Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2018

21-08-2018

Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Auteurs: S. Traversoni, J. Jutai, C. Fundarò, S. Salvini, R. Casale, A. Giardini

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Assistive technologies are widely implemented in clinical and research settings. Despite their dissemination, the psychosocial impact of their adoption still deserves further consideration. The aim of the present study is to determine the degree of compatibility between the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Methods

Six health professionals (two neurologists, one neuro-rehabilitation technician, two psychologists, one university professor of rehabilitation) created a technical board to discuss upon the PIADS–ICF linking. The standardized linking methodology was applied, and a Delphi technique was used to examine consensus.

Results

Five Delphi sessions were required to reach 100% of consensus and to finalize the procedure. Of the 26 PIADS’ items, 23 were linked to an ICF category: 9 items were endorsed at the 3rd ICF level, and 14 items at the 2nd ICF level. Two items were classified as “not defined” and 1 item as “not covered”.

Conclusion

The study highlighted the conceptual connection between the PIADS and the ICF framework and set a bio-psychosocial standpoint by which accounting the role of assistive devices in rehabilitation settings.
vorige artikel Assessment of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in a homogeneous population under lifetime arsenic exposure
volgende artikel Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM)
Voetnoten
1
For further information, contact Jeffrey Jutai: jjutai@uottawa.ca.
 
