Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Fuzzy set theory (FST) can improve various aspects of measurement with questionnaires. However, very little is known about how to use FST to measure quality of life (QOL). The main purpose of our study was to find an appropriate fuzzy measure for QOL that, while demonstrating the advantages of FST, can also be compared with mainstream QOL measures, most of which use traditional Likert-type scales.
Referring to the literature on fuzzy scoring methods, we first revised the measurement scale and scoring method of the traditional WHOQOL-BREF (i.e., a five-point Likert-type scale) to create three versions of a fuzzy WHOQOL-BREF. Then, we examined the psychometric relationships of these three fuzzy measures and the traditional WHOQOL-BREF in a within-subject design.
Our results show that a fuzzy-scales weighted-by-membership (FSWM) version of the WHOQOL-BREF is comparable to the traditional WHOQOL-BREF in that it accepts strong invariance and shows almost perfect agreement. It also demonstrates higher reliability and face validity than the traditional WHOQOL-BREF.
We recommend that future studies examine the use of FSWM to measure QOL.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Aooletion-Centry-Crofts.
Rabius, P. V., & Black, B. S. (2007). Measuring quality of life in dementia: Purposes, goals, challenges and progress. International Psychogeriatrics, 19(3), 401–407. CrossRef
Smithson, M. (1987). Fuzzy set analysis for behavior and social science. New York: Springer. CrossRef
Brown, S. J., & Morley, A. M. (2007). Risk perception, fuzzy representations and comparative optimism. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 578–587. CrossRef
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–352. CrossRef
Yu, S. C., & Yu, M. M. (2007). Fuzzy partial credit scaling: A more valid approach to scoring beck depression inventory II. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(9), 1163–1172. CrossRef
Pryor, R. G., Hesketh, B., & Gleitzman, M. (1989). Making things clearer by making them fuzzy: Counseling illustrations of a fuzzy graphic rating scale. The Career Development Quarterly, 38(2), 136–147. CrossRef
Hesketh, B., Pryor, R., & Gleitzman, M., & Hesketh, T. (1988). Practical applications and psychometric evaluation of a computerized fuzzy graphic ration scale. In: T. Zetenyi (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets in Psychology (pp. 425–454). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Lin, Y. H. (2002). The construction of fuzzy linguistics numbers for questionnaire and its empirical study. Survey Research-Method and Application, 11, 31–68.
Costas, C. S. L., Maranon, P. P., & Cabrera, J. A. H. (1994). Application of diffuse measurement to the evaluation of psychological structures. Quality and Quantity, 28(3), 305–313. CrossRef
The WHOQOL-Taiwan Group. (2005). The User’s Manual of the Development of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version (2nd ed.). Taipei: Taiwan WHOQOL Group.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620. CrossRef
Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203. CrossRef
Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problem with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 369–403. CrossRef
Hollen, P. J., Gralla, R. J., Kris, M. G., McCoy, S., Donaldson, D. W., & Moinpour, C. M. (2005). A comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scale formats for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): Does format affect patient ratings of symptoms and quality of life? Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 837–847. CrossRefPubMed
Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM Measurement Invariance Analysis. Mplus Web Notes, http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote17.pdf.
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. CrossRef
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. CrossRef
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76. CrossRef
- Measuring quality of life with fuzzy numbers: in the perspectives of reliability, validity, measurement invariance, and feasibility
- Springer International Publishing