Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2021

18-08-2020

Longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: methods and interpretation of results

Auteurs: Caroline Bascoul-Mollevi, Antoine Barbieri, Céline Bourgier, Thierry Conroy, Bruno Chauffert, Mohamed Hebbar, William Jacot, Beata Juzyna, Hélène De Forges, Sophie Gourgou, Franck Bonnetain, Célia Touraine, Amélie Anota

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is assessed by self-administered questionnaires throughout the care process. Classically, two longitudinal statistical approaches were mainly used to study HRQoL: linear mixed models (LMM) or time-to-event models for time to deterioration/time until definitive deterioration (TTD/TUDD). Recently, an alternative strategy based on generalized linear mixed models for categorical data has also been proposed: the longitudinal partial credit model (LPCM). The objective of this article is to evaluate these methods and to propose recommendations to standardize longitudinal analysis of HRQoL data in cancer clinical trials.

Methods

The three methods are first described and compared through statistical, methodological, and practical arguments, then applied on real HRQoL data from clinical cancer trials or published prospective databases. In total, seven French studies from a collaborating group were selected with longitudinal collection of QLQ-C30. Longitudinal analyses were performed with the three approaches using SAS, Stata and R software.

Results

We observed concordant results between LMM and LPCM. However, discordant results were observed when we considered the TTD/TUDD approach compared to the two previous methods. According to methodological and practical arguments discussed, the approaches seem to provide additional information and complementary interpretations. LMM and LPCM are the most powerful methods on simulated data, while the TTD/TUDD approach gives more clinically understandable results. Finally, for single-item scales, LPCM is more appropriate.

