Ghosts in the Schoolyard Racism and School Closings on Chicago's South Side
by Eve L. Ewing
University of Chicago Press, 2018
Cloth: 978-0-226-52602-7 | Paper: 978-0-226-52616-4 | Electronic: 978-0-226-52633-1
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

“Failing schools. Underprivileged schools. Just plain bad schools.”
 
That’s how Eve L. Ewing opens Ghosts in the Schoolyard: describing Chicago Public Schools from the outside. The way politicians and pundits and parents of kids who attend other schools talk about them, with a mix of pity and contempt.
 
But Ewing knows Chicago Public Schools from the inside: as a student, then a teacher, and now a scholar who studies them. And that perspective has shown her that public schools are not buildings full of failures—they’re an integral part of their neighborhoods, at the heart of their communities, storehouses of history and memory that bring people together.
 
Never was that role more apparent than in 2013 when Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced an unprecedented wave of school closings. Pitched simultaneously as a solution to a budget problem, a response to declining enrollments, and a chance to purge bad schools that were dragging down the whole system, the plan was met with a roar of protest from parents, students, and teachers. But if these schools were so bad, why did people care so much about keeping them open, to the point that some would even go on a hunger strike?
 
Ewing’s answer begins with a story of systemic racism, inequality, bad faith, and distrust that stretches deep into Chicago history. Rooting her exploration in the historic African American neighborhood of Bronzeville, Ewing reveals that this issue is about much more than just schools. Black communities see the closing of their schools—schools that are certainly less than perfect but that are theirs—as one more in a long line of racist policies. The fight to keep them open is yet another front in the ongoing struggle of black people in America to build successful lives and achieve true self-determination.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Eve L. Ewing is assistant professor at the University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration. She is the author of Electric Arches, and her work has appeared in the New York Times, New Yorker, Atlantic, Washington Post, and many other venues. She was born in Chicago, where she still lives.
 

REVIEWS

"Ewing masterfully illuminates the alternate realities, histories, calculations, and languages that were at play in closing dozens of predominately Black schools in Chicago. Those schools now reside in the ghostly world, and Ewing acts as a keen shaman, reminding us of what has been lost and instructing us on how to value Black children's education going forward. A powerful book on so many levels."
— Mary Pattillo, author of Black on the Block

"A chilling must-read investigation of racism in Chicago’s education system. . . .In addition to its poignant content and touching cast of characters, this book is technically superb. Ewing’s crisp prose is succinct and inviting, never lacking in energy. This book never backs down from critiquing the housing, education, and legal systems that contribute to the plight of certain communities in Chicago. . . . Eve L. Ewing's Ghosts in the Schoolyard deftly details a microcosm of a larger picture where some people’s freedoms are much more complicated than others."
 
— Foreword Reviews

"Ghosts in the Schoolyard is an engaging, critical, and accessible analysis of the Chicago Public School closings. With brilliant analysis and beautiful prose, Eve Ewing lends a window into the local and national political struggles, historical processes of marginalization and isolation, and contemporary market logics that have produced the current educational moment. Equally important, Ewing never loses track of the various ways that students, teachers, and parents have resisted the processes and discourses of school closing. This is a rare and urgent text that should be read by scholars, parents, teachers, and students alike."
— Marc Lamont Hill, author of Nobody: Casualties of America’s War on the Vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and Beyond

"Two questions permeate this study: 'If the schools were so terrible, why did people fight for them so adamantly?' and 'What role did race, power, and history play in what was happening in my hometown?' . . . The deeply moving final chapter addresses the Bronzeville community’s sense of mourning in the loss of 'institutions, like our schools that have helped shape our sense of who we are.' Ewing's work, a tribute to students, parents, teachers, and community members, is essential for general readers confronting the issues of 'school choice' and school funding, as well as useful for historians of the African-American experience."
— Publishers Weekly

"If only for widening the scope of the debate over public schools, Eve Ewing’s new book is a welcome entry to the conversation. Rejecting the impulse to see education as disconnected from American life and politics, Ghosts in the Schoolyard links the struggles of Chicago public schooling with the city’s notoriously racist housing practices. Ewing peels back the seemingly anodyne messaging of reform ('school choice') and its ostensibly objective standards ('test scores') to reveal the insidious assumptions lying beneath. 
            Perhaps most importantly, Ewing gives direct voice to those served by those schools often dismissed as failing. What she finds is that these schools are often among the last working institutions in neighborhoods which have been systematically stripped of everything else. Mixing history, sociology, and even memoir, Ghosts in the Schoolyard is an important addition to any conversation about the future of public schools and those they were designed to serve."
 