Literatuur
1.
Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., & Stucki, G. (2018). Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 54(1), 110–117.PubMed
2.
3.
Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Üstün, T. B. (2016). Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: Requirements and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(4), 223–228.CrossRef
4.
Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Melvin, J. (2007). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285.CrossRef
5.
6.
World Health Organisation. (2001). ICF. Geneva: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
7.
Stucki, G., & Grimby, G. (2004). Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 5–6.CrossRef
8.
Escorpizo, R., Kostanjsek, N., Kennedy, C., et al. (2013). Harmonizing WHO’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Importance and methods to link disease and functioning. BMC Public Health, 13, 742.CrossRef
9.
Stucki, G. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(10), 733–740.CrossRef
10.
11.
Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(5), 281–282.CrossRef
12.
13.
Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.CrossRef
14.
Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., et al. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.CrossRef
15.
16.
Ballert, C., Hopfe, M., Kus, S., et al. (2016). Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: A systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14, 1–17.CrossRef
17.
Fayed, N., Cieza, A., & Bickenbach, J. E. (2011). Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: A systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(21–22), 1941–1951.CrossRef
18.
Letellier, M. E., Dawes, D., & Mayo, N. (2015). Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research, 24, 757–768.CrossRef
19.
Nicol, R., Robinson, N. M., Hopfe, M., & Newell, D. (2016). Linking the Bournemouth Questionnaire for low back pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(11), 1089–1096.CrossRef
20.
Wong, A. W. K., Lau, S. C. L., Cella, D., et al. (2017). Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Quality of Life Research, 26(9), 2435–2448.CrossRef
21.
22.
Figueiredo, D. (2014). Linking the EASY-Care Standard to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(7), 593–599.CrossRef
23.
Sommer, R., Bullinger, M., Rohenkohl, A., et al. (2015). Linking a short-stature specific health-related quality of life measure (QoLISSY) to the International Classification of Functioning-Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(5), 439–446.CrossRef
24.
Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159–168.
25.
Day, H., Jutai, J., & Campbell, K. A. (2002). Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Lessons learned and the road ahead. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 31–37.CrossRef
26.
Garry, J., Casey, K., Cole, T. K., et al. (2016). A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care. Surgery, 159(3), 938–944.CrossRef
27.
Fundarò, C., Giardini, A., Maestri, R., Traversoni, S., Bartolo, M., & Casale, R. (2018). Motor and psychosocial impact of robot-assisted gait training in a real-world rehabilitation setting: A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0191894.CrossRef
28.
Borgestig, M., Falkmer, T., & Hemmingsson, H. (2013). Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: A pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(6), 463–470.CrossRef
29.
Pettersson, I., Ahlstrom, G., & Tornquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.CrossRef
30.
MacPhee, A. H., Kirby, R. L., Coolen, A. L., et al. (2004). Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(1), 41–50.CrossRef
31.
Andrich, R., Salatino, C., Converti, R. M., et al. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of powered wheelchairs: Findings of a study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 84–91.PubMed
32.
33.
Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J. W. (2013). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17(3–4), 63–79.
34.
Ward, A. L., Hammond, S., Holsten, S., et al. (2015). Power wheelchair use in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Changes over time. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 238–245.CrossRef
35.
Salatino, C., Andrich, R., Converti, R. M., & Saruggia, M. (2016). An observational study of powered wheelchair provision in Italy. Assistive Technology, 28(1), 41–52.CrossRef
36.
Buning, M. E., Angelo, J. A., & Schmeler, M. R. (2001). Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: A pilot study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 339–344.CrossRef
37.
Pousada García, T., Groba González, B., Rivero, N. L., et al (2015). Exploring the psychosocial impact of wheelchair and contextual factors on quality of life of people with neuromuscular disorders. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 246–256.CrossRef
38.
Pettersson, I., Ahlström, G., & Törnquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.CrossRef
39.
Giesbrecht, E. M., Ripat, J. D., Quanbury, A. O., et al. (2009). Participation in community-based activities of daily living: Comparison of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 198–207.PubMed
40.
Stucki, G. (2016). Olle Höök lectureship 2015: The World Health Organization’s paradigm shift and implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(6), 486–493.CrossRef
41.
World Health Organization. (1980). ICIDH. Geneva: International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps.
42.
Trabacca, A., Moro, G., Gennaro, L., & Russo, L. (2012). When one plus one equals three: The ICF perspective of health and disability in the third millennium. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(4), 709–710.PubMed
43.
Stucki, G., Ewert, T., & Cieza, A. (2002). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(17), 932–938.CrossRef
44.
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2013). Cook and Husseys’ assistive technologies, (4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby
45.
Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107–111.
46.
Andrich, R., Pedroni, F., & Vanni, G. (2003). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Italian localization of the PIADS instrument. In G. Craddock et al. (Eds.), Assistive technology: Shaping the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
47.
Day, H., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., et al. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404.CrossRef
48.
Jutai, J., Day, H., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2004). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry, 74(5), 299–308.
49.
Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., et al. (2002). Reliability, validity and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 21–30.CrossRef
50.
Harada, N., Fong, S., Heiney, C., et al. (2014). Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Developmen, 51(2), 275–283.CrossRef
51.
52.
53.
Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237.CrossRef
54.
Darzins, S. W., Imms, C., & Di Stefano, M. (2016). Measurement of activity limitations and participation restrictions: Examination of ICF-linked content and scale properties of the FIM and PC-PART instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(10), 1025–1038.CrossRef
55.
Annicchiarico, R. (2012). Enhancing service delivering, improving quality of life, preserving independence through assistive technology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 180, 14–18.PubMed
56.
Hwang, C. S., Weng, H. H., Wang, L. F., et al. (2014). An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers burden. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(4), 233–238.CrossRef
57.
Baldassin, V., Shimizu, H. E., & Fachin-Martins, E. (2018). Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 27(3), 597–607.CrossRef
58.
59.
Post, M. (2014). Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 20(3), 167–180.CrossRef
60.
61.
Hwang, K., & Mpofu, E. (2010). Health care quality assessments. In E. Mpofu & T. Oakland (Eds.), Rehabilitation and health assessment: Applying ICF guidelines (pp. 141–161). New York: Springer.
Metagegevens
Titel
Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
Auteurs
S. Traversoni
J. Jutai
C. Fundarò
S. Salvini
R. Casale
A. Giardini
Publicatiedatum
21-08-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2018

Quality of Life Research 12/2018 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Child maltreatment as a social determinant of midlife health-related quality of life in women: do psychosocial factors explain this association?

OriginalPaper

Quality of life and stability of tooth color change at three months after dental bleaching

OriginalPaper

Health-related quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Pakistan

OriginalPaper

A qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics

OriginalPaper

Physical training following gastric bypass: effects on physical activity and quality of life—a randomized controlled trial

OriginalPaper

Impact of further injury on participation in work and activities among those previously injured: results from a New Zealand prospective cohort study