Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Chronic axial low-back pain is a debilitating disorder that impacts all aspects of an afflicted individual’s life. Effective, durable treatments have historically been elusive. Interventional therapies, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), have shown limited efficacy at best. Recently, a novel treatment, 10 kHz SCS, has demonstrated superior pain relief compared with traditional SCS in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In this manuscript, we report on the long-term improvements in quality of life (QoL) outcomes for subjects enrolled in this study.
A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SENZA-RCT) was conducted. Patients with both chronic back and leg pain were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into 10 kHz SCS or traditional SCS treatment groups. A total of 171 subjects received a permanent SCS device implant. QoL and functionality measures were collected up to 12 months. The device remote control utilization, which is an indication of patient interaction with the device for adjustments, was collected at 24-month post-implantation.
At 12 months, a higher proportion of 10 kHz SCS subjects had marked improvement of their disability (Oswestry Disability Index) to a “moderate” or “minimal” impact on their daily function versus the control group. The subjects also reported better improvement in the Global Assessment of Functioning, Clinician Global Impression of Change, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, compared to traditional SCS subjects. The 10 kHz SCS subjects also reported far higher rates of both driving and sleeping with their device turned on, as well as reduced reliance on their programmers to adjust therapy settings.
In addition to superior pain relief, 10 kHz SCS provides long-term improvements in quality of life and functionality for subjects with chronic low-back and leg pain. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01609972).
Burton, A. K., Balagué, F., Cardon, G., Eriksen, H. R., Henrotin, Y., Lahad, A., et al. (2006). Chapter 2 European guidelines for prevention in low back pain: November 2004. European Spine Journal, 15(Suppl 2), S136–S168.
Luo, X., Pietrobon, R., Sun, S. X., Liu, G. G., & Hey, L. (2004). Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29(1), 79–86. CrossRef
Institute of Medicine Committee on Advancing Pain Research, C., and Education. (2011). Care of people with pain, relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Kumar, K., Taylor, R. S., Jacques, L., Eldabe, S., Meglio, M., Molet, J., et al. (2007). Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain, 132(1–2), 179–188. PubMedCrossRef
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 19(150), 971–979. CrossRef
Kumar, K., Taylor, R. S., Jacques, L., Eldabe, S., Meglio, M., Molet, J., et al. (2008) The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: A 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery, 63(4), 762–770 ( discussion 770). PubMedCrossRef
Oakley, J. (2006). Spinal cord stimulation in axial low back pain: Solving the dilemma. Pain Medicine, 7(S1), 58–63. CrossRef
Cameron, T., & Alo, K. M. (1998) Effects of posture on stimulation parameters in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 1(4), 177–183. CrossRef
Ross, E., & Abejón, D. (2014) Improving patient experience with spinal cord stimulation: Implications of position-related changes in neurostimulation. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 17, 36–41. CrossRef
De Carolis, G., et al. (2017). Paresthesia-independence: An assessment of technical factors related to 10 kHz paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation. Pain Physician, 20(4), 331–341. PubMed
Kapural, L., Yu, C., Doust, M. W., Gliner, B. E., Vallejo, R., Sitzman, B. T., et al. (2016). Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery, 79(5), 667–677. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Andrell, P., Yu, W., Gersbach, P., Gillberg, L., Pehrsson, K., Hardy, I., et al. (2010). Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris—results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL). Heart, 96(14), 1132–1136. PubMedCrossRef
Manca, A., Kumar, K., Taylor, R. S., Jacques, L., Eldabe, S., Meglio, M., et al. (2008). Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial). European Journal of Pain, 12(8), 1047–1058. PubMedCrossRef
Spincemaille, G. H., Klomp, H. M., Steyerberg, E. W., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2000). Pain and quality of life in patients with critical limb ischaemia: Results of a randomized controlled multicentre study on the effect of spinal cord stimulation. ESES study group. European Journal of Pain, 4(2), 173–184. PubMedCrossRef
Kapural, L., Yu, C., Doust, M. W., Gliner, B. E., Vallejo, R., Sitzman, B. T., et al. (2015). Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain. The SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 123(4), 851–860. PubMedCrossRef
Fairbank, J. C., Couper, J., & O’Brien, J. P. (1980). The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy, 66(8), 271–273. PubMed
ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. (1976). Rockville: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Parker, S. L., Mendenhall, S. K., Shau, D., Adogwa, O., Cheng, J. S., Anderson, W. N., et al. (2012). Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, 16(1), 61–67. PubMedCrossRef
Monticone, M., Baiardi, P., Vanti, C., Ferrari, S., Pillastrini, P., Mugnai, R., & Foti, C. (2012). Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal, 21(1), 122–129. PubMedCrossRef
Copay, A. G., Glassman, S. D., Subach, B. R., Berven, S., Schuler, T. C., & Carreon, L. Y. (2008). Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. The Spine Journal, 8(6), 968–974. PubMedCrossRef
Glassman, S. D., Berven, S., Kostuik, J., Dimar, J. R., Horton, W. C., & Bridwell, K. (2006). Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31(8), 941–947. CrossRef
Johnsen, L. G., Hellum, C., Nygaard, ØP., Storheim, K., Brox, J. I., Rossvoll, I., et al. (2013). Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14, 148. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Schultz, D. M., Webster, L., Kosek, P., Dar, U., Tan, Y., & Sun, M. (2012). Sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Pain Physician, 15(1), 1–12. PubMed
- Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT
Matthew W. Doust
Bradford E. Gliner
Donna M. Morgan
B. Todd Sitzman
Thomas L. Yearwood
Abram H. Burgher
Elizabeth S. Brooks
Ashley A. Powell
- Springer International Publishing