Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

02-02-2018 | Review | Uitgave 6/2018 Open Access

Quality of Life Research 6/2018

Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 6/2018
Auteurs:
Susan E. M. van Dijk, Marcel C. Adriaanse, Lennart van der Zwaan, Judith E. Bosmans, Harm W. J. van Marwijk, Maurits W. van Tulder, Caroline B. Terwee
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-018-1782-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original articles, published in any language up to October 2016 were included. Eligibility for inclusion was independently assessed by three reviewers who worked in pairs. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of the questionnaires was rated per measurement property, based on the number and quality of the included studies and the reported results.

Results

Of 6286 unique hits, 21 studies met our criteria evaluating nine different questionnaires in multiple settings and languages. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable for the different measurement properties: 9/15 studies scored ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ on internal consistency, 2/5 on reliability, 0/1 on content validity, 10/10 on structural validity, 8/11 on hypothesis testing, 1/5 on cross-cultural validity, and 4/9 on criterion validity. For the CES-D, there was strong evidence for good internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity; moderate evidence for good criterion validity; and limited evidence for good cross-cultural validity. The PHQ-9 and WHO-5 also performed well on several measurement properties. However, the evidence for structural validity of the PHQ-9 was inconclusive. The WHO-5 was less extensively researched and originally not developed to measure depression.

Conclusion

Currently, the CES-D is best supported for measuring depressive symptoms in diabetes patients.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

Quality of Life Research 6/2018 Naar de uitgave