Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Quality of life mapping methods such as “Transfer to Utility” can be used to translate scores on disease-specific measures to utility values, when traditional utility measurement methods (e.g. standard gamble, time trade-off, preference-based multi-attribute instruments) have not been used. The aim of this study was to generate preliminary ordinary least squares (OLS) regression-based algorithms to transform scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ), a widely used measure of mental health in children and adolescents, to utility values obtained using the preference-based Child Health Utility (CHU9D) instrument.
Two hundred caregivers of children receiving community mental health services completed the SDQ and CHU9D during a telephone interview. Two OLS regressions were run with the CHU9D utility value as the dependent variable and SDQ subscales as predictors. Resulting algorithms were validated by comparing predicted and observed group mean utility values in randomly selected subsamples.
Preliminary validation was obtained for two algorithms, utilising five and three subscales of the SDQ, respectively. Root mean square error values (.124) for both models suggested poor fit at an individual level, but both algorithms performed well in predicting mean group observed utility values.
This research generated algorithms for translating SDQ scores to utility values and providing researchers with an additional tool for conducting health economic evaluations with child and adolescent mental health data.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Department of Health & Ageing. (2012). Guidelines for preparing submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Accessed January 10, 2013, from http://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-guidelines/PBAC4.3.2.pdf.
Romeo, R., Byford, S., & Knapp, M. (2005). Annotation: Economic evaluations of child and adolescent mental health interventions: a systematic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 46(9), 919–930. CrossRef
Kilian, R., Losert, C., Park, A.-L., McDaid, D., & Knapp, M. (2010). Cost-effectiveness analysis in child and adolescent mental health problems: An updated review of literature. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 12(4), 45–57. CrossRef
Dalziel, K., & Segal, L. (2009). Economic evaluation in child protection: What are the special challenges? In W. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 133–164). London: Oxford Press.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2008). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Segal, L., Day, S. E., Chapman, A. B., & Osborne, R. H. (2004). Can we reduce disease burden from osteoarthritis? The Medical Journal of Australia, 180(5 Suppl), S11–S17. PubMed
Goodman, R. (2007). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38(5), 581–586. CrossRef
Stevens, K. J. (2008). Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference based generic paediatric health related quality of life measure. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper 08/04. http://www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/discussion.html.
Ratcliffe, J., Flynn, T., Terlich, F., Brazier, J., Stevens, K., & Sawyer, M. (2012). Developing adolescent specific health state values for economic evaluation: An application of profile case best worst scaling to the Child Health Utility-9D. Pharmacoeconomics, 30, 713–727.
Canaway, A. G., & Frew, E. J. (2012). Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6–7 years: A comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y-the WAVES Pilot Study. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 173–183.
Ratcliffe, J., Couzner, L., Flynn, T., Sawyer, M., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., et al. (2011). Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: A feasibility study to compare best-worst discrete choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade off methods. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(1), 15–27. PubMedCrossRef
- Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values
- Springer International Publishing