Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) is a widely used four-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure. Evaluations of this instrument are limited, restraining user’s confidence in the instrument. This study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the ICIQ-UI-SF on a sample of urological surgery patients in Canada.
One hundred and seventy-seven surgical patients with stress urinary incontinence completed the ICIQ-UI-SF pre-operatively. Methods drawing from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), measures of reliability, item response theory (IRT), and differential item functioning were applied. Ceiling effects were examined.
Ceiling effects were identified. In the CFA, the factor loadings of items one and two differed significantly (p < 0.001) from item three indicating possible multidimensionality. The first two items reflect symptom severity not quality of life. Reliability was moderate as measured by Cronbach’s alpha (0.63) and McDonald’s coefficient (0.65). The IRT found the instrument does not discriminate between individuals with low incontinence-related quality of life.
Due to low/moderate reliability, the ICIQ-UI-SF can be used as a complement to other data or used to report aggregated surgical outcomes among surgical patients. If the primary objective is to measure quality of life, other PROs should be considered.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Kwon, B. E., Kim, G. Y., Son, Y. J., Roh, Y. S., & You, M. A. (2010). Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: A systematic literature review. International Neurourology Journal, 14, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2010.14.3.133. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Donovan, J., Badia, X., Corcos, M., Gotoh, M., Kelleher, C., Naughton, M., et al. (2003). Symptom and quality of life assessment. In L. Cardozo, S. Khoury, A. Wein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence Health (pp. 519–584). Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd.
Pereira, S. B., Thiel, R. D. R. C., Riccetto, C., da Silva, J.M., Pereira, L. C., Herrmann, V., et al. (2010). Validation of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire overactive bladder (ICIQ-OAB) for Portuguese. Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia, 32, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032010000600004. CrossRefPubMed
Hamilton, D. F., Giesinger, J. M., MacDonald, D. J., Simpson, A. H. R. W., Howie, C. R., & Giesinger, K. (2016). Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 following total hip arthroplasty. Bone & Joint Research, 5, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.53.2000480. CrossRef
Tamanini, J. T. N., Dambros, M., D’Ancona, C. A. L., César, P. J. N., Palma, R., & Rodrigues, N. (2004). Validation of the “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form” (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese. Revista de Saúde Pública. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000300015. PubMedCrossRef
Vincent, K., & Sutherland, J. M. .(2013). A review of methods for deriving an index for socioeconomic status in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Elkin, E. (2012). Are you in need of validation? Psychometric evaluation of questionnaires using SAS. In SAS Global Forum (pp. 1–9).
Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. CrossRef
Baker F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd edn.). Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
Tincello, D., Sculpher, M., Tunn, R., Quail, D., Van Der Vaart, H., Falconer, C., et al. (2010). Patient characteristics impacting health state index scores, measured by the EQ-5D of females with stress urinary incontinence symptoms. Value in Health, 13, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00599.x. CrossRefPubMed
Mallah, F., Montazeri, A., Ghanbari, Z., Tavoli, A., Haghollahi, F., & Aziminekoo, E. (2014). Effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life among Iranian women. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 8, 13–19.
Hajjar, R. R. (2004). Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in the elderly population. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 20, 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2004.04.009. CrossRefPubMed
Chiaffarino, F., Parazzini, F., Lavezzari, M., & Giambanco, V. (2003). Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder on quality of life. European Urology, 43, 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00097-6. CrossRefPubMed
Hajebrahimi, S., Corcos, J., & Lemieux, M. C. (2004). International consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form: Comparison of physician versus patient completion and immediate and delayed self-administration. Urology, 63, 1076–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.005. CrossRefPubMed
Patrick, D., Martin, M., Bushnell, D., Yalcin, I., Wagner, T., & Buesching, D. (1999). Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: Further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology, 53, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3. CrossRefPubMed
- Measuring quality of life in patients with stress urinary incontinence: is the ICIQ-UI-SF adequate?
Jason M. Sutherland
- Springer International Publishing