Conclusion

These results pledge for the recommendation to use of both the LMM and TTD/TUDD longitudinal methods, except for single-item scales, establishing them as the consensual methods for publications reporting HRQoL.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Osoba, D. (2011). Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 3(2), 57–71.CrossRef Osoba, D. (2011). Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 3(2), 57–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. on behalf of the E. Q. of L. Group. (2001). EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition). Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. on behalf of the E. Q. of L. Group. (2001). EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition).
4.
go back to reference Bonnetain, F., Fiteni, F., Efficace, F., & Anota, A. (2016). Statistical challenges in the analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(16), 1953–1956.CrossRef Bonnetain, F., Fiteni, F., Efficace, F., & Anota, A. (2016). Statistical challenges in the analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(16), 1953–1956.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kiebert, G. M., Curran, D., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life as an endpoint in EORTC clinical trials european organization for research and treatment for cancer. Statistics in Medicine, 17(57), 561–569.CrossRef Kiebert, G. M., Curran, D., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life as an endpoint in EORTC clinical trials european organization for research and treatment for cancer. Statistics in Medicine, 17(57), 561–569.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hamel, J.-F., Saulnier, P., Pe, M., Zikos, E., Musoro, J., Coens, C., et al. (2017). A systematic review of the quality of statistical methods employed for analysing quality of life data in cancer randomised controlled trials. European Journal of Cancer, 83, 166–176.CrossRef Hamel, J.-F., Saulnier, P., Pe, M., Zikos, E., Musoro, J., Coens, C., et al. (2017). A systematic review of the quality of statistical methods employed for analysing quality of life data in cancer randomised controlled trials. European Journal of Cancer, 83, 166–176.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chinot, O. L., Wick, W., Mason, W., Henriksson, R., Saran, F., Nishikawa, R., et al. (2014). Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(8), 709–722.CrossRef Chinot, O. L., Wick, W., Mason, W., Henriksson, R., Saran, F., Nishikawa, R., et al. (2014). Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(8), 709–722.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gilbert, M. R., Dignam, J. J., Armstrong, T. S., Wefel, J. S., Blumenthal, D. T., Vogelbaum, M. A., et al. (2014). A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(8), 699–708.CrossRef Gilbert, M. R., Dignam, J. J., Armstrong, T. S., Wefel, J. S., Blumenthal, D. T., Vogelbaum, M. A., et al. (2014). A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(8), 699–708.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fairclough, D. L. (2002). Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. (Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall, Ed.). Fairclough, D. L. (2002). Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. (Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall, Ed.).
10.
go back to reference Anota, A., Hamidou, Z., Paget-Bailly, S., Chibaudel, B., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Auquier, P., et al. (2015). Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: Do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization? Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 5–18.CrossRef Anota, A., Hamidou, Z., Paget-Bailly, S., Chibaudel, B., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Auquier, P., et al. (2015). Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: Do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization? Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 5–18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barbieri, A., Peyhardi, J., Conroy, T., Gourgou, S., Lavergne, C., Mollevi, C. (2017). Item response models for the longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1). Barbieri, A., Peyhardi, J., Conroy, T., Gourgou, S., Lavergne, C., Mollevi, C. (2017). Item response models for the longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1).
12.
go back to reference Barbieri, A., Anota, A., Conroy, T., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Juzyna, B., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2016). Applying the longitudinal model from item response theory to assess health-related quality of life in the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 36(5), 615–628.CrossRef Barbieri, A., Anota, A., Conroy, T., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Juzyna, B., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2016). Applying the longitudinal model from item response theory to assess health-related quality of life in the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 36(5), 615–628.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Anota, A., Barbieri, A., Savina, M., Pam, A., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2014). Comparison of three longitudinal analysis models for the health-related quality of life in oncology: a simulation study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1326. Anota, A., Barbieri, A., Savina, M., Pam, A., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2014). Comparison of three longitudinal analysis models for the health-related quality of life in oncology: a simulation study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1326.
14.
go back to reference Charton, E., Cuer, B., Cottone, F., Efficace, F., Touraine, C., Hamidou, Z., et al. (2020). Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 29(4), 867–878.CrossRef Charton, E., Cuer, B., Cottone, F., Efficace, F., Touraine, C., Hamidou, Z., et al. (2020). Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 29(4), 867–878.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Van der Linden, W. J., Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (Vol. Springer Verlag, New York). Van der Linden, W. J., Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (Vol. Springer Verlag, New York).
17.
go back to reference Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Savina, M., Anota, A., Barbieri, A., Azria, D., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2018). Longitudinal health-related quality of life analysis in oncology with time to event approaches, the STATA command qlqc30_TTD. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 158, 153–159.CrossRef Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Savina, M., Anota, A., Barbieri, A., Azria, D., Bonnetain, F., et al. (2018). Longitudinal health-related quality of life analysis in oncology with time to event approaches, the STATA command qlqc30_TTD. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 158, 153–159.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Troxel, A. B., Fairclough, D. L., Curran, D., & Hahn, E. A. (1998). Statistical analysis of quality of life with missing data in cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 17(5–7), 653–666.CrossRef Troxel, A. B., Fairclough, D. L., Curran, D., & Hahn, E. A. (1998). Statistical analysis of quality of life with missing data in cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 17(5–7), 653–666.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Oza, A. M., Matulonis, U. A., Malander, S., Hudgens, S., Sehouli, J., del Campo, J. M., et al. (2018). Quality of life in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA): Results from a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology, 19(8), 1117–1125.CrossRef Oza, A. M., Matulonis, U. A., Malander, S., Hudgens, S., Sehouli, J., del Campo, J. M., et al. (2018). Quality of life in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA): Results from a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology, 19(8), 1117–1125.