World J Mens Health. 2020 Oct;38(4):472-483. English.
Published online Jul 26, 2019.
Copyright © 2020 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology
Review

Sperm and Seminal Plasma Proteomics: Molecular Changes Associated with Varicocele-Mediated Male Infertility

Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam and Ashok Agarwal
    • American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Received January 28, 2019; Revised June 03, 2019; Accepted June 18, 2019.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Male infertility is a rising problem and the etiology at the molecular level is unclear. Use of omics has provided an insight into the underlying cellular changes in the spermatozoa of infertile men. Proteomics is one the promising omics techniques for biomarker screening that can provide complete information on molecular processes associated with male infertility. Varicocele is a pressing issue in the field of male infertility and the search for an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker is still ongoing. In this review, we discuss the reports on proteomic profiles of sperm and seminal plasma in male infertility and provide an in-depth insight into varicocele studies associated with male infertility.

Keywords
Proteomics; Seminal plasma; Sperm; Varicocele

INTRODUCTION

Currently, infertility is one of the top most concerns related to male reproductive dysfunction and male infertility contributes to nearly 50% of overall infertility cases [1]. The incidence of varicocele is about 21% to 41% in men with primary infertility and 75% to 80% in men with secondary infertility [2, 3]. Varicocele is characterized by the enlargement of the pampiniform plexus, which may be due to the presence of malfunctioning valves. In these patients, testicular function is affected due to the retrograde flow of blood. Thus, varicocele has a detrimental effect on spermatogenesis by inducing a state of testicular hyperthermia, hypoxia and oxidative stress [4, 5, 6]. In addition, the reflux of metabolites and endocrine factors are associated with varicocele pathophysiology (Fig. 1). The mechanisms associated with the pathophysiology of varicocele have been reviewed in detail by Agarwal et al [7] and Cho et al [6]. Furthermore, varicocele drastically alters semen parameters [8, 9] and these patients exhibit compromised fertility [10].

Fig. 1
Pathophysiology of varicocele. ROS: reactive oxygen species.

Laboratory evaluation of male infertility in varicocele patients is based on basic semen analysis (sperm concentration, motility, vitality, and morphology) as per the World Health Organization 2010 guidelines [11]. Additionally, advanced laboratory tests such as those for the quantification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12] and antioxidants in semen [12], oxidation-reduction potential in ejaculated semen by Male Infertility Oxidative System (MiOXSYS®; Aytu BioScience Inc., Englewood, CO, USA) [13], and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) assessment by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay [13] and sperm chromatin structure assay [14] are used to identify the functionality of spermatozoa for further utilization in assisted reproductive technology. However, these tests lack the information on molecular changes at the subcellular level associated with the poor fertilizing ability of spermatozoa.

Advancement in the current omics techniques, especially proteomics have revolutionized the field of sperm molecular biology. Proteomics, a high throughput platform, is used to identify and select non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of male infertility [15, 16, 17]. This has facilitated the identification of cellular and molecular pathways that are being dysregulated in the spermatozoa of infertile patients [18]. Post-translational modification (PTM) of sperm proteins provide valuable information pertaining to the biomolecules associated with the fertilization potential of spermatozoa [19, 20]. Altered expression of sperm proteins in infertile patients indicate compromised spermatogenesis or defects in vital sperm functions, such as capacitation, hyperactivation and acrosome reaction, which are essential for the fertilization process [21, 22]. Another important component of semen is seminal plasma, which is constituted by the secretions derived from testes, epididymis and accessory sex glands. Seminal plasma proteins interact with and modulate sperm functions, such as capacitation, hyperactivation and acrosome reaction required for fertilization [17, 23]. In varicocele condition, these sperm functions are compromised, and sperm/seminal plasma proteomic analysis have reported altered expression of sperm and seminal plasma proteins [24, 25, 26].

In this review, we discuss the proteins involved in the regulation of sperm functions that are present in both the cellular (sperm) and fluidic component (seminal plasma) of semen. In addition, we have discussed the future of proteomics as a potential clinical tool for the diagnosis and management of varicocele patients.