— Ta-Nehisi Coates

"In Ghosts in the Schoolyard, Eve Ewing dramatically uncovers the deleterious effects of school closings in the Chicago inner-city community of Bronzeville. With noteworthy prose, this powerful research study illuminates the role of implicit racism, segregation, school policy, and housing policy in school closings and their subsequent impact on students, parents and teachers. Ewing's revelatory analysis is a must-read for anyone concerned about the future of urban communities, especially the public schools populated with students of color."
— William Julius Wilson

"In Ghosts in the Schoolyard, we listen to the anguished and angry voices of parents, teachers, students, and community members who expose the currents of deceit, shaming, and racism that are embedded in the bureaucratic language and metrics that seek to rationalize the school closings on Chicago’s South Side. In this heartbreaking and revelatory narrative, Eve Ewing is the disciplined observer, the generous witness, the probing analyst, and the soulful poet who hears the grieving and the grace in their 'institutional mourning.'"
 
— Sara Lawrence-Lightfoot, Emily Hargroves Fisher Professor of Education, Harvard University

"Ewing is a Harvard-trained sociologist as well as a poet and an educator (among other things), and this comes through in her lively and accessible writing."
 
— Booklist, starred review

,"A powerful account. . . . Ewing's book thrums with an activist's outrage. . . . Ewing gracefully melds reportage, heartbreak, ire and history in a book that showcases the city’s education and racial tensions as a microcosm for the nation’s amalgamated woes."
— New City

"Bracing. . . . Most important, this book effectively connects school closings in largely African American neighborhoods to the devaluation of black lives in general. Ewing's graceful prose enlivens what might otherwise be a depressing topic in this timely, powerful read. Recommended."
— Library Journal

"The best book about education this year. . . . The book reads like a novel.  . . . Let me add that I have waited for this book for a long time, not knowing if it would ever be written. History told from the point of view of those who were acted on, rather than the point of view of those at the top of the pyramid. Whose story will be told and who will tell it? Eve Ewing has told it. . . . I found it difficult to put down."
 
— Diane Ravitch

"This superbly written and researched account is at once poignant and deeply troubling, blending the personal and the academic in a way that makes the heavy subject matter accessible. Ghosts is essential reading for anyone trying to better understand the intersection of segregation and education--as well as the importance of preserving the public institutions that help shape communities."
— Juan Vidal, NPR, Best Books of 2018

"What makes this book more than an inflated explainer on racism and school closings is Ewing’s analytic methods, and in particular how eager she is to share them with the reader. The choices she makes, both as a writer and as a sociologist, are well considered and explained in the text. . . . Ewing is less interested in showing off the depth of her reading than in convincing us that theory is more aligned with our experiential knowledge than we might otherwise think. One of the clearest signs of her lack of egotism is how willing she is to cede analytic insight to the people in her community. . . . Ewing’s mission is to present critical theory and sociology in a way that makes her readers feel capable of enacting both."
 
— The Nation

"'A fight for a school is never just about a school,' Ewing notes in her bracing account . . , relying on a blend of historical and ethnographic research to show how the closures were only the most recent manifestation of a decades-long pattern of disinvestment by Chicago Public Schools. . . . Ewing's graceful prose enlivens what might otherwise be a depressing topic in this timely, powerful read. Recommended to public, high school, and university ­libraries."
— School Library Journal, starred review

"Ewing's refusal to forgo structures for people, or people for structures, is what makes this book incendiary."
 
