Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
All participants in this study have provided written informed consent as required by the University of California at Los Angeles Institutional Review Board.
With growing interest in cross-cultural and multicultural cancer-related quality of life studies, the need to assess reliability and validity of quality of life measures for linguistically and culturally diverse cancer survivors is pressing.
Reliability and validity of the English and Spanish versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-G subscales were tested with a sample of English-speaking European American (n = 273) and ethnic minority American (n = 194), and Spanish-speaking Latina (n = 199) cervical cancer survivors in the U.S.
Reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) were 0.76 or higher across ethnic/linguistic groups except for the emotional wellbeing subscale among Spanish-speaking Latinas (α = 0.64). Factor analyses demonstrated overall measurement equivalence across groups with some ethnic/linguistic variations: there were greater differences between linguistic groups than between ethnic groups. Additionally, the scale’s factor structure was less satisfactory for Spanish-speaking Latinas. The subscales had good concurrent validity with appropriate subscales of the Short Form (SF)-12 and Rand/SF-36 General Health subscale (Pearson’s r 0.53–0.66), suggesting each subscale was assessing its intended construct.
The overall psychometric properties of the FACT-G were cross-culturally equivalent. However, more validation studies are needed for non-English speaking populations particularly with emotional wellbeing. In addition, disaggregated analyses on linguistic groups are recommended unless cross-cultural equivalence is established.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Shumaker, S. A., & Naughton, M. J. (1995). The international assessment of health-related quality of life: A theoretical perspective. In S. A. Shumaker & R. A. Berzon (Eds.), The international assessment of health-related quality of life: Theory, translation, measurement and analysis (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Rapid Communication.
Stewart, A. L., & Napoles-Springer, A. (2000). Health-related quality of life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl II), II-102–II-124.
Cella, D. F. (1997). Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement. Evanston: Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE).
Cella, D., Tulsky, D., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579. PubMed
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) quality of life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 974–986. PubMed
Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (1998). Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment, 51(11), 1171–1178.
STATA. (2000). STATA reference manual. College Station: STATA Press.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thomson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wallston, K. A., Stein, M. J., & Smith, C. A. (1994). Form C of the MHLC scales: A condition-specific measure of locus of control. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.
- Measuring quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: preliminary assessment of instrumentation validity in a cross-cultural study
Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa
Judith S. Tejero
- Springer Netherlands