Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Mindfulness can be conceptualized as either a state or a trait, but currently, there is no reliable psychometric method to distinguish clearly between the two in psychological measures. Notwithstanding the clinical effectiveness of mindfulness, any specific element of mindfulness treatment can only be evaluated by comparing state and trait changes using techniques that allow such changes to be measured. Generalizability Theory (GT) is a suitable method to differentiate between state and trait variance components, and its application is illustrated here with an empirical example using the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS). Person × occasion interaction is a marker of individual state changes and should explain the largest amount of variance in a valid state measure. To assess state variability, data were collected on three separate occasions: (i) after a holiday, (ii) immediately after a mindfulness exercise, and (iii) before a stressful event (i.e., exam). Generalizability analysis was applied to examine sources of true and error variances. The TMS captured a larger amount of variance attributed to a state and only a small amount associated with trait mindfulness, which is consistent with the purpose of the measure. This study has demonstrated that Generalizability Theory can be usefully applied to distinguish between state and trait components in a measure, and it is recommended as an appropriate psychometric method to validate state and trait measurement tools. These findings have far-reaching implications to improve the accuracy of the distinction between state and trait in mindfulness measurement and other areas of psychological assessment.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Allal, L., & Cardinet, J. (1976). Application of generalizability theory: estimation of errors and adaptation of measurement designs. Neuchâtel: Institut Romand de Recherche et de documentation pédagogiques.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction on to measurement theory. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–142.
Brennan, R. L. (1977). Generalizability analysis: principles and procedures. Iowa City: The American College Testing Program.
Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of generalizability theory (2nd ed.). Iowa City: ACT Publications.
Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag Publishing. CrossRef
Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44, 1378–1388. CrossRef
Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: a liberation of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, XVII(2), 137–163. CrossRef
Davis, K. M., Lau, M. A., & Cairns, D. R. (2009). Development and preliminary validation of a trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 185–197. CrossRef
Epstein, S. (1984). Trait theory as personality theory: can a part be as great as the whole? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 120–122. CrossRef
Fisher, R. A. (1925). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. In: statistical methods for research workers. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications for Genesis Pub.
Gardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2009). Applying generalizability theory using EduG. New York: Routledge.
Geiser, C., Litson, K., Bishop, J., Keller, B. T., Burns, G. L., & Servera, M. (2015). Analyzing person, situation and person - situation interaction effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations.
Hamaker, E. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. (2007). The integrated trait-state model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 295–315. CrossRef
Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (Eds.). (2001). Trait–state models for longitudinal data. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Ramanaiah, N. V., Franzen, M., & Schill, T. (1983). A psychometric study of the State-Trait Anxiety inventory. Personality Assessment, 47, 531–535. CrossRef
Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Shavelson, R. G., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 599–612. CrossRef
Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004). Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13, 251–271.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Test manual for the state trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the state-trait anger expression inventory-2. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Swiss Society for Research in Education Working Group. (2006). EDUG user guide. Neuchâtel: IRDP.
Williams, M., & Penman, D. (2011). Mindfulness: an eight-week plan to find peace in a frantic world. New York: Rodale Inc..
- Measuring Mindfulness: Applying Generalizability Theory to Distinguish between State and Trait
Oleg N. Medvedev
Christian U. Krägeloh
Richard J. Siegert
- Springer US