The decision whether or not an individual patient is eligible for treatment with [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT is dependent on clinical assessment and evaluation of imaging and laboratory findings and is made by a multidisciplinary tumor board. In general, mCRPC patients who 1) have failed or are ineligible for alternative cytotoxic treatment options and 2) have adequate organ function and 3) show adequate radiotracer uptake on PSMA PET/CT prior to therapy are considered eligible for [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT (Tab.
1). However, the definition of ‘adequate uptake’ is a topic for discussion. Current practice is based on previous literature on neuroendocrine theranostics, in which uptake in tumor sites must at least be higher than physiological uptake in normal organs, such as the liver.
Table 1
Current indications for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy
Life expectancy >6 months (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2) |
Histological, pathological, and/or cytological confirmation of PCa |
Prior orchiectomy and/or ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy and a castrate level of serum testosterone (<50 ng/dL or <1.7 nmol/L) |
≥1 previous NAAD (enzalutamide and/or abiraterone) and 1–2 previous taxane regimens, or incapability to undergo taxane regimens |
No previous RLT or hemi-body irradiation within 6 months prior to treatment commencement |
Progressive mCRPC (serum PSA progression, soft-tissue progression or progression of bone disease) |
Adequate organ function: – Serum creatinine <150 µmol/L or eGFR >30 ml/min./1.73 m2 – Liver enzymes <5 fold ULN – Hemoglobin ≥5.5 mmol/L – White blood cell count ≥3 × 109/L – Absolute neutrophil count >1.5 × 109/L – Platelet count ≥100 × 109/L |
Positive PSMA PET/CT (visual assessment; radiotracer uptake in tumor sites preferably significantly greater than uptake in normal liver parenchyma) |
No baseline superscan (skeletal scintigraphy) |
No symptomatic spinal cord compression, or clinical or radiologic findings indicative of impending cord compression |
Treatment protocol
To date, the optimal administered activity of [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT per cycle has still not been clarified. The currently administered activity [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ranges from 6.0–7.5 GBq per cycle, in 2–6 cycles, with an interval of 6–8 weeks. This variety is a result of the evidence generated by previous observational cohort studies, in which patients received a median radiotracer activity of 6.0 GBq (range: 3.7–9.3 GBq), and the recently published phase II study, in which a fixed activity of 7.5 GBq was administered [
25]. At present, only one dose-escalation study was performed so far, which reports on 40 patients who underwent treatment with 4.0 GBq, 6.0 GBq, 7.4 GBq or 9.3 GBq [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 [
26]. Despite the fact that occurrence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was limited and equally divided among the treatment activity groups, a large proportion of patients treated with 9.3 GBq did not complete the three planned cycles as a result of incomplete recovery of haematological toxicities. This may suggest that the maximum tolerated dose in this group was reached. Future comparative studies are required to define the optimal dosage.
To receive [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy, patients are admitted to the nuclear medicine ward for treatment and released from the hospital according to Dutch regulatory radiation guidelines (20 uSv/h measured at a distance of 1 m). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is administered by slow infusion (20 ml/min flow rate). To prevent nausea, antiemetic drugs are supplied. To monitor biochemical response and toxicity, laboratory tests (full blood count, kidney and liver function tests and PSA) are executed after every treatment cycle. Post-therapeutic scintigraphy following every therapy cycle is performed to investigate radiotracer uptake, which may serve to evaluate imaging response of PSMA positive lesions. After two, four and six cycles, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans are performed. Whether or not to continue therapy is discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting after every two cycles.
Safety and efficacy
Past years, four systematic reviews/meta-analyses on [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT were published, in which mainly small, predominantly German studies were included [
27‐
30]. All reviews reported on (one of the following) oncological outcomes including safety and tumor response, clinical parameters and survival effects. Significant variability between the published reviews exists, which is explained by the different publications selected. For example, Calopedos et al. and Von Eyben et al. also included publications reporting on [
177Lu]Lu-J591 therapy, known to be associated with higher toxicity rates compared to [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. Moreover, heterogeneity existed with regard to outcomes and follow-up schemes. Thus, we will only discuss the review of Yadav et al., that focused on small molecule treatments with [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T only.
