Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1572-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The purpose of this article is to describe the psychometric development of the Hemophilia Caregiver Impact measure.
Qualitative interviews (n = 22) and a cross-sectional web-based study (n = 458) were implemented with caregivers of people with hemophilia. Classical test theory and item response theory analyses were implemented to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the measure.
The study sample had a mean age of 39 and a median level of college education. It was predominantly female (88%), and had an average of two children. 85% of this study sample had at least one child with hemophilia. The final 36-item Hemophilia Caregiver Impact measure is composed of seven subscales assessing relevant negative aspects of caregiver impact (Burden Summary) as well as one subscale reflecting a positive aspect of caregiver impact (Positive Emotions). These two summary scores are orthogonal and can be used together in analyses examining negative and positive aspects of caregiver impact. The items included within each subscale reflect a unidimensional construct, demonstrate good item information and trace lines, and lack of local dependence. The resulting subscales demonstrate high reliability, and good construct validity. They show moderate incremental and discriminant validity.
The Hemophilia Caregiver Impact measure is a useful new tool for clinical research on hemophilia. In addition to having eight relevant subscales, the measure can also be summarized with two scores. This versatility can be useful in analyzing studies with very small samples, which is to be expected when dealing with a rare condition like hemophilia.
Hemophilia Facts Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 2016. Retrieved June 13, 2016, from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hemophilia/facts.html.
Kaveney, S. C., Baumstarck, K., Minaya-Flores, P., Shannon, T., Symes, P., Loundou, A., et al. (2016). Validation of the American version of the CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life (CarGOQoL) questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 14(1), 1. CrossRef
Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of life research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 22(8), 1889–1905. CrossRef
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. CrossRef
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer. CrossRef
StataCorp. (2015). In Software S (Ed), Stata: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
Cai, L., Du Toit, S., & Thissen, D. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient in measures of reliability. Educational Psychology Measurement, 33, 613–619. CrossRef
Revicki, D. A., Chen, W.-H., & Tucker, C. (2015). Developing item banks for patient-reported health outcomes. In S. P. Reise & D. A. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling (p. 345). New York: Routledge.
Smyer, M., Reid, J., & Zarit, S. (1990). Successful aging as adaptation to stress. Experimental Aging Research, 17(2), 93–94.
Thorpe, G. L., & Favia, A. (2012). Data analysis using item response theory methodology: An introduction to selected programs and applications.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Measuring hemophilia caregiver burden: validation of the Hemophilia Caregiver Impact measure
Carolyn E. Schwartz
Victoria E. Powell
- Springer International Publishing