Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Enacting action phrases in subject-performed tasks (SPTs) leads to better free recall than hearing or reading the same materials in verbal tasks (VTs). This enactment effect is usually explained by better item-specific information in SPTs than in VTs. The role of relational information is controversial. In the present paper, we will take the multiple recall approach to study the role of item and relational information in memory for actions by computing the number of item gains and the number of item losses over trials. This approach has previously been applied to lists of unrelated action phrases. We applied it to categorically related lists, also allowing a measure of relational information by clustering scores. It was found that SPTs produced more item gains than VTs. This finding confirmed the assumption that SPTs provide better item-specific information than VTs. The number of item losses did not differ between VTs and SPTs. This finding suggests that relational information is equally provided by VTs and SPTs. However, the organizational scores showed a more differentiated picture. Clustering was greater in SPTs than in VTs with randomly presented lists, but not with blocked lists. We suggested that these results, as well as other findings from the literature, could be explained by distinguishing automatic and strategic processes and the types of item associations that are addressed by these processes.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.
Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L. G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events. Memory & Cognition, 14, 339–346.
Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229–240.
Burns, D. J. (1993). Item gains and item losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 163–173.
Burns, D. J., & Gold, D. E. (1999). An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 978–985.
Burns, D. J., & Schoff, K. M. (1998). Slow and steady often ties the race: Effects of item-specific and relational processing on cumulative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1041–1051.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.
Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.
Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L. G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Animal learning and human memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588–598. CrossRef
Engelkamp, J. (1986). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects. Psychological Research, 48, 153–159.
Engelkamp, J. (1988). Modality-specific encoding and word class in verbal learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Snykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 415–420). Chichester: Wiley.
Engelkamp, J. (1995). Visual imagery and enactment in memory of actions. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 227–240. PubMed
Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove: Psychology Press.
Engelkamp, J. & Seiler, K. (2003). Gains and losses in action memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 829–848.
Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1996). Organization and recall in verbal tasks and in subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 257–273. CrossRef
Engelkamp, J., Mohr, G., & Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs. Psychological Research, 53, 232–239.
Engelkamp, J., Jahn, P., & Seiler, K. H. (2003). The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: The role of order information in free recall. Psychological Research, 67, 280–290. PubMed
Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2003). Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Gollin, E. S., & Sharps, M. J. (1988). Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type. Memory & Cognition, 16, 539–544.
Golly-Häring, C., & Engelkamp, J. (2003). Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 965–975.
Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68. CrossRef
Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445. CrossRef
Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1192–1197.
Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subject-performed actions. Psychological Research, 53, 203–565.
Koriat, A., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2003). Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 435–454. CrossRef
Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 337–363.
MacLeod, C. M., & Bassili, J. N. (1989). Are implicit and explicit tests differentially sensitive to item-specific versus relational information? In S. Lewandowsky & J. C. Dunn (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 159–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, J. M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.) Memory, organization and structure (pp. 303–317). New York: Academic Press.
McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., & Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 173–185.
McDaniel, M. A., DeLosh, E. L., & Merritt, P. (2000). Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: Recall of common versus bizarre material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422–435.
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645–656.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. PubMed
Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts. Psychological Research, 51, 181–187.
Mulligan, N. (2000). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 28, 539–546.
Mulligan, N. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 436–450.
Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., & Widener, R. J., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 13, 183–191.
Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 702–709.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
Nilsson, L. G., Nyberg, L., Klingberg, F., Åberg, C., Persson, J., & Roland, P. E. (2000). Activity in motor areas while remembering action events. Neuro Report, 11, 2199–2201.
Norris, M., & West, R. (1993). Activity memory and aging: The role of motor retrieval and strategic processing. Psychology and Aging, 8, 81–86. PubMed
Nyberg, L., Petersson, K. M., Nilsson, L. G., Sandblom, J., Åberg, C., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions. NeuroImage, 20, 1–8.
Olofsson, U. (1997). Win some, lose some: Hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing. Memory & Cognition, 25, 797–800.
Roencker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.
Seiler, K., & Engelkamp, J. (2003). The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 954–964. CrossRef
Serra, M., & Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34–40.
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 431–446. CrossRef
Sternberg, R. J., & Tulving, E. (1977). The measurement of subjective organization in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 539–556. CrossRef
Wippich, W. (1980). Bildhaftigkeit und Organisation: Untersuchungen zu einer differenzierten Organisationshypothese. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff.
Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words: Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, et al. (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151–198). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989). Does motor encoding enhance relational information? Psychological Research, 51, 158–167.
Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1999). Levels of processing effects in subject-performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 907–914.
Zimmer, H. D., & Mohr, M. (1986). Organisation und Organisierbarkeit von Verben und Substantiven bei einer verbal-semantischen bzw. ‘modalitätsspezifischen’ Lernweise (Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie Nr. 100). [Organisation and facilities of organisation of verbs and nouns after semantic or modality-specific encoding.] Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.
Zimmer, H. D., Helstrup, T., & Engelkamp, J. (2000). Pop-out into memory: A retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 658–670. CrossRef
- Memory for actions: Item and relational information in categorized lists
Kerstin H. Seiler
Hubert D. Zimmer