Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Measuring the quality of life of family carers ...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

27-04-2019 | Uitgave 8/2019 Open Access

Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument

Tijdschrift:: Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 8/2019

Auteurs:: Agata Łaszewska, Markus Schwab, Eva Leutner, Marold Oberrauter, Georg Spiel, Judit Simon

Extras

» Naar de volledige tekst

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose

The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing compared to the EQ-5D-5L and to test psychometric properties of the German language OxCAP-MH in routine mental health services in Austria.

Methods

Study sample consisted of patients in socio-psychiatric services (n = 159) assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Underlying factors associated with quality-of-life/wellbeing concepts measured by the OxCAP-MH and EQ-5D-5L were identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Responsiveness was assessed using anchor questionnaires and standardised response mean (SRM). For discriminant validity, subgroups of respondents were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Test–retest analysis was assessed for a period of maximum 30 days from the baseline assessment with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

EFA identified a two-factor structure. All EQ-5D-5L items and seven OxCAP-MH items loaded on one factor and nine remaining OxCAP-MH items loaded on a separate factor. Responsiveness was found for patients who improved in anchor questionnaire scores with large or moderate SRM statistics. OxCAP-MH discriminated between various groups in univariable and multivariable analyses. Reliability of the German language OxCAP-MH was confirmed by ICC of 0.80.

Conclusions

Besides providing evidence that the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing constructs beyond traditional health-related quality of life, the study also confirms the validity of the instrument for implementation in routine evaluation of mental health services.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Meer informatie

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 130 kb)

Coast, J., Smith, R. D., & Lorgelly, P. (2008). Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 67(7), 1190–1198. PubMed

Brazier, J. E., Rowen, D., Lloyd, A., & Karimi, M. (2019). Future directions in valuing benefits for estimating QALYs: Is time up for the EQ-5D? Value in Health, 22(1), 62–68. PubMed

Lorgelly, P. K., Lawson, K. D., Fenwick, E. A., & Briggs, A. H. (2010). Outcome measurement in economic evaluations of public health interventions: A role for the capability approach? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(5), 2274–2289. PubMedPubMedCentral

Coast, J., Kinghorn, P., & Mitchell, P. (2014). The development of capability measures in health economics: Opportunities, challenges and progress. Patient, 8(2), 119–126.

Brazier, J. (2010). Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in mental health? British Journal of Psychiatry, 197(5), 348–349. PubMed

Coast, J., Smith, R., & Lorgelly, P. (2008). Should the capability approach be applied in health economics? Health Economics, 17(6), 667–670. PubMed

Simon, J., Anand, P., Gray, A., Rugkasa, J., Yeeles, K., & Burns, T. (2013). Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Social Science and Medicine, 98, 187–196. PubMed

Mitchell, P. M., Al-Janabi, H., Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., & Coast, J. (2015). The relative impacts of disease on health status and capability wellbeing: A multi-country study. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0143590. PubMedPubMedCentral

Lorgelly, P., Lorimer, K., Fenwick, E., & Briggs, A. (2008). The capability approach: Developing an instrument for evaluating public health interventions. Final report. Section of Public Health and Health Policy: University of Glasgow.

10.

Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 445–452. PubMed

11.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nusbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

13.

Mitchell, P. M., Roberts, T. E., Barton, P. M., & Coast, J. (2017). Applications of the capability approach in the health field: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 133(1), 345–371. PubMed

14.

Vergunst, F., Jenkinson, C., Burns, T., Anand, P., Gray, A., Rugkasa, J., et al. (2017). Psychometric validation of a multi-dimensional capability instrument for outcome measurement in mental health research (OxCAP-MH). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 250. PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Al-Janabi, H., Peters, T. J., Brazier, J., Bryan, S., Flynn, T. N., Clemens, S., et al. (2013). An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1831–1840. PubMed

16.

Makai, P., Beckebans, F., van Exel, J., & Brouwer, W. B. (2014). Quality of life of nursing home residents with dementia: Validation of the German version of the ICECAP-O. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e92016. PubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Makai, P., Koopmanschap, M. A., Brouwer, W. B., & Nieboer, A. A. (2013). A validation of the ICECAP-O in a population of post-hospitalized older people in the Netherlands. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 57. PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Malley, J. N., Towers, A.-M., Netten, A. P., Brazier, J. E., Forder, J. E., & Flynn, T. (2012). An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 21. PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Sarabia-Cobo, C. M., Parás-Bravo, P., Amo-Setién, F. J., Alconero-Camarero, A. R., Sáenz-Jalón, M., Torres-Manrique, B., et al. (2017). Validation of the Spanish version of the ICECAP-O for nursing home residents with dementia. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169354. PubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Goranitis, I., Coast, J., Day, E., Copello, A., Freemantle, N., Seddon, J., et al. (2016). Measuring health and broader well-being benefits in the context of opiate dependence: The psychometric performance of the ICECAP-A and the EQ-5D-5L. Value in Health, 19(6), 820–828. PubMed

21.