 
— Allegra

"Throughout the book, Ewing demands that we consider the perspectives of the students, families, and communities to whom schools belong. She insists that we sit with their pain and mourning as they fight for and sometimes lose the institutions that moored and connected them. And as she breathes life into the school, making it every bit as important a character as the people who fill it, she also expertly renders visible, tangible, and undeniable the phantasm that looms in the shadows of this story: racism. By plainly stating that Chicago’s school closures have been racist and providing ample evidence of that fact, Ewing names the invisible force shaping CPS policy, and helps us--scholars, policymakers, school leaders--imagine a path forward. . . . Whether you're an education researcher, a sociologist of race and racism, a teacher, a policy analyst, or simply a member of a school community, there is something in Ghosts in the Schoolyard for you. . . . The book is also a generative text for a qualitative methods class, given the tour-de-force of analytical methods Ewing uses. . . . Perhaps most important, though, is the fact that this book is public sociology at its best--insightful, sharp, and with a clear sense of its scholarly lineage, without being inaccessible or unnecessarily abstruse."
 
— Contexts

"Within sociology, ethnographers are sometimes considered foot soldiers of the discipline. The trained ethnographer enters a community, often one that is not their own, in an effort to expand our knowledge of the social world through an in-depth study of culture. A good ethnography offers a revealing glimpse into a social system, an understanding of everyday actors and insights into how everyday actions, interactions, and events are patterned by culture and structure. A great ethnography goes beyond this by advancing theory and uncovering hidden truths about the social world.  Ghosts in the Schoolyard surpasses both of these measures, elevating the ethnographic project to the status of art, even as the polymathic author may shy away from identifying with any one methodological tradition. Within the first few pages, readers are not only intellectually rooted in the events surrounding school closures on Chicago’s South Side, but are fully immersed in the scenes of a strange paradoxical world where it is the year 2013 in one of the richest countries in the world, and the only way to improve a school is to close it. Writing with equal parts intellectual rigor, élan, and moral clarity, Ewing offers a forceful reexamination of the prevailing logic that governs school closings in majority black neighborhoods while also inviting the reader to consider a 'dueling reality,' another version of events as seen from the perspectives of those most impacted by Chicago’s school closures."
— Harvard Educational Review

"Ghosts in the Schoolyard by Eve L. Ewing provides a powerful examination of the debilitating effects of the discourse of school 'failure' on Chicago
public schools...Ewing explains school closures in a succinct manner, and her style of writing allows all to decipher the poignant points made in this book. Additionally, Ewing’s positionality as a Chicago native, and later a teacher in Chicago, is very important as it allows the reader to understand the landscape and history of Chicago from the standpoint of an insider...I highly recommend this book for all, especially for those interested in sociology, urban education, race, ethnicity, and qualitative research methods."
— Mercy Agyepong, American Journal of Sociology

"This heart-rending analysis demonstrates the intersection of racism, politics, and power and its effects on schools, parents, children, and the community in which they exist. It is an incredibly moving and meaningful text that anyone who cares about public education should read."
— O.L. Davis, Jr. Book Award Committee, 2019 O.L. Davis, Jr Outstanding Book Award Winner

