Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

14-03-2022

Measurement invariance of physical, mental, and social health PROMIS measures across individuals with spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury

Auteurs: Sarah D. Patrick, Gavin Sanders, Aaron J. Boulton, David S. Tulsky

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2022

Abstract

Purpose

The present study tested the fit and comparability of the tripartite model of health (Physical Health, Mental Health, and Social Health) proposed by the NIH PROMIS for adults with SCI and TBI.

Methods

Participants were 630 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI; n = 336) and traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 294) who completed 8 PROMIS short forms. The Physical Health domain is composed of the Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Fatigue scales. The Mental Health domain included the Depression, Anxiety, and Anger scales. Social Health included the Social Emotional Support scale.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses supported the tripartite model of health over a unifactorial model of health for both SCI and TBI groups. Measurement invariance testing indicated the tripartite model met the level of configural and metric invariance for TBI and SCI groups, suggesting comparable structure and factor loadings. Failure to meet the level of scalar invariance indicated unequal intercepts across groups. Physical Function was identified as the source of noninvariance, and a partial scalar invariance model permitting different Physical Function intercepts across conditions was supported.

Conclusion

Consistent with theory, findings supported construct validity of the PROMIS tripartite structure of health composed of Physical, Mental, and Social Health. PROMIS measures appeared to tap domains of health consistent with what is accepted for SCI and TBI populations, although the measurement of Physical Function was not equivalent across groups. Findings support the utility of PROMIS broadly as well as the need for condition-optimized measurement.

vorige artikel Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures

volgende artikel The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity

Greenfield, S., & Nelson, E. C. (1992). Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS23–MS41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199205001-00003CrossRefPubMed

Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Johnson, K. L., & Cella, D. (2011). The PROMIS initiative: Involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S12–S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Choi, S. W., Condon, D. M., Schalet, B., Hays, R. D., Rothrock, N. E., Yount, S., Cook, K. F., Gershon, R. C., Amtmann, D., DeWalt, D. A., Pilkonis, P. A., Stone, A. A., Weinfurt, K., & Reeve, B. B. (2019). PROMIS® adult health profiles: Efficient short-form measures of seven health domains. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22(5), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004CrossRef

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., Devellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J. F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J. S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., Rose, M., PROMIS Cooperative. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Victorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., & Moy, C. (2011). The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Supplement), S28–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Victorson, D., Choi, S. W., Gershon, R., Heinemann, A. W., & Cella, D. (2015). Methodology for the development and calibration of the SCI-QOL item banks. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Victorson, D., Carlozzi, N., Bushnik, T., Sherer, M., Choi, S. W., Heinemann, A. W., Chiaravalloti, N., Sander, A. M., Englander, J., Hanks, R., Kolakowsky-Hayner, S., Roth, E., Gershon, R., Rosenthal, M., & Cella, D. (2016). TBI-QOL: development and calibration of item banks to measure patient reported outcomes following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 31(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000131CrossRefPubMed

Kisala, P. A., Boulton, A. J., Cohen, M. L., Slavin, M. D., Jette, A. M., Charlifue, S., Hanks, R., Mulcahey, M. J., Cella, D., & Tulsky, D. S. (2019). Interviewer- versus self-administration of PROMIS® measures for adults with traumatic injury. Health psychology: Official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 38(5), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000685CrossRef

10.

Lukersmith, S. (2013). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury.

11.

NIH National Institute on Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2019). Traumatic Brain Injury Information. Retrieved from https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Information-Page#disorders-r2

12.

Carle, A. C., Riley, W., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) adult domain framework using item response theory scores. Medical care, 53(10), 894.CrossRef

13.

Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S1–S2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076.74CrossRef

14.

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2018). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.): Pearson.

15.

Team, R. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R 1.2.5033. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/

16.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.CrossRef

17.

PROMIS Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation Scientific Standards, Version 2.0.; 2013. Retrieved from http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers2.0_Final.pdf.

18.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

19.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588CrossRef

20.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005CrossRef

21.

Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2014). Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 460–470.CrossRef

22.

Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Savalei, V., & Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 904–930.CrossRef

23.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192CrossRef

24.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5CrossRef

25.

Greene, R. L., & Weiner, I. B. (2017). Self-report inventories: Overview. In Handbook of Personality Assessment (pp. 77–104). New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

26.

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236CrossRef

27.

Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2016). Comparisons of three empirical methods for partial factorial invariance: Forward, backward, and factor-ratio tests. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1138092CrossRef

28.

Cho, S. J., Suh, Y., & Lee, W. Y. (2016). After differential item functioning is detected: IRT item calibration and scoring in the presence of DIF. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 573–591.CrossRef

29.

Tulsky, D. S., Jette, A. M., Kisala, P. A., Kalpakjian, C., Dijkers, M. P., Whiteneck, G., Ni, P., Kirshblum, S., Charlifue, S., Heinemann, A. W., Forchheimer, M., Slavin, M. D., Houlihan, B., Tate, D. G., Dyson-Hudson, T., Fyffe, D. G., Williams, S., & Zanca, J. (2012). Spinal cord injury-functional index: Item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), 1722–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Measurement invariance of physical, mental, and social health PROMIS measures across individuals with spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury
Auteurs: Sarah D. Patrick
Gavin Sanders
Aaron J. Boulton
David S. Tulsky
Publicatiedatum: 14-03-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03114-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2022

New complementary perspectives for inpatient physical function assessment: matched clinician-report and patient-report short form measures from the PROMIS adult physical function item bank

The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review

The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity

Japanese preference weights of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer)

Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies

Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health