Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2011

01-05-2011

Measurement invariance of the 16-item social distress scale

Auteurs: Adam B. Smith, Penny Wright, Peter Selby, Galina Velikova

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The SD-16 is a 16-item instrument assessing social distress in cancer patients. In addition to work underlining the scale’s reliability, validity and clinical utility, recent research has also determined minimally important differences (MID) for the instrument. The aim of this study was to assess whether item locations remained stable over time, in order to support the longitudinal use of the instrument.

Methods

Data were collated from cancer patients (N = 123) who had completed the SD-16 at four time points (baseline, 6 months, 1 and 2 years). The Partial Credit Model (Rasch analysis) was applied to the data and item fit evaluated against published criteria. Measurement invariance of item location and person measures over time was assessed using analysis of variance.

Results

Good item fit was found with the exception of one item (“work”), which demonstrated misfit at two time points. No statistically significant differences were found for item locations. As anticipated, there were changes over time in patients’ scores, particularly in the first 6 months.

Conclusions

The instrument can be used longitudinally to accurately assess changes in cancer patients’ social distress.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Wright, E. P., Kiely, M., Johnston, C., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2005). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Quality of Life Research, 14, 373–386. PubMedCrossRef Wright, E. P., Kiely, M., Johnston, C., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2005). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Quality of Life Research, 14, 373–386. PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2004). Guidance on cancer services: Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. London, UK: NICE. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2004). Guidance on cancer services: Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. London, UK: NICE.
3.
go back to reference Wright, P., Smith, A., Roberts, K., Selby, P., & Velikova, G. (2007). Screening for social difficulties in cancer patients: Clinical utility of the Social Difficulties Inventory. British Journal of Cancer, 97, 1063–1070. PubMedCrossRef Wright, P., Smith, A., Roberts, K., Selby, P., & Velikova, G. (2007). Screening for social difficulties in cancer patients: Clinical utility of the Social Difficulties Inventory. British Journal of Cancer, 97, 1063–1070. PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wright, E. P., Kiely, M. A., Lynch, P., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Social problems in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 87(10), 1099–1104. PubMedCrossRef Wright, E. P., Kiely, M. A., Lynch, P., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Social problems in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 87(10), 1099–1104. PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith, A. B., Wright, P., Selby, P., & Velikova, G. (2007). Measuring social difficulties in routine patient-centred assessment: A Rasch analysis of the social difficulties inventory. Quality of Life Research, 16, 823–831. PubMedCrossRef Smith, A. B., Wright, P., Selby, P., & Velikova, G. (2007). Measuring social difficulties in routine patient-centred assessment: A Rasch analysis of the social difficulties inventory. Quality of Life Research, 16, 823–831. PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support, NHS Improvement. (2010). The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Vision. London 2010. Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support, NHS Improvement. (2010). The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Vision. London 2010.
7.
go back to reference Wright, P., Marshall, L., Smith, A. B., Velikova, G., & Selby, P. (2008). Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI-21). European Journal of Cancer, 44(11), 1529–1535. PubMedCrossRef Wright, P., Marshall, L., Smith, A. B., Velikova, G., & Selby, P. (2008). Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI-21). European Journal of Cancer, 44(11), 1529–1535. PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz, J. N., Johannesson, M., & Liang, M. H. (1996). Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: The whole may not equal the sum of the parts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 711–717. PubMedCrossRef Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz, J. N., Johannesson, M., & Liang, M. H. (1996). Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: The whole may not equal the sum of the parts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 711–717. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
go back to reference Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 29(8), 33. CrossRef Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 29(8), 33. CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Linacre, J. M. (2005). A User’s Guide to Winsteps/Ministeps Rasch- Model Programs. MESA Press: Chicago, IL. Linacre, J. M. (2005). A User’s Guide to Winsteps/Ministeps Rasch- Model Programs. MESA Press: Chicago, IL.
12.
go back to reference Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174. CrossRef Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174. CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wright, B. D., & Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 23–48. CrossRef Wright, B. D., & Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 23–48. CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., Gould, A., Forman, D., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998–1007. PubMed Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., Gould, A., Forman, D., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998–1007. PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement invariance of the 16-item social distress scale
Auteurs
Adam B. Smith
Penny Wright
Peter Selby
Galina Velikova
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9782-6