BACKGROUND OF SPERM AND SEMINAL FLUID PROTEOMICS

Semen is a highly complex biofluid that contains proteins and peptides with varied functions. The main components of semen include spermatozoa (cellular) and seminal fluid (enriched with proteins). Sperm proteomics came into the limelight because of the transcriptionally and translationally inert property of spermatozoa [27]. Characterization of proteins in spermatozoa and seminal plasma provides insight into the functions of specific proteins related to fertility [28]. Sperm proteins regulate the molecular pathways such as protein and energy metabolism, PTMs, DNA damage and oxidative stress response [19, 29, 30]. Spermatogenesis involves complex processes that ultimately produce the male gamete with specialized functions. The developmental process of spermatozoa is regulated by protein-protein interaction [31]. Amaral et al [30] identified 6,198 proteins in spermatozoa and 30% of these proteins originate from the testis. Protein characterization studies revealed that a total of 898, 984, and 532 proteins were present in the sperm head, tail and both locations, respectively [32]. Protein profiling using 2-dimensional (2D)-gel matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) detected that the sperm proteins were distributed in cytoplasm (37%), mitochondria (19%), nuclear (5%), tail and flagella (3%), and acrosome (2%) [33]. For the first time in human spermatozoa, 27 proteins present in the 26S proteasome complex was mapped from 1,760 proteins using 1-dimensional (1D)-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) combined with GeLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) technique [34]. Bioinformatic tools predicted that the biological pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis are influenced by sperm proteins [18, 29, 30].

Apart from sperm proteins, seminal plasma proteins are also essential for the maintenance of sperm functionality [35]. Seminal plasma secretions are derived from the testes and accessory sex glands (Fig. 2). Seminal plasma is rich in proteins (35–55 g/L) and semenogelins are present in high abundance (80%). Only 10% of the seminal plasma proteins are contributed by seminal extracellular vesicles (including epididymosomes and prostasomes) [15, 32]. So far, 2,064 proteins have been identified in the seminal plasma [32]. About 70% of these proteins were also identified in spermatozoa [29, 36]. Altered expressions of seminal plasma proteins have a direct effect on spermatozoa homeostasis and functions. Comparative proteomic approach allows the identification of the underlying molecular causes associated with the pathology of spermatozoa. Expression of semen proteins varies from one condition to another. Proteomics analysis demonstrated the differential expression of proteins in semen and its potential use as non-invasive biomarkers in infertile men with abnormal semen parameters. In azoospermic men, the proteins ACPP (prostatic acid phosphatase), KLK3 (prostate-specific antigen, PSA), CLU (clusterin), AZGP1 (zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein), and PAEP (glycodelin) were absent in seminal plasma [37, 38]. Drabovich et al [39] validated TEX101 (testis-expressed protein 101) as a biomarker in azoospermia and ECM1 (extracellular matrix protein 1) to distinguish non-obstructive azoospermia from vasectomy. In the case of asthenozoospermia, PTPN14 (tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 14) was dysregulated [40], whereas CST3 (cystatin-C) was downregulated, and KLK3 and SEMG1 (semenogelin-1) were upregulated in oligoasthenozoospermia patients [41]. Other proteins associated with sperm function such as NPC2 (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 2), LGALS3BP (Galectin-3-binding protein), LCN1 (lipocalin-1), and PIP (prolactin-inducible protein) were downregulated in oligoasthenoteratozoospermia [42]. Proteomic studies conducted by Sharma et al [41] demonstrated the involvement of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in stress response and regulatory pathways in men with high seminal ROS. The MME (membrane metallo-endopeptidase) protein was detected in the seminal plasma of ROS positive men (≥20 relative light units (RLU)/s/×106 sperm) but was absent in ROS negative men (<20 RLU/s/×106 sperm). However, proteins FN1 (fibronectin 1) and MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor) were present only in the ROS negative group [41]. Intasqui et al [43] also reported sperm nuclear DNA damage markers using bioinformatic analysis of proteomic data. SLC2A14 (solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 14), PGK2 (phosphoglycerate kinase 2), ODF1 (outer dense fiber protein 1), CLU, VDAC2 (voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2), VDAC3 (voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3), ZPBP2 (zona pellucida-binding protein 2), and PGC (progastricsin) have been reported as potential biomarkers of sperm DNA damage.

Fig. 2
Seminal plasma: contributions of the testes and accessory sex glands, and its composition/constituents. TGF: transforming growth factor.

SHOTGUN PROTEOMIC APPROACH

Advanced proteomic techniques are used to identify the complete proteome of a cell. Integration of proteomic data with computational bioinformatic analysis helps in understanding the function of peptides and proteins in cellular pathways. In the current era of proteomics, sperm proteins that are associated with infertility are widely studied [18]. Sophisticated and complex instruments such as liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry are integrated with conventional 2D-gel electrophoresis to overcome the drawbacks of using the later technique alone. The high sensitivity and specificity of these techniques enable the detection of the maximum number of proteins in spermatozoa [44].