The review by Yadav et al. included 16 publications [
30]. Thirteen studies reported on [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617; two on [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and one on both compounds. Overall pooled proportions of patients who had any PSA-decline and >50% PSA decline were respectively 75% (95% CI: 70–79%) and 46% (40–53%). Objective tumor response according to the RECIST criteria was reported by eight studies (
n = 175 patients). A proportion of 37.2% of patients had partial remission, 38.3% stable disease and 24.5% progressive disease. Molecular response on PET imaging (according to PERCIST criteria) was reported by eight of the 17 studies (
n = 167 patients). 74 patients (44.3%) had a partial molecular response, 39 patients (23.4%) had stable disease, and 54 patients (32.3%) had disease progression. Most side effects were mild (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade 1–2) and comprised anemia (23%), leukopenia (14.2%) and thrombocytopenia (15%). Renal toxicity was reported in 9.5% of patients. Most important non-hematological toxicity was confined to the salivary glands (i.e. xerostomia; 14.5%). These results support the safety and efficacy profile of [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy to treat advanced PCa.
In 2018, the first prospective study on [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy was published [
25]. In this phase II study, including 30 mCRPC patients, 1–4 cycles with 7.5 GBq (range: 4.4–8.7 GBq) [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were administered. Main aim of the study was the analysis of PSA response rate and toxicity. Additional primary endpoints included radiological response assessed by CT for soft tissue response only, skeletal scintigraphy, [
68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and [
18F]F-FDG PET/CT. Response on [
68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and [
18F]F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated using Hicks qualitative criteria. In this study, >50% PSA decline was observed in 57% of the patients. Most common toxicities included CTCAE grade 1 xerostomia (87%), grade 1–2 transient nausea (50%) and fatigue (50%). Biochemical toxicities included grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (13%), grade 3 anemia (13%) and neutropenia (7%). In 14 of the 17 patients (82%) with measurable disease at baseline, objective imaging response in lymph nodes and visceral lesions was observed. Treatment was even ceased in two patients after two of the four planned cycles, because of an exceptional response to treatment. After two treatment cycles, quality of life according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire improved with 10 points in 37% of the patients. PSA progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6.3–9.0 months). Median overall survival was 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.4–22.7) months. Twenty-two patients (73%) died during follow-up, most likely as a result of disease progression (
n = 21). Therapy-related deaths were not reported.
The only Dutch study, addressing efficacy and toxicity of [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy, was published in 2019 [
31]. Thirty mCRPC patients underwent [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 with a mean activity of 6.0 GBq (5.6–6.4 GBq) per cycle. Median number of therapy cycles was four (range: 1–6 cycles) with a planned interval of 6 weeks (range: 5.5–35 weeks). [
68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were repeated after two, four and six cycles for evaluation of tumor response. A multidisciplinary tumor board discussed whether or not to continue therapy after every two cycles. In case of partial remission or stable disease, further therapy cycles were planned. Treatment was ceased if disease progression was observed. In patients with exceptional response, further treatment cycles were temporarily postponed and restarted after evident biochemical progression. During treatment, PSA-decline of >50% and >90% was observed in respectively 57% and 24% of patients. Despite two patients (7%) who suffered from newly originated grade 3–4 anemia, [
177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy was generally well tolerated and toxicities were mild (CTCAE grade 1–2). Grade 2 xerostomia was observed in 17% of the patients. After the first cycle, usage of analgesics decreased in 45% of patients with pain symptoms at commencement of therapy. In 52% of patients, these symptoms ameliorated after two cycles. With regard to imaging response on [
68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT 52%, 47% and 75% of patients showed a partial response after respectively the second, fourth and sixth cycle, and progressive disease was seen in respectively 17%, 20% and 0% of the analyzed patients. Notably, the reported response rates may be influenced by patient selection, since patients suffering from progressive disease were excluded from further treatment cycles. During a median follow-up of 13.7 (range 9.8–32.3) months, median overall survival was 11.3 months (range 1.4–32.3 months). 10 patients died during follow-up, mostly due to progressive disease.