madness: An ethical and epistemological accounting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Cohen, B. M. (2016). Psychiatric hegemony. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Davies, J. (2013). Cracked: Why psychiatry is doing more harm than good. London: Icon Books.
Ellis, A. (1957a). Rational psychotherapy and individual psychology. Journal of Individual Psychology, 13(1), 38–44.
Ellis, A. (1957b). How to live with a neurotic. New York: Crown.
Ellis, A. (1967). Should some people be labelled mentally ill? Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 435–436. CrossRef
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ellis, A. (1977) . Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
Ellis, A. (1980). The fact of mental illness. Rational Living, 15(2), 13–19.
Ellis, A. (2004). The road to tolerance. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Ellis, A. (2010). All out! An autobiography. New York: Prometheus Books.
Ellis, A., & Szasz, T. (1977). (DVD) A debate between Albert Ellis and Thomas Szasz: Mental illness, fact or myth?. Baldwin, N.Y.: William E. Simon.
Hospers, J. (1956). An introduction to philosophical analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Insel, T. (2013). Director’s blog: Transforming diagnosis. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml.
Jacobs, S. (1989). Karl Popper and Albert Ellis: Their ideas on psychology and rationality compared. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 7(3), 173–185. CrossRef
Kirk, S. A., Cohen, D., & Gomory, T. (2015). DSM-5: The delayed demise of descriptive diagnosis. In S. Demazeux & P. Singy (Eds.), The DSM-5 in perspective: Philosophical reflections on the psychiatric babel. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
Kupfer, D. J. (2013). Chair of DSM-5 task force discusses future of mental health research. Public statement, released May 6.
Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy: DSM: The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders. London: Constable.
Mead, G. H. (1934). In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43. CrossRef
Ryle, G. (1983) . The concept of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Schaler, J. A. (Ed.). (2004). Szasz under fire: The psychiatric abolitionist faces his critics. La Salle: Open Court.
Spillane, R. (1980). RET’s contribution: An argument for argument. Rational Living, 15(2), 3–7.
Szasz, T. S. (1965). The ethics of psychoanalysis: The theory and method of autonomous psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Szasz, T. S. (1973). Ideology and insanity: Essays on the psychiatric dehumanization of man. New York: Marion Boyars.
Szasz, T. (1987). Insanity: The idea and its consequences. New York: Wiley.
Szasz, T. (1996). The meaning of mind: Language, morality and neuroscience. Praeger: Westport Connecticut.
Szasz, T. (2004). Faith in freedom: Libertarian principles and psychiatric practices. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Szasz, T. (2007). The medicalization of everyday life. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Szasz, T. (2008). Psychiatry: The science of lies. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Szasz, T. S. (2010) . The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Harper Perennial.
Tolman, C. W. (Ed.). (1992). Positivism in psychology: Historical and contemporary problems. New York: Springer.
Whitaker, R., & Cosgrove, L. (2015). Psychiatry under the influence: Institutional corruption, social injury, and prescriptions for reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
- Mental Illness: Fact or Myth? Revisiting the Debate Between Albert Ellis and Thomas Szasz
- Springer US
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Print ISSN: 0894-9085
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6563