Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2019

27-11-2018

Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level

Auteurs: Irene Checa, Jaime Perales, Begoña Espejo

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Introduction

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) has shown strong evidence of acceptability, reliability, validity and invariance for gender, whereas there is mixed evidence of invariance by culture and age and the literature has not explored the roles of marital status and educational level. The SWLS should be invariant by marital status and educational level to be able to compare scores between groups. We aimed to explore the invariance of the SWLS by marital status and educational level.

Method

A convenience sample of 726 Spanish adults participated in a survey. We tested a one-factor model using confirmatory factor analysis. We tested the configural, metric and scalar invariance of the factorial structure of the SWLS by gender, age, marital status and level of education.

Results

The results show a scalar invariance by gender and educational level and a partial scalar invariance by marital status. Women and individuals in a relationship show greater subjective well-being while no differences are observed among people with different educational levels.

Discussion

The SLWS is valid for comparisons between genders, age, educational levels but not for marital status. It is essential to verify its invariance to interpret mean differences and significance values appropriately.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cummins, R. A. (2013). Measuring happiness and subjective well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 185–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cummins, R. A. (2013). Measuring happiness and subjective well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 185–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
30.
go back to reference Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in SEM. In R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modelling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in SEM. In R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modelling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level
Auteurs
Irene Checa
Jaime Perales
Begoña Espejo
Publicatiedatum
27-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2066-2