Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 6/2020

21-09-2019 | Original Paper

Mapping French People’s Positions Regarding the Children’s Right to Know their Biological Parents’ Identity

Auteurs: Mathilde Nacher, Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre, Lonzozou Kpanake, Etienne Mullet

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 6/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

The study aimed at mapping in a detailed way French lay people’s positions on the disclosure of information that makes possible the tracing of their biological origins for adoptees and for donor conceived persons.

Method

A convenience sample of 151 adults was presented with a set of 20 vignettes that depicted the situation of teenagers (1) who recently learned that one or both of their parents were not their biological parents, (2) who wished to have information about biological parents, and (3) who were denied access to information because of legal dispositions in the country. Participants were asked to judge the extent to which the denial of access to information was defensible. The factors introduced in the vignettes were the teenagers’ age and motives (e.g., an 18-year old boy who was suffering from a genetic illness), and the filiation link (e.g., conceived through sperm donation).

Results

Through cluster analysis, four qualitatively different positions were found: Never Defensible (16% of participants), Not Very Defensible (42%), Depends on Circumstances (13%), and Almost Always Defensible (29%).

Conclusions

The difference in importance that participants in this study attributed to blood filiation – whether it was essential to know about it or not – is reminiscent of the more general opposition between two legal principles regarding the way nationality is conferred: jus sanguinis (right of blood, which applies in England or Germany) versus jus soli (right of soil, which applies in France).
Literatuur
go back to reference American Adoption Congress (1979). Resolution. Washington, DC: American Adoption Congress. American Adoption Congress (1979). Resolution. Washington, DC: American Adoption Congress.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (2019). Moral science. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Anderson, N. H. (2019). Moral science. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Cahn, N. (2014). Do tell! The rights of donor-conceived offspring. Hofstra Law Review, 42, 1077–1124. Cahn, N. (2014). Do tell! The rights of donor-conceived offspring. Hofstra Law Review, 42, 1077–1124.
go back to reference Child Welfare Information Gateway (2009). Postadoption contact agreements between birth and adoptive families: summary of state law. Washington, DC: Child Welfare Information Gateway. Child Welfare Information Gateway (2009). Postadoption contact agreements between birth and adoptive families: summary of state law. Washington, DC: Child Welfare Information Gateway.
go back to reference Committee of the Rights of the Child (2016). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of France. United Nations, New York, NY: Committee of the Rights of the Child, United Nations. Committee of the Rights of the Child (2016). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of France. United Nations, New York, NY: Committee of the Rights of the Child, United Nations.
go back to reference Freeman, T., Bourne, K., Jadva, V., & Smith, V. (2014). Making connections: contact between sperm donor relations. In T. Freeman, S. Graham, F. Ebtehaj & M. Richards (Eds.), Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities (pp. 270–295). Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Freeman, T., Bourne, K., Jadva, V., & Smith, V. (2014). Making connections: contact between sperm donor relations. In T. Freeman, S. Graham, F. Ebtehaj & M. Richards (Eds.), Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities (pp. 270–295). Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Glennon, T. (2016). Legal regulation of family creation through gamete donation: access, identity and parentage. In S. Golombok & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Regulating reproductive donation (pp. 60–83). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Glennon, T. (2016). Legal regulation of family creation through gamete donation: access, identity and parentage. In S. Golombok & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Regulating reproductive donation (pp. 60–83). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Grotevant, H. D., & von Korff, L. (2011). Adoptive identity. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 585–601). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef Grotevant, H. D., & von Korff, L. (2011). Adoptive identity. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 585–601). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
go back to reference Howe, D., & Feast, J. (2000). Adoption, search and reunion: the long term experience of adopted adults. London: The Children’s Society. Howe, D., & Feast, J. (2000). Adoption, search and reunion: the long term experience of adopted adults. London: The Children’s Society.
go back to reference Kramer, W., & Cahn, N. (2013). Finding our families: a first-of-its-kind book for donor-conceived people and their families. New York, NY: Penguin. Kramer, W., & Cahn, N. (2013). Finding our families: a first-of-its-kind book for donor-conceived people and their families. New York, NY: Penguin.
go back to reference Legislation Government United Kingdom (1976). Adoption act 1976. London, England: Legislation Government United Kingdom. Legislation Government United Kingdom (1976). Adoption act 1976. London, England: Legislation Government United Kingdom.
go back to reference Robinson, E. B. (2005). Adoption and loss: the hidden grief. London: Clova. Robinson, E. B. (2005). Adoption and loss: the hidden grief. London: Clova.
go back to reference Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017). Citizenship. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017). Citizenship. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
go back to reference UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Convention. United Nations, New York, NY: UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Convention. United Nations, New York, NY: UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Metagegevens
Titel
Mapping French People’s Positions Regarding the Children’s Right to Know their Biological Parents’ Identity
Auteurs
Mathilde Nacher
Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre
Lonzozou Kpanake
Etienne Mullet
Publicatiedatum
21-09-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01563-w