Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

15-04-2021

Measurement Equivalence across Multiple Administrations of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument

Auteurs: Jeremiah W. Jaggers, Christopher Cambron, Patricia K. Kerig, Philip J. Osteen

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2nd Version (MAYSI-2) has strong validity and reliability. Justice involved youth are often administered the MAYSI-2 on repeated occasions. The purpose of the current study was to test the equivalence of measurement properties over time for males who were administered the MAYSI-2 on multiple occasions. Archived data were drawn from the Utah Juvenile Justice Services administration, which consisted of all administrations of the MAYSI-2 between 2007 to 2018. Among these, 909 males completed the MAYSI-2 three or more times. Single and multiple group longitudinal invariance tests were conducted using a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimation in order to determine measurement equivalence across multiple administrations. Increasingly restrictive constraints for configural, metric, and scalar invariance models across Time 1 and Time 3 as well as models constraining latent means and variances to be equal across Time 1 and Time 3 all fit these data well. The established seven factor structure for the MAYSI-2 fit the data as well. However, some differences were noted in item level functioning across multiple administrations. The results of the current study suggest that multiple administrations of the MAYSI-2 may not exhibit equivalent measurement properties over time. Consistency of the measurement properties of the MAYSI-2 over time is essential for evaluating changes in mental health. Given that contact with the juvenile justice system has the potential to worsen symptoms of mental illness, caution is warranted when using the MAYSI-2 to assess change.

vorige artikel Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Psychopathic Traits in Adolescents: Empathy-Related Responses to Witnessing Animal Distress

volgende artikel More Likely to Have Risky Sex but less Sexually Satisfied: a Profile of High Social Interaction Anxiety, Urgency, and Emotion Dysregulation

Aalsma, M. C., Gudonis, L. C., Jarjoura, G. R., Blythe, M. J., Tong, Y., Harezlak, J., & Rosenman, M. B. (2012). The consequences of juvenile detention reform for mental health and sexually transmitted infection screening among detained youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.013.CrossRef

Archer, R. P., Simonds-Bisbee, E. C., Spiegel, D. R., Handel, R. W., & Elkins, D. E. (2010). Validity of the Massachusetts youth screening instrument–2 (MAYSI–2) scales in juvenile justice settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.482009.CrossRefPubMed

Archer, R. P., Stredny, R. V., Mason, J. A., & Arnau, R. C. (2004). An examination and replication of the psychometric properties of the Massachusetts youth instrument-second edition (MAYSI-2) among adolescents in detention settings. Assessment, 11, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104269863.CrossRefPubMed

Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., Muthén, B. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Matrix 1: 1-6. 10.1.1.309.8435.

Brawn, K. M., & Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2008). Female juvenile prostitutes: Exploring the relationship to substance use. Child Youth Svcs Rvw, 30, 1395–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.04.011.CrossRef

Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guildford Press.

Cauffman, E., & MacIntosh, R. (2006). A Rasch differential item functioning analyses of the Massachusetts youth screening instrument: Identifying race and gender differential item functioning among juvenile offenders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282460.CrossRef

Chapman, J., & Ford, J. (2008). Relationships between suicide risk, traumatic experiences, and substance use among juvenile detainees. Archives of Suicide Research, 12, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811110701800830.CrossRefPubMed

Coker, K. L., Wernsman, J., Ikpe, U. N., Brooks, J. S., Bushell, L. L., & Kahn, B. A. (2013). Using the Massachusetts youth screening instrument–version 2 on a community sample of African American and Latino/a juvenile offenders to identify mental health and substance abuse treatment needs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813505565.CrossRef

Colins, O. F., Grisso, T., Vahl, P., Guy, L., Mulder, E., Hornby, N., Pronk, C., Markus, M., Doreleijers, T., & Vermeiren, R. (2015). Standardized screening for mental health needs of detained youths from various ethnic origins: The Dutch Massachusetts youth screening instrument-second version (MAYSI-2). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9476-4.CrossRefPubMed

Development Services Group, Inc. (2017). “Juvenile reentry.” Literature review: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Aftercare.pdf

Garland, E. L., Pettus-Davis, C., & Howard, M. O. (2012). Self-medication among traumatized youth: Structural equation modeling of pathways between trauma history, substance misuse, and psychological distress. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9413-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grisso, T., & Barnum, R. (2001). The Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument: Second version (MAYSI-2). University of Massachusetts Medical School.