Keeley, T., Coast, J., Nicholls, E., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S., & Al-Janabi, H. (2016). An analysis of the complementarity of ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-3L in an adult population of patients with knee pain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 36. PubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Mitchell, P. M., Roberts, T. E., Barton, P. M., & Coast, J. (2015). Assessing sufficient capability: A new approach to economic evaluation. Social Science and Medicine, 139, 71–79. PubMed

23.

Goranitis, I., Coast, J., Day, E., Copello, A., Freemantle, N., & Frew, E. (2017). Maximizing health or sufficient capability in economic evaluation? A methodological experiment of treatment for drug addiction. Medical Decision Making, 37(5), 498–511. PubMed

24.

Coast, J. (2014). Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: Making a case for the capability approach. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 14(4), 473–482.

25.

NICE (2014). Developing NICE guidelines—The manual. Retrieved April 2, 2019, from https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/developing-nice-guidelines-the-manual.pdf.

26.

Steel, C., van der Gaag, M., Korrelboom, K., Simon, J., Phiri, P., Baksh, M. F., et al. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of positive memory training for the treatment of depression within schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 15(1), 85. PubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Kingslake, J., Dias, R., Dawson, G. R., Simon, J., Goodwin, G. M., Harmer, C. J., et al. (2017). The effects of using the PReDicT Test to guide the antidepressant treatment of depressed patients: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 18(1), 558. PubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Burns, T., Rugkasa, J., Yeeles, K., & Catty, J. (2016). Coercion in mental health: A trial of the effectiveness of community treatment orders and an investigation of informal coercion in community mental health care. Programme Grants for Applied Research, 4(21).

29.

Simon, J., Łaszewska, A., Leutner, E., Spiel, G., Churchman, D., & Mayer, S. (2018). Cultural and linguistic transferability of the multi-dimensional OxCAP-MH capability instrument for outcome measurement in mental health: The German language version. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 173. PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Vergunst, F., Jenkinson, C., Burns, T., & Simon, J. (2014). Application of Sen’s capability approach to outcome measurement in mental health research: Psychometric validation of a novel multi-dimensional instrument (OxCAP-MH). Human Welfare, 3(1).

31.

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich. (2018). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2018. Retrieved April 2, 2019, from http://wko.at/statistik/jahrbuch/2018_Deutsch.pdf.

32.

Statistik Austria. (2018). Regionale Gesamtrechnungen 2016. Retrieved April 2, 2019 https://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/wirtschaft/volkswirtschaftliche_gesamtrechnungen/index.html.

33.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). DC: American Psychiatric Associaton Washington.

34.

Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310. PubMed

35.

Meijer, R. R., de Vries, R. M., & van Bruggen, V. (2011). An evaluation of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 using item response theory: Which items are most strongly related to psychological distress? Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 193–202. PubMed

36.

Franke, G. H., Jaeger, S., Glaesmer, H., Barkmann, C., Petrowski, K., & Braehler, E. (2017). Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, 14. PubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Moos, R. H., Nichol, A. C., & Moos, B. S. (2002). Global assessment of functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 53(6), 730–737. PubMed

38.

Hall, R. C. (1995). Global assessment of functioning: A modified scale. Psychosomatics, 36(3), 267–275. PubMed

39.

Soderberg, P., Tungstrom, S., & Armelius, B. A. (2005). Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff. Psychiatric Services, 56(4), 434–438. PubMed

40.

Hilsenroth, M. J., Ackerman, S. J., Blagys, M. D., Baumann, B. D., Baity, M. R., Smith, S. R., et al. (2000). Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(11), 1858–1863. PubMed

41.

Molodynski, A., Linden, M., Juckel, G., Yeeles, K., Anderson, C., Vazquez-Montes, M., et al. (2013). The reliability, validity, and applicability of an English language version of the Mini-ICF-APP. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(8), 1347–1354. PubMed

42.

