Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

16-07-2024

Measuring what matters to older persons for active living: part II cross-sectional validity evidence for OPAL measure across four countries

Auteurs: Nancy E. Mayo, Mohammad Auais, Ruth Barclay, Joan Branin, Helen Dawes, Ida J. Korfage, Kim Sawchuk, Eran Tal, Carole L. White, Zain Ayoubi, Ezinne Ekediegwu, Kedar Mate, Lyne Nadeau, Sebastian Rodriguez Duque, Ayse Kuspinar

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Introduction

Through interviews with 148 older persons from four countries and in four languages, the content for a 17-item measure of active living was developed. The purpose of this paper is to present further evidence of the extent to which this new measure, Older Persons Active Living (OPAL), is “fit-for-purpose” for measuring the extent of active living at one point in time.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out on a population aged 65 + and living independently, drawn from a participant panel, HostedinCanada, sampling people from Canada, United States, United Kingdom, and Netherlands. The survey instrument comprised the OPAL questionnaire rated on importance and frequency, sociodemographics, and information on physical and mental function. The argument-based approach to validity framed the analyses. Logistic regression, structural equation modeling, ordinary least-squares regression, and correlation were used to generate estimates for parameters underpinning validity evidence.

Results

A total of 1612 people completed the survey, 100 to 400 people across the 6 country-language strata. The proportion of people rating the items as extremely or quite important ranged from 60 to 90%, with no important differences between men and women and few differences between strata. A single-factor structure was supported. The ordinality of the response options justified an additive total score yielding a near normal distribution (mean: 33.1; SD: 11.5; range 0–51). Correlations with other measures of converging constructs were of moderate strength (~ 0.50), and differences across groups known to affect functioning and health were observed, suggesting a Miminal Important Difference (MID) of 6 out of 51.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide evidence that the 17-item OPAL measure is fit for the purpose of estimating the extent to which older persons are living actively at one point in time.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging: A policy framework. World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging: A policy framework.
2.
go back to reference Salbach, N. M., Barclay, R., Webber, S. C., Jones, C. A., Mayo, N. E., Lix, L. M., et al. (2019). A theory-based, task-oriented, outdoor walking programme for older adults with difficulty walking outdoors: Protocol for the Getting Older Adults Outdoors (GO-OUT) randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal Open, 9(4), e029393. Salbach, N. M., Barclay, R., Webber, S. C., Jones, C. A., Mayo, N. E., Lix, L. M., et al. (2019). A theory-based, task-oriented, outdoor walking programme for older adults with difficulty walking outdoors: Protocol for the Getting Older Adults Outdoors (GO-OUT) randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal Open, 9(4), e029393.
4.
go back to reference Kaundinya, T., & Schroth, S. (2022). Dismantle ableism, accept disability: Making the case for anti-ableism in medical education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 9, 23821205221076660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaundinya, T., & Schroth, S. (2022). Dismantle ableism, accept disability: Making the case for anti-ableism in medical education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 9, 23821205221076660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Titchkosky, T. (2003). Disability, self, and society. University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Titchkosky, T. (2003). Disability, self, and society. University of Toronto Press.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cole, T. R. (1992). The journey of life: A cultural history of aging in America. Cambridge University Press. Cole, T. R. (1992). The journey of life: A cultural history of aging in America. Cambridge University Press.
7.
go back to reference Peterson, C. H., Gischlar, K. L., & Peterson, N. A. (2017). Item construction using reflective, formative, or Rasch measurement models: Implications for group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 42(1), 17–32.CrossRef Peterson, C. H., Gischlar, K. L., & Peterson, N. A. (2017). Item construction using reflective, formative, or Rasch measurement models: Implications for group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 42(1), 17–32.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stenner, A. J., Burdick, D. S., & Stone, M. H. (2008). Formative and reflective models: Can a Rasch analysis tell the difference? Rasch Measurement Transactions., 22(1), 1152–1153. Stenner, A. J., Burdick, D. S., & Stone, M. H. (2008). Formative and reflective models: Can a Rasch analysis tell the difference? Rasch Measurement Transactions., 22(1), 1152–1153.
9.
go back to reference Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., & Tavani, J.-L. (2019). Are reflective models appropriate for very short scales? Proofs of concept of formative models using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality., 87(2), 363–372.CrossRefPubMed Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., & Tavani, J.-L. (2019). Are reflective models appropriate for very short scales? Proofs of concept of formative models using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality., 87(2), 363–372.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2022). Patient-focused drug development: Selecting, developing, or modifying fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2022). Patient-focused drug development: Selecting, developing, or modifying fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments.
11.
go back to reference American Educational Research Association. (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. American Educational Research Association. (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
12.
