Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The DASH was jointly developed by the Institute for Work & Health (IWH) and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). Copyright of the DASH/QuickDASH Outcome Measure was transferred in 2005 from joint copyright between IWH and AAOS to one of sole copyright to IWH. Two authors of this paper (DEB, SHJ) were part of the DASH development group.
To identify and synthesize evidence for the measurement properties of the QuickDASH, a shortened version of the 30-item DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) instrument.
This systematic review used a best evidence synthesis approach to critically appraise the measurement properties [using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)] of the QuickDASH and cross-cultural adaptations. A standard search strategy was conducted between 2005 (year of first publication of QuickDASH) and March 2011 in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.
The search identified 14 studies to include in the best evidence synthesis of the QuickDASH. A further 11 studies were identified on eight cross-cultural adaptation versions.
Many measurement properties of the QuickDASH have been evaluated in multiple studies and across most of the measurement properties. The best evidence synthesis of the QuickDASH English version suggests that this tool is performing well with strong positive evidence for reliability and validity (hypothesis testing), and moderate positive evidence for structural validity testing. Strong negative evidence was found for responsiveness due to lower correlations with global estimates of change. Information about the measurement properties of the cross-cultural adaptation versions is still lacking, or the available information is of poor overall methodological quality.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Beaton, D. E., Wright, J. G., & Katz, J. N. (2005). Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 87A(5), 1038–1046. CrossRef
Spearman, C. C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.
Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.
Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual. (Third) ed. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health. 2011.
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research [ePub ahead of print]. 2011
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. PubMedCrossRef
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 82. PubMedCrossRef
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. PubMedCrossRef
van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(12):1290-9.
Mehta S, MacDermid JC, Carlesso LC, McPhee C. Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(24):2150-6.
Niekel, M. C., Lindenhovius, A. L., Watson, J. B., Vranceanu, A. M., & Ring, D. (2009). Correlation of DASH and QuickDASH with measures of psychological distress. Journal of Hand Surgery (American)., 34(8), 1499–1505. CrossRef
Whalley, K., & Adams, J. (2009). The longitudinal validity of the quick and full version of the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in musculoskeletal hand outpatients. Hand Therapy., 14(1), 22–25. CrossRef
Fayad, F., Lefevre-Colau, M. M., Gautheron, V., Mace, Y., Fermanian, J., Mayoux-Benhamou, A., et al. (2009). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Manual Therapy., 14(2), 206–212. PubMedCrossRef
Angst, F., Goldhahn, J., Drerup, S., Flury, M., Schwyzer, H. K., & Simmen, B. R. (2009). How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1043–1051. PubMedCrossRef
Varju, C., Balint, Z., Solyom, A. I., Farkas, H., Karpati, E., Berta, B., et al. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire into Hungarian and investigation of its validity in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 26(5), 776–783. PubMed
Imaeda, T., Toh, S., Wada, T., Uchiyama, S., Okinaga, S., Kusunose, K., et al. (2006). Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 11(3), 248–253. PubMedCrossRef
Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 7:44, 2006. 2006;44.
Atroshi, I., Lyren, P. E., & Gummesson, C. (2009). The 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. Quality Life Research, 18(3), 347–358. CrossRef
Atroshi, I., Lyren, P. E., Ornstein, E., & Gummesson, C. (2011). The Six-Item CTS Symptoms Scale and Palmar Pain Scale in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (American), 36(5), 788–794. CrossRef
Nunnally JC. Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory..New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1978. p. 225-55.
de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Cambridge, UK: University Press. CrossRef
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91.
MacDermid JC. Critical appraisal of study quality for psychometric articles, evaluation form. In: Law M, MacDermid JC (Eds). Evidence- Based Rehabilitation (pp.387-388).Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 2008.
MacDermid JC. Critical appraisal of study quality for psychometric articles, interpretation guide. In: Law M, MacDermid JC (Eds). Evidence- Based Rehabilitation (pp.389-392).Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 2008.
McDowell, I., & Jenkinson, C. (1996). Development standards for health measures. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 1(4), 238–246.
Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(9):934-43.
Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. 2011
Abma, F. I., van der Klink, J. J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). Amick Iii BC, Bultmann U. Evaluation of the measurement properties of self-reported health-related work-functioning instruments among workers with common mental disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and. Health, 38(1), 5–18.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, UK: University Press.
- Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review
Carol A. Kennedy
Dorcas E. Beaton
Dwayne Van Eerd
- Springer Netherlands