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Azria, D., Belkacemi, Y., Romieu, G., Gourgou, S., Gutowski, M., Zaman, K., et al. (2010). Concurrent or sequential adjuvant letrozole and radiotherapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer (CO-HO-RT): a phase 2 randomised trial. The lancet oncology, 11(3), 258–265.CrossRef Azria, D., Belkacemi, Y., Romieu, G., Gourgou, S., Gutowski, M., Zaman, K., et al. (2010). Concurrent or sequential adjuvant letrozole and radiotherapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer (CO-HO-RT): a phase 2 randomised trial. The lancet oncology, 11(3), 258–265.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carayol, M., Romieu, G., Bleuse, J. P., Senesse, P., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Sari, C., et al. (2013). Adapted physical activity and diet (APAD) during adjuvant breast cancer therapy: Design and implementation of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 36, 531–543.CrossRef Carayol, M., Romieu, G., Bleuse, J. P., Senesse, P., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Sari, C., et al. (2013). Adapted physical activity and diet (APAD) during adjuvant breast cancer therapy: Design and implementation of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 36, 531–543.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Carayol, M., Ninot, G., Senesse, P., Bleuse, J.-P., Gourgou, S., Sancho-Garnier, H., et al. (2019). Short- and long-term impact of adapted physical activity and diet counseling during adjuvant breast cancer therapy: The “APAD1” randomized controlled trial. BMC cancer, 19(1), 737.CrossRef Carayol, M., Ninot, G., Senesse, P., Bleuse, J.-P., Gourgou, S., Sancho-Garnier, H., et al. (2019). Short- and long-term impact of adapted physical activity and diet counseling during adjuvant breast cancer therapy: The “APAD1” randomized controlled trial. BMC cancer, 19(1), 737.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dabakuyo, T. S., Guillemin, F., Conroy, T., Velten, M., Jolly, D., Mercier, M., et al. (2013). Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: A multicenter cohort study. Quality of life research, 22(1), 1–11.CrossRef Dabakuyo, T. S., Guillemin, F., Conroy, T., Velten, M., Jolly, D., Mercier, M., et al. (2013). Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: A multicenter cohort study. Quality of life research, 22(1), 1–11.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hebbar, M., Chibaudel, B., Andre, T., Mineur, L., Smith, D., Louvet, C., et al. (2015). FOLFOX4 versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MIROX): A pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing with perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy from an open-label, randomized phase III trial. Annals of Oncology, 26, 1040.CrossRef Hebbar, M., Chibaudel, B., Andre, T., Mineur, L., Smith, D., Louvet, C., et al. (2015). FOLFOX4 versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MIROX): A pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing with perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy from an open-label, randomized phase III trial. Annals of Oncology, 26, 1040.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Conroy, T., Galais, M.-P., Raoul, J.-L., Bouché, O., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Douillard, J.-Y., et al. (2014). Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): Final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. The lancet oncology, 15(3), 305–314.CrossRef Conroy, T., Galais, M.-P., Raoul, J.-L., Bouché, O., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Douillard, J.-Y., et al. (2014). Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): Final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. The lancet oncology, 15(3), 305–314.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Conroy, T., Desseigne, F., Ychou, M., Bouché, O., Guimbaud, R., Bécouarn, Y., et al. (2011). FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 364(19), 1817–1825.CrossRef Conroy, T., Desseigne, F., Ychou, M., Bouché, O., Guimbaud, R., Bécouarn, Y., et al. (2011). FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 364(19), 1817–1825.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chauffert, B., Feuvret, L., Bonnetain, F., Taillandier, L., Frappaz, D., Taillia, H., et al. (2014). Randomized phase II trial of irinotecan and bevacizumab as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant to temozolomide-based chemoradiation compared with temozolomide-chemoradiation for unresectable glioblastoma: Final results of the TEMAVIR study from ANOCEF†. Annals of Oncology, 25(7), 1442–1447.CrossRef Chauffert, B., Feuvret, L., Bonnetain, F., Taillandier, L., Frappaz, D., Taillia, H., et al. (2014). Randomized phase II trial of irinotecan and bevacizumab as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant to temozolomide-based chemoradiation compared with temozolomide-chemoradiation for unresectable glioblastoma: Final results of the TEMAVIR study from ANOCEF†. Annals of Oncology, 25(7), 1442–1447.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Musoro, Z. J., Hamel, J.-F., Ediebah, D. E., Cocks, K., King, M. T., Groenvold, M., et al. (2018). Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e019117. Musoro, Z. J., Hamel, J.-F., Ediebah, D. E., Cocks, K., King, M. T., Groenvold, M., et al. (2018). Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e019117.
30.
go back to reference Taphoorn, M. J. B., Henriksson, R., Bottomley, A., Cloughesy, T., Wick, W., Mason, W. P., et al. (2015). Health-related quality of life in a randomized phase iii study of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(19), 2166–2175.CrossRef Taphoorn, M. J. B., Henriksson, R., Bottomley, A., Cloughesy, T., Wick, W., Mason, W. P., et al. (2015). Health-related quality of life in a randomized phase iii study of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(19), 2166–2175.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., et al. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309(8), 814–822.CrossRef Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., et al. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309(8), 814–822.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bottomley, A., Pe, M., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Bonnetain, F., Calvert, M., et al. (2016). Analysing data from patient-reported outcome and quality of life endpoints for cancer clinical trials: a start in setting international standards. The Lancet. Oncology, 17(11), e510–e514.CrossRef Bottomley, A., Pe, M., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Bonnetain, F., Calvert, M., et al. (2016). Analysing data from patient-reported outcome and quality of life endpoints for cancer clinical trials: a start in setting international standards. The Lancet. Oncology, 17(11), e510–e514.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bottomley, A., Pe, M., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Bonnetain, F., Calvert, M., Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL) Consortium. (2018). Moving forward toward standardizing analysis of quality of life data in randomized cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 1740774518795637. Bottomley, A., Pe, M., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Bonnetain, F., Calvert, M., Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL) Consortium. (2018). Moving forward toward standardizing analysis of quality of life data in randomized cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 1740774518795637.
Metagegevens
Titel
Longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: methods and interpretation of results
Auteurs
Caroline Bascoul-Mollevi
Antoine Barbieri
Céline Bourgier
Thierry Conroy
Bruno Chauffert
Mohamed Hebbar
William Jacot
Beata Juzyna
Hélène De Forges
Sophie Gourgou
Franck Bonnetain
Célia Touraine
Amélie Anota
Publicatiedatum
18-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02605-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Quality of Life Research 1/2021 Naar de uitgave