Linden, M., & Baron, S. (2005). [The “Mini-ICF-Rating for Mental Disorders (Mini-ICF-P)”. A short instrument for the assessment of disabilities in mental disorders]. Rehabilitation, 44(3), 144–151. PubMed

43.

EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.

44.

Buchholz, I., Thielker, K., Feng, Y. S., Kupatz, P., & Kohlmann, T. (2015). Measuring changes in health over time using the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: A head-to-head comparison of measurement properties and sensitivity to change in a German inpatient rehabilitation sample. Quality of Life Research, 24(4), 829–835. PubMed

45.

Bilbao, A., García-Perez, L., Retolaza-Balsategui, A., Mendezona-Peña, J., Estebanez, S., Vazquez de la Torre-Escalera, P., et al. (2017). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with major depression disorder. Value in Health, 20(9), A758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.2141. CrossRef

46.

Ludwig, K., Graf von der Schulenburg, J. M., & Greiner, W. (2018). German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. Pharmacoeconomics, 36(6), 663–674. PubMedPubMedCentral

47.

van Reenen, M., & Janssen, B. (2015). EQ-5D-5L user guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation.

48.

Rencz, F., Gulacsi, L., Drummond, M., Golicki, D., Prevolnik Rupel, V., Simon, J., et al. (2016). EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000-2015. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2693–2710. PubMed

49.

NICE. (2018). Position statement on use of the EQ-5D-5L valuation set for England (updated November 2018). Retrieved April 2, 2019, from https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l.

50.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. PubMed

51.

Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Timmerman, M. E., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ceulemans, E. (2018). The number of factors problem. In P. Irwing, T. Booth, & D. J. Hughes (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing. New York: Wiley.

53.

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3).

54.

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. PubMed

55.

Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Why rotate my data using Promin? Technical Report. In U. R. I. V. Department of Psychology, Tarragona (Ed.).

56.

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88–91. PubMed

57.

StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.

58.

Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434.

59.

Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109. PubMed

60.

Payakachat, N., Ali, M. M., & Tilford, J. M. (2015). Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics, 33(11), 1137–1154. PubMedPubMedCentral

61.

WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.

62.

Beckerman, H., Roebroeck, M., Lankhorst, G., Becher, J., Bezemer, P. D., & Verbeek, A. (2001). Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Quality of Life Research, 10(7), 571–578. PubMed

63.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. PubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

65.

Davis, J. C., Liu-Ambrose, T., Richardson, C. G., & Bryan, S. (2013). A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: Are they complements or substitutes? Quality of Life Research, 22(5), 969–977. PubMed

66.

Goranitis, I., Coast, J., Al-Janabi, H., Latthe, P., & Roberts, T. E. (2016). The validity and responsiveness of the ICECAP-A capability-well-being measure in women with irritative lower urinary tract symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 25, 2063–2075. PubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Keeley, T., Al-Janabi, H., Nicholls, E., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S., & Coast, J. (2015). A longitudinal assessment of the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A in a randomised controlled trial of a knee pain intervention. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2319–2331. PubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Mitchell, P. M., Al-Janabi, H., Byford, S., Kuyken, W., Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., et al. (2017). Assessing the validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure for adults with depression. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 46. PubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Rand, S., Malley, J., Towers, A.-M., Netten, A., & Forder, J. (2017). Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 163. PubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Baumgardt, J., Daum, M., von dem Knesebeck, O., Speck, A., & Röh, D. (2018). Assess capabilities among chronically mentally ill people: First test results on a draft German version of the OxCAP-MH as part of the BAESCAP study. Psychiatrische Praxis, 45(3), 140–147. PubMed

71.

Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., Peters, T. J., Bryan, S., & Coast, J. (2015). Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population. Health Economics, 24(5), 625–630. PubMed

Titel: Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
Auteurs:: Agata Łaszewska
Markus Schwab
Eva Leutner
Marold Oberrauter
Georg Spiel
Judit Simon
Publicatiedatum: 27-04-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Tijdschrift: Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Uitgave 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher's Note

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher's Note

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2019

Comparison of three generic quality-of-life metrics in peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing conservative and invasive treatments

Factors associated with low health-related quality of life among younger and older Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

The impact of progressive chronic kidney disease on health-related quality-of-life: a 12-year community cohort study

Development of a quality of life questionnaire for nursing home residents in mainland China

Correction to: Eculizumab improves fatigue in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

The role of religious coping and social support on medication adherence and quality of life among the elderly with type 2 diabetes