go back to reference Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review., 42(4), 448–457.CrossRef Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review., 42(4), 448–457.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hawkins, M., Elsworth, G. R., Nolte, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2021). Validity arguments for patient-reported outcomes: Justifying the intended interpretation and use of data. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5(1), 64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hawkins, M., Elsworth, G. R., Nolte, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2021). Validity arguments for patient-reported outcomes: Justifying the intended interpretation and use of data. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5(1), 64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 2018(9), 2207–2230.CrossRef Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 2018(9), 2207–2230.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., et al. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146–M156.CrossRefPubMed Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., et al. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146–M156.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rockwood, K., Song, X., MacKnight, C., Bergman, H., Hogan, D. B., McDowell, I., & Mitnitski, A. (2005). A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(5), 489–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rockwood, K., Song, X., MacKnight, C., Bergman, H., Hogan, D. B., McDowell, I., & Mitnitski, A. (2005). A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(5), 489–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Mayo, N. E., Aubertin-Leheudre, M., Mate, K., Figueiredo, S., Fiore, J. F., Jr., Auais, M., et al. (2023). Development of a frailty ladder using rasch analysis: If the shoe fits. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 26(1), 133–143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mayo, N. E., Aubertin-Leheudre, M., Mate, K., Figueiredo, S., Fiore, J. F., Jr., Auais, M., et al. (2023). Development of a frailty ladder using rasch analysis: If the shoe fits. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 26(1), 133–143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Cesari, M., Araujo, D. C. I., Amuthavalli, T. J., Cooper, C., Martin, F. C., Reginster, J. Y., et al. (2018). Evidence for the domains supporting the construct of intrinsic capacity. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, 73, 1653–1660.CrossRef Cesari, M., Araujo, D. C. I., Amuthavalli, T. J., Cooper, C., Martin, F. C., Reginster, J. Y., et al. (2018). Evidence for the domains supporting the construct of intrinsic capacity. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, 73, 1653–1660.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mayo, N. E. (2015). Dictionary of quality of life and health outcomes measurement. International Society for Quality of Life. Mayo, N. E. (2015). Dictionary of quality of life and health outcomes measurement. International Society for Quality of Life.
20.
go back to reference Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mutebi, A., Slack, M., Warholak, T. L., Hudgens, S., & Coons, S. J. (2016). Interpretation of verbal descriptors for response options commonly used in verbal rating scales in patient-reported outcome instruments. Quality of Life Research, 25(12), 3181–3189.CrossRefPubMed Mutebi, A., Slack, M., Warholak, T. L., Hudgens, S., & Coons, S. J. (2016). Interpretation of verbal descriptors for response options commonly used in verbal rating scales in patient-reported outcome instruments. Quality of Life Research, 25(12), 3181–3189.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Lott, S. A., & Riddle, D. L. (1999). The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Physical Therapy, 79(4), 371–383.PubMed Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Lott, S. A., & Riddle, D. L. (1999). The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Physical Therapy, 79(4), 371–383.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Askari, S., Fellows, L. K., Brouillette, M. J., & Mayo, N. E. (2021). Development and validation of a voice-of-the-patient measure of cognitive concerns experienced by people living with HIV. Quality of Life Research, 30(3), 921–930.CrossRefPubMed Askari, S., Fellows, L. K., Brouillette, M. J., & Mayo, N. E. (2021). Development and validation of a voice-of-the-patient measure of cognitive concerns experienced by people living with HIV. Quality of Life Research, 30(3), 921–930.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Topp, C. W., Ostergaard, S. D., Sondergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176.CrossRefPubMed Topp, C. W., Ostergaard, S. D., Sondergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Austin, P. C. (2009). Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation., 38(6), 1228–1234.CrossRef Austin, P. C. (2009). Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation., 38(6), 1228–1234.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
28.
go back to reference Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246.CrossRef Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.CrossRef Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bowling, A., Hankins, M., Windle, G., Bilotta, C., & Grant, R. (2013). A short measure of quality of life in older age: The performance of the brief Older People’s Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(1), 181–187.CrossRefPubMed Bowling, A., Hankins, M., Windle, G., Bilotta, C., & Grant, R. (2013). A short measure of quality of life in older age: The performance of the brief Older People’s Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(1), 181–187.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Rose, A. J., Bayliss, E., Huang, W., Baseman, L., Butcher, E., Garcia, R. E., & Edelen, M. O. (2018). Evaluating the PROMIS-29 v20 for use among older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Quality of Life Research, 27(11), 2935–2944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rose, A. J., Bayliss, E., Huang, W., Baseman, L., Butcher, E., Garcia, R. E., & Edelen, M. O. (2018). Evaluating the PROMIS-29 v20 for use among older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Quality of Life Research, 27(11), 2935–2944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Measuring what matters to older persons for active living: part II cross-sectional validity evidence for OPAL measure across four countries
Auteurs
Nancy E. Mayo
Mohammad Auais
Ruth Barclay
Joan Branin
Helen Dawes
Ida J. Korfage
Kim Sawchuk
Eran Tal
Carole L. White
Zain Ayoubi
Ezinne Ekediegwu
Kedar Mate
Lyne Nadeau
Sebastian Rodriguez Duque
Ayse Kuspinar
Publicatiedatum
16-07-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03720-1