Grisso, T., & Barnum, R. (2006). Massachusetts youth screening instrument, version 2: MAYSI-2: User's manual and technical report: Professional resource press Sarasota.

Grisso, T., Fusco, S., Paiva-Salisbury, M., Perrauot, R., Williams, V., & Barnum, R. (2012). The Massachusetts youth screening instrument-version 2 (MAYSI-2): Comprehensive research review. University of Massachusetts Medical School.

Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288892.CrossRefPubMed

Jaggers, J. W., Young, S. R., McKinney, R., Bolland, K., & Church II, W. T. (2013). Utilization of the Massachusetts youth screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2) with a southern African American adolescent male population. J. Forensic Soc. Wk, 3, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2013.809326.CrossRef

Kathlene, L. (n.d.). MAYSI-2 administration and referral protocol template instructions. Retrieved from: https://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/oajja/Training/MAYSI/MAYSI2_Referral_Protocol_Template_InstructionsFinal2014.pdf

Kerig, P. K., Arnzen Moeddel, M., & Becker, S. P. (2011). Assessing the sensitivity and specificity of the MAYSI-2 for detecting trauma among youth in juvenile detention. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9124-4.CrossRef

Kerig, P. K., & Schindler, S. R. (2013). Engendering the evidence base: A critical review of the conceptual and empirical foundations of gender-responsive interventions for girls’ delinquency. Laws, 2(3), 244–282. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws2030244.CrossRef

Kerig, P. K., Ward, R. M., Vanderzee, K. L., & Moeddel, M. A. (2009). Posttraumatic stress as a mediator of the relationship between trauma and mental health problems among juvenile delinquents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1214–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9332-5.CrossRefPubMed

Leenarts, L., Dölitzsch, C., Schmeck, K., Fegert, J. M., Grisso, T., & Schmid, M. (2016). Relationship between Massachusetts youth screening instrument-second version and psychiatric disorders in youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions in Switzerland. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 340. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1032-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J.-Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22, 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075.CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Mplus. The comprehensive modelling program for applied researchers: User’s guide, 5.

National Institute of Justice. (2016). Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Ochoa, Y.D. (2016) Examining the Spanish MAYSI-2 translation among Mexican Americans. ETD collection for University of Texas, El Paso. Paper AAI10118219. http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/dissertations/AAI10118219

Pendergast, L. L., von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. R. (2017). Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002.CrossRefPubMed

Russell, J. D., Marsee, M. A., & Ryals Jr., J. S. (2017). Identifying mental health issues in detained youth: Testing the structure and invariance of the Massachusetts youth screening inventory–version 2 (MAYSI-2). Psychological Assessment, 29, 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000410.CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (2012). Stability and change in girls’ delinquency and the gender gap: Trends in violence and alcohol offending across multiple sources of evidence. In S. Miller, L. D. Leve, & P. K. Kerig (Eds.), Delinquent girls: Context, relationships, and adaptation (pp. 3–23). New York: Springer.

Thissen, D. (2000). Reliability and measurement precision. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (p. 159–184). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Org. Research Meth, 5, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002001.CrossRef

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

Titel: Measurement Equivalence across Multiple Administrations of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument
Auteurs: Jeremiah W. Jaggers
Christopher Cambron
Patricia K. Kerig
Philip J. Osteen
Publicatiedatum: 15-04-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09887-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

The Role of Emotional Regulation in Anxiety and Depression Symptom Interplay and Expression among Adolescent Females

Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of a Persian Version of the Children’s Florida Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (C-FOCI)

Development of the COVID-19 Perinatal Perception Questionnaire (COVID19-PPQ)

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Addiction-Engagement Questionnaire Using a Longitudinal Sample

An Ecological Momentary Assessment Examination of the Transdiagnostic Model of Food and Alcohol Disturbance

Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Psychopathic Traits in Adolescents: Empathy-Related Responses to Witnessing Animal Distress