Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2017

21-07-2017

Measuring Attentional Control Ability or Beliefs? Evaluation of the Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Attentional Control Scale

Auteurs: Leanne Quigley, Caitlin A. Wright, Keith S. Dobson, Christopher R. Sears

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The Attentional Control Scale (ACS; Derryberry and Reed 2002) has been widely used to measure individual differences in attentional control capacity, yet limited data exists on the factor structure and psychometric properties of the scale. Using confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 125 undergraduate students, the present study evaluated and compared two different factor structures for the ACS reported in the literature. The convergent validity of the ACS was also explored by testing its associations with a behavioural measure of attentional control (the antisaccade task) and measures of working memory capacity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a correlated two-factor model reflecting “focusing” and “shifting” subscales that eliminated several underperforming items from each subscale. Contrary to predictions, there were no statistically significant correlations between the ACS and its subscales and the working memory and antisaccade task indices. In addition, it was found that the ACS and its subscales were negatively related to symptoms of anxiety and depression, whereas performance on the working memory and antisaccade tasks was unrelated to anxiety or depression. These findings suggest that the ACS may be a better measure of beliefs about attentional control capacity than ability per se, a possibility that requires further investigation.
Literatuur
go back to reference Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Beck anxiety Inventory manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Beck anxiety Inventory manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for Beck depression Inventory–II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for Beck depression Inventory–II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
go back to reference Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81.CrossRefPubMed Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chambless, D. L., & Gillis, M. M. (1993). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 248.CrossRefPubMed Chambless, D. L., & Gillis, M. M. (1993). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 248.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. doi:10.3758/BF03196772.CrossRef Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. doi:10.​3758/​BF03196772.CrossRef
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.​3758/​BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hermans, D., Martens, K., De Cort, K., Pieters, G., & Eelen, P. (2003). Reality monitoring and metacognitive beliefs related to cognitive confidence in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 383–401. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00015-3.CrossRefPubMed Hermans, D., Martens, K., De Cort, K., Pieters, G., & Eelen, P. (2003). Reality monitoring and metacognitive beliefs related to cognitive confidence in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 383–401. doi:10.​1016/​S0005-7967(02)00015-3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In A. Gruszka, G. Mathews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.CrossRef Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In A. Gruszka, G. Mathews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: The Psychology Foundation of Australia. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: The Psychology Foundation of Australia.
go back to reference Muris, P., van der Pennen, E., Sigmond, R., & Mayer, B. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and aggression in non-clinical children: Relationships with self-report and performance-based measures of attention and effortful control. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39, 455–467. doi:10.1007/s10578-008-0101-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muris, P., van der Pennen, E., Sigmond, R., & Mayer, B. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and aggression in non-clinical children: Relationships with self-report and performance-based measures of attention and effortful control. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39, 455–467. doi:10.​1007/​s10578-008-0101-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
go back to reference Ólafsson, R. P., Smári, J., Guðmundsdóttir, F., Ólafsdóttir, G., Harđardóttir, H. L., & Einarsson, S. M. (2011). Self-reported attentional control with the attentional control scale: Factor structure and relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 777–782. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.013.CrossRefPubMed Ólafsson, R. P., Smári, J., Guðmundsdóttir, F., Ólafsdóttir, G., Harđardóttir, H. L., & Einarsson, S. M. (2011). Self-reported attentional control with the attentional control scale: Factor structure and relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 777–782. doi:10.​1016/​j.​janxdis.​2011.​03.​013.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press. Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.
go back to reference Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 631–650. doi:10.1080/14640749408401131.CrossRef Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 631–650. doi:10.​1080/​1464074940840113​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Verstraeten, K., Vasey, M. W., Claes, L., & Bijttebier, P. (2010). The assessment of effortful control in childhood: Questionnaires and the test of everyday attention for children compared. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.016.CrossRef Verstraeten, K., Vasey, M. W., Claes, L., & Bijttebier, P. (2010). The assessment of effortful control in childhood: Questionnaires and the test of everyday attention for children compared. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 59–65. doi:10.​1016/​j.​paid.​2009.​08.​016.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, C. A., Dobson, K. S., & Sears, C. R. (2014). Does a high working memory capacity attenuate the negative impact of trait anxiety on attentional control? Evidence from the antisaccade task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 400–412. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.901331.CrossRef Wright, C. A., Dobson, K. S., & Sears, C. R. (2014). Does a high working memory capacity attenuate the negative impact of trait anxiety on attentional control? Evidence from the antisaccade task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 400–412. doi:10.​1080/​20445911.​2014.​901331.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measuring Attentional Control Ability or Beliefs? Evaluation of the Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Attentional Control Scale
Auteurs
Leanne Quigley
Caitlin A. Wright
Keith S. Dobson
Christopher R. Sears
Publicatiedatum
21-07-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9617-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2017

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2017 Naar de uitgave