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0001
[Gwendolyn Brooks;school closures;failure;race;discourse;Bronzeville;racism]
This introduction presents the main questions of the text: why do people care about “failing” schools, and why do they fight to save them? This book focuses on the 2013 wave of Chicago Public Schools closures by mayor Rahm Emanuel, particularly as they affected Bronzeville, historic hub of African American culture. Claiming these schools were underutilized and underresourced, the official narrative for these closures claimed the schools were “failing.” This chapter introduces the social, structural forces that frame the valuation of schools; the dissonance in valuation being the reason people fight so to save their schools. The introduction also explores the author’s positionality as a Chicago native, a Bronzeville teacher, and an education researcher. Using field observations, document analyses, review of audio transcripts, and interviews with community members, this book investigates the role race plays in these school closures, as well as the people affected by them.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0002
[Walter Henri Dyett;hunger strikes;protest;Barbara Byrd-Bennett;Rahm Emanuel;Chicago;public schools;Bronzeville]
This chapter discusses the sequence of events around Walter H. Dyett High School, a public school in Chicago slated for closure. Walter Dyett was himself a local music educator, so this institution inherently represented local excellence and commitment to community investment. Although it was deemed “failing,” the community resisted this valuation in their fierce fight led by The Coalition to Revitalize Dyett, culminating in a thirty-four-day hunger strike. This chapter includes testimonies from community members affiliated with the school and analyzes rhetoric of the political hierarchy that controlled Dyett’s future. Although organizing efforts such as rallies, sit-ins, and civil disobedience culminated in a reversal of the decision to close the school, Dyett reopened only because of the mayor’s ability to frame this debacle as a milestone of inclusivity and a victory of the community. This narrative manipulation mounted distrust of systemic designers like CPS and the City Council.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0003
[Bronzeville;Great Migration;segregation;restrictive covenants;Benjamin Willis;Chicago Housing Authority;public housing;underutilization;school closures]
This chapter contextualizes the school closures by reviewing the history behind community school construction and Chicago’s geographic segregation, beginning with the Black population explosion during the first Great Migration. Segregation, through a combination of social standards and legal policy, made Bronzeville into a booming business, political, and cultural hub, whose borders led to a dense concentration of Black people in one community. New schools built in then-overpopulated Bronzeville were meant accommodate the dense population of Black children and to maintain de facto segregation. Years later, the 1999 Plan for Transformation attempted to tackle the Chicago Housing Authority’s role in reinforcing segregation, but instead drained Bronzeville of a large proportion of its child population—thereby decreasing school enrollment. Regardless of official narrative, the CHA and CPS were major players in constructing and preserving racial segregation. Fifty-five years apart, Benjamin Willis and Barbara Byrd-Bennett used similar rhetoric to deny that racism affects issues with Chicago schools, claiming that statistics pointing to a racial parallel are purely coincidental.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0004
[critical discourse analysis;failing schools;history;fictive kinship;community hearings;Bronzeville;school closures]
This chapter asks: What are the lived implications of dissonance between CPS officials and the communities affiliated with the schools? To analyze the former, the chapter describes the quantitative measures used to characterize a school as “failing” and the consequences of exclusively emphasizing quantitative evidence in evaluating schools. For the latter, the chapter includes and analyzes community testimonies presented at hearings for three Bronzeville schools as they were slated to close. While officials use causal language that points to quantifiable metrics of performance and efficiency, community members focus on history, legacy, family, to show a more holistic valuation. This dissonance between Black community members and the white governance is at best neglected and at worst exploited. An example given is the trope of family present in testimonies from students, parents, teachers, and community members. Biological family, fictive kinship, and broader historical traditions evidence the depth of the bonds the community has with its schools.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0005
[institutional mourning;ghosts;death;grief;African-Americans;school closures;communitarianism]
This chapter begins by examining African Americans’ inclination to prioritize the communitarianism over individualism, and the way these communal bonds extend to mourning. By analyzing the multidimensional roles institutions have historically held in the lives of African Americans, one will find symptoms of grief in the testimonies of Bronzeville residents; in this chapter such grief is framed as an emergent theory of "institutional mourning," a phenomenon in which community members mourn an institution in the way they would mourn a person. The process of school closure would be different if officials were to consider institutional mourning as a factor, and weigh the emotional consequences of closure. The chapter also introduces the metaphor of ghost stories to examine the way narratives of loss actually work to remember history and energize community in the task of resisting erasure.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.003.0006
[racism;Ida B. Wells;education policy;school closures;participatory democracy]
Whether there is any hope for truly democratic participation in their school system, stakeholders have established that their values and opinions are deeply rooted. When considering a school’s value, one must consider the role it serves for community—functionally and ideologically—historically, presently, and in the futures to come. Despite Barbara Byrd-Bennett’s claims that Chicago school closures were the product of a “utilization crisis,” situating the 2013 school closures within the context of racism against Bronzeville and other African American communities in Chicago demonstrates a long arc of policy decisions made for a people without their input. This chapter claims that this deceptive framing of the school problem inhibits people from creating and choosing restorative solutions, but continuing to envision schools designed by and for stakeholders is an integral part of pushing forward.