Prior to subjecting the protein samples to proteomic analysis, sperm and seminal plasma proteins are separated and processed for protein extraction. The extracted proteins are resolved either on 1D-gel electrophoresis or 2D-gel electrophoresis. Later, the gels are cut into pieces and the proteins are digested using trypsin. The sample is then injected into the high-throughput instrument and spectral counts are used to identify and relatively quantify the proteins. Expression of the proteins are measured by comparing the NSAF (normalized spectral abundance factor) of each protein [45]. A typical workflow involving the processing of semen samples for proteomics is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
Typical workflow involving the processing of semen samples for proteomics. 2D-GE: 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE: sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, MALDI-TOF: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight, LC-MS: liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.

Besides the gel-based proteomic approach, gel-free techniques are widely used in proteome profiling. The extracted proteins are resolved either by peptide fractionation, ion-exchange chromatography, reverse-phase chromatography, 2D-LC or off-gel electrophoresis [46]. Currently, in sperm proteomics conventional 2D-gel separation techniques are replaced by LC-based methods. The extracted proteins are digested by trypsin. Further, these proteins are passed through reverse phase columns and are separated based on their hydrophobicity [32]. The most advanced ultraperformance LC are used to resolve the proteins in both sperm and seminal plasma fractions [43, 47, 48]. The peptides separated by LC are identified using a MS instrument [49, 50].

Bioinformatic analysis provides meaningful results from the proteomic data [51]. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the identified proteins provides information about their localization, distribution and biological functions. Sophisticated programs such as Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and Metacore™ can demonstrate the interaction between proteins and the pathways dysregulated due to differential expression of proteins. STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) analysis is commonly performed to display the link between the proteins [52].

VARICOCELE AND SPERM PROTEOMICS

There are only few reports on sperm proteomics in varicocele patients that are available in the literature. Protein profiling in normozoospermic men without varicocele and oligozoospermic men with varicocele using 2D-gel electrophoresis resulted in the identification of only 15 DEPs. The authors reported that the molecular pathways involving mitochondrial proteins, cytoskeleton proteins and heat shock proteins were affected in these varicocele patients [53]. Another proteomic study conducted by the same group demonstrated changes in the expression of sperm proteins in pre- and post-varicocelectomy patients. Varicocele repair in these patients led to a significant increase in the expression of mitochondrial function protein (ATP5D), antioxidant protein (SOD1) and heat shock protein (HSPA5) [54]. It was noted that the use of the conventional 2D-gel electrophoresis was a major limitation in these studies. However, several molecular mechanisms and subcellular pathways involved in the pathophysiology of varicocele have been elucidated by employing a global proteomic approach (via a LC-MS/MS platform) and in-depth bioinformatic analysis (reviewed by Swain et al [55]).

Varicocele associated male infertility manifests as a consequence of a high state of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [56]. The expression of mitochondrial proteins in varicocele patients were found to be altered and linked to the pathophysiology of spermatozoa with mitochondrial dysfunction [55, 57]. The sperm proteomic profile of varicocele patients revealed that 87% of DEPs involved in sperm function and energy metabolism were downregulated in both unilateral and bilateral varicocele patients [58]. Using high throughput proteome analysis (LC-MS/MS), Samanta et al [57] reported that 141 mitochondrial proteins were present in spermatozoa of varicocele patients, of which 22 DEPs were related to mitochondrial structure and function. Underexpression of the ATPase1A4, HSPA2, SPA17, and APOA1 proteins were associated with impaired mitochondrial function. Mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) proteins are regulated by the nuclear transcription factors and there exists a cross-talk between the same (Fig. 4). Also, mitochondrial proteins (NDUFS1, ACO2, OGDH, UQCRC2, and IDH3B) interact functionally with each other and are co-expressed in varicocele patients. Underexpression of Complex-III of the ETC (Cytochrome bc I complex subunit) in varicocele condition indicates hypoxia-induced oxidative stress [58]. Other ETC (NDUFS1: NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit, UQCRC2: ubiquinol-Cytochrome C Reductase Core Protein 2 and COX5B: cytochrome C oxidase subunit 5B) and testis-specific protein PDH have been suggested as potential non-invasive biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction in varicocele patients [57].

Fig. 4
Interaction between the differentially expressed proteins and transcriptional factors in varicocele patients with mitochondrial dysfunction. TOMM22: mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM22 homolog, COX5B: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5B, mitochondrial, NDUFS1: NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit, mitochondrial, IMMT: NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit, mitochondrial, UQCRC2: cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2, mitochondrial, PGAM5: serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PGAM5, mitochondrial, TAL1: T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia protein 1, ACAT1: acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial, ECHS1: enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial, ECH1: delta(3,5)-delta(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase, mitochondrial, LETM1: mitochondrial proton/calcium exchanger protein, IDH3B: isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit beta, mitochondrial, c-Src: proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, PRKAR1A: cAMP-dependent protein kinase type I-alpha regulatory subunit, PRKACA: cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit alpha, CISY: citrate synthase, mitochondrial, ACO2: aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial, IDH3A: isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit alpha, mitochondrial, HADHA: trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha, mitochondrial, ISOC2: isochorismatase domain-containing protein 2, PKC: protein kinase C, NRF2: nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NFE2)-related factor 2, GCR: glucocorticoid receptor, PPAR-β (Δ): peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta or delta, YY1: Yin Yang 1, VDR: vitamin D receptor, ATF: activating transcription factor, CREB: cAMP response element binding, OCT-3/4: octamer-binding transcription factor 3/4, AP-1: activator protein 1, SP1: specificity protein 1, ESR1: estrogen receptor 1, ERR1: steroid hormone receptor ERR1, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells.

Varicocele is encountered on the left side in 90% of unilateral varicocele cases [59]. A comparative proteomic study reported a total of 369 sperm proteins that are differentially expressed in fertile men and unilateral varicocele patients. The majority of these DEPs were involved in important cellular molecular functions including ion binding (44.85%), and oxidoreductase activity (13.65%); as well as biological processes such as small molecule metabolic process (43.73%), response to stress (32.87%), signal transduction (29.25%), and cellular protein modification process (20.33%) [60]. Moreover, altered expression of the sperm proteins impacted the molecular pathways, via PTM, free radical scavenging, protein ubiquitination, and mitochondrial dysfunction, which could then affect the normal physiological functions of spermatozoa. A profile of 29 proteins associated with reproductive functions (sperm maturation, motility, hyperactivation, capacitation, and acrosome reaction), which are essential for the fertilization process, were found to be altered in the spermatozoa of unilateral varicocele patients. Based on the coverage of peptides, nine proteins (CABYR: calcium binding tyrosine phosphorylation regulated, AKAP: A-Kinase anchoring protein 5, APOPA1: apolipoprotein A-I, SEMG1: semenogelin-1, ACR: acrosin, SPA17: sperm surface protein Sp17, RSPH1: radial spoke head 1 homolog, RSPH9: radial spoke head protein 9 homolog and DNAH17: dynein heavy chain 17) associated with the fertilization potential of spermatozoa were identified as potential biomarkers for unilateral varicocele patients [60].

Agarwal et al [61] demonstrated the differences in the sperm proteome profile of bilateral varicocele patients and fertile men. The sperm proteome profile was able to decipher the subcellular role of proteins responsible for infertility associated with bilateral varicocele. In total, 73 proteins were differentially expressed in these patients. Absence of APOA1, under expression of mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM22 homolog (TOM22) and over expression of protein-glutamine gamma-glutamyl transferase 4 (TGM4) were associated with the molecular pathological changes related particularly to oxidative stress and SDF [61]. Also, proteins linked with the reproductive function (such as ODF2: Outer dense fiber protein 2; TEKT3: Tektin-3; TCP11: T-complex protein 11 homolog; CLGN: Calmegin) were aberrantly expressed in bilateral varicocele patients, thus affecting the fertilization potential of the sperm. Differential expression of sperm proteins ENKUR: enkurin, SEMG1, SEMG2: semenogelin-1, SPAM1: sperm adhesion molecule 1 and CABYR are indicators of poor semen quality in bilateral varicocele patients [60].

Semen quality is more severely compromised in bilateral varicocele patients compared to that of unilateral varicocele patients. Comparative protein profiling was able to address the pathophysiology associated with the extensive damage caused by bilateral varicocele [60]. The 253 DEPs identified between the unilateral and bilateral varicocele were involved in metabolism, apoptosis and signal transduction pathways. Dysregulation of sperm functions (capacitation, hyperactivation, and acrosome reaction) and reproductive functions (zona pellucida binding and fertilization) in bilateral varicocele patients were more pronounced due to differential expression of proteins, such as GSTM3: glutathione S-transferase Mu 3, SPANX1: sperm protein associated with nucleus X chromosome, CYB5R2: cytochrome B5 reductase 2, CALGN: calmegin and PARK7 (also known as DJ-1 proteins) [60]. The majority of these DEPs (>50% of proteins) were involved in the acetylation process and suggest that the downregulation of proteasome complex proteins is a predisposing factor for increased DNA damage in bilateral varicocele patients [62]. Acetylation-associated proteins involved in fertilization and acrosome reaction (TALDO1: transaldolase 1, HIST1H2B: histone cluster 1 H2B family member B, GNPDA1: glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase 1), apoptosis and DNA damage (HSP90AB1: heat shock protein 90 alpha family class B member 1, PPP5C: protein phosphatase 5 catalytic subunit, RUVBL: RuvB-like proteins), mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress (SDHA: succinate dehydrogenase, PRDX1: peroxiredoxin 1 and GSHR: glutathione reductase) have been proposed as post-translational protein biomarkers in varicocele patients [62].

The list of potential sperm biomarkers in varicocele patients based on fertilization, motility and morphology, DNA damage, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction are presented in Table 1 [25, 26, 54, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67].

Table 1
Sperm and seminal plasma protein biomarkers in varicocele patients

VARICOCELE AND SEMINAL PLASMA PROTEOMICS

In addition to sperm proteins, the seminal plasma proteome also plays a key role in determining the fertilization capacity of the sperm [23]. The seminal plasma serves as a potential source for protein biomarkers, as the DEPs involved in the pathophysiology of male infertility can be used as predictive biomarkers for its diagnosis [17]. The first report on seminal plasma proteomics in adult varicocele patients using the 2D gel electrophoresis (2D SDS-PAGE) technique was published in 2012 [68]. The study reported of 20 proteins that were differentially expressed in the seminal plasma of cigarette smoking adult varicocele patients. Moreover, proteins involved in the inflammatory response, proteolysis and regulation of apoptosis, sperm maturation and sperm-oocyte fusion were dysregulated in these patients [68]. Nitric oxide metabolism and tetratricopeptide repeat domain-binding functions were also more enhanced in adult varicocele patients [24]. These alterations in the seminal plasma proteome mark the deleterious effects of varicocele on semen quality and the functional integrity of sperm in adult males.

Varicocele occurs with a prevalence of 6% to 26% in adolescents [69]. In adolescents with varicocele having poor semen quality, the seminal plasma proteins associated with normal physiological function of spermatozoa are differentially expressed. For example, proteins associated with sperm motility and capacitation such as SEMG I and PSA, were found to be overexpressed and underexpressed respectively in the seminal plasma of adolescent varicocele patients [25]. Belardin et al [26] reported that the proliferative or apoptotic equilibrium of seminal plasma is altered in varicocele patients. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) associated with the proliferative process was overexpressed, whereas deoxyribonuclease-1 (DNASE1) involved in the regulation of apoptosis was underexpressed in the seminal plasma of adolescents with varicocele [26]. Furthermore, proteomic analysis by the same group revealed that seminal plasma was enriched with immune response proteins leading to a chronic inflammatory reaction in adolescents with varicocele [26]. These changes reflect the alterations in testicular functions leading to decreased semen quality in adolescents with varicocele.

A recently published study on seminal plasma proteomics in varicocele patients discusses in detail the functional pathways affected in varicocele patients. A total of 486 proteins were detected in the varicocele patients. Proteins associated with molecular pathways such as response to oxidative stress (PRDX1 and PRDX2) and sperm-oocyte interaction (CCT4 and CCT8) are dysregulated in the seminal plasma of varicocele patients. PRDX2, HSPA2 and APOA2 were proposed as potential biomarkers to understand the molecular pathology associated with varicocele mediated male infertility [65]. Another proteomic report in seminal plasma demonstrated that inflammatory response pathways were dysregulated, especially interleukin 6 signaling and Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak-STAT) pathways, in bilateral varicocele patients [66].

A drastic change in the expression profile of proteins has been observed in the seminal plasma of post-varicocelectomy patients. The proteome profile of seminal plasma in post-varicocelectomy men revealed 38 proteins to be uniquely expressed. Molecular pathways such as response to oxidative stress, gluconeogenesis and protein stabilization were enriched in post-varicocelectomy patients. Overexpression of DJ-1: parkinsonism associated deglycase, S100-A9: S100 calcium binding protein A9, SOD: superoxide dismutase 1, ANXA1: annexin A1, G3P: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and MDH: malate dehydrogenase in seminal plasma could help retain the homeostasis post-varicocelectomy [24]. Decreased expression of negative elongation factor E (NELFE) indicates a decreased state of oxidative stress, whereas increased expression of transglutaminase-4 suggests (TGM4) that the sperm-binding activity was retained in post-varicocelectomy patients [25]. The same group of investigators evaluated the seminal plasma proteins in 25 varicocele patients before and after varicocelectomy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with area under curve of 84.5% (p=0.014) predicted the tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (TPP1) protein as a positive outcome predictor for varicocelectomy in patients. Expression of TPP1 protein had increased to three-folds in the seminal plasma of men with positive outcome of varicocelectomy when compared to patients that had failed to show any improvement in semen parameters post-varicocelectomy [47].

Several other proteomic studies have been conducted to identify noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of varicocele associated male infertility. Expression of apoptotic markers B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (BCL2) and BCL2-Associated X Protein (BAX) were decreased and increased, respectively, in the seminal plasma of varicocele patients. BAX has been negatively correlated with sperm concentration, motility and normal sperm morphology [67].

FUTURE OF PROTEOMICS

Rapid progress in the proteomic (LC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF) techniques over the last five years has geared the ‘omics’ research to validate the proteins as potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for male infertility. Initially, several challenges were faced in sperm and seminal plasma proteomics pertaining to the complexity of the sample, processing of sample for mass spectrometry analysis, quantification of proteins and identification of PTMs [70]. However, simplification of the proteomic techniques by employing protein enrichment strategies and targeted proteomic approach facilitated the detection of the low abundance proteins and PTMs (glycosylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation) effectively in sperm and seminal plasma.

One of the major limitations of sperm proteomic studies is the complexity of the semen sample which is highly heterogenous. The presence of abundant proteins in the seminal plasma (such as SMEGs) tend to mask the detection of other low abundant proteins which may have a vital role in the spermatozoa [24, 43]. To address these issues, better analytical and enrichment procedures must be adapted for accurate detection of low abundant proteins present in the semen sample [71, 72]. Apart from sperm and seminal plasma protein studies, the focus has currently shifted to understand the physiological function of the exosomes. In 2017, Yang et al [73] profiled the seminal exosomal proteins in fertile donors. Exosomal proteins were associated with protein metabolism, energy pathway and transport. Differential screening of exosomal proteins in infertile male patients may serve as a potential biomarker in assessing the functional status of exosomes in seminal plasma. Recently, we have identified the alterations in seminal plasma proteins associated with exosome functions in varicocele patients. Exosome-associated proteins ANXA2 and KIF5B may serve as potential protein biomarkers of exosomal dysfunction and exosome-mediated infertility in varicocele patients [74].

Proteomics is technology-driven field that rely on bioinformatic analysis. Advancement in computational tools and user compatible data analysis tools such as IPA, Metacore, Cytoscape, and Reactome make the interpretation of results more versatile and feasible. Implementation of these techniques into a clinical set up depends on the powerful meta-analysis of biomarker validation results. It is anticipated that the future of male infertility diagnostics and therapeutics depends on the effective integrated analysis of all the ‘omics’ (genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) data to identify accurate and reliable biomarkers for a specific infertility condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the advanced tests performed to determine oxidative stress and DNA fragmentation, molecular biomarkers can be promising in the non-invasive diagnosis of various pathologies associated with male infertility. Proteomics must be considered as a complementary ‘omics’ tool to investigate the biomarkers of male infertility. Although the proteomics result seems promising, validation of the biomarkers in larger sample sizes using western blot or ELISA will definitely strengthen the significance of these findings. In depth omics studies on seminal exosomes, can help in developing new diagnostics and therapeutic strategies for treating exosome dysfunction in infertile men with varicocele.

Notes

Conflict of Interest:The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author Contribution:

  • Conceptualization: all authors.

  • Data curation: MKPS.

  • Formal analysis: all authors.

  • Supervision: AA.

  • Writing–original draft: MKPS.

  • Writing–review & editing: all authors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Saradha Baskaran, PhD (USA) and Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, PhD (Malaysia) for review of our manuscript and offering helpful comments.

References

    1. Irvine DS. Epidemiology and aetiology of male infertility. Hum Reprod 1998;13 Suppl 1:33–44.
    1. Saypol DC. Varicocele. J Androl 1981;2:61–71.
    1. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993;59:613–616.
    1. Pastuszak AW, Wang R. Varicocele and testicular function. Asian J Androl 2015;17:659–667.
    1. Dada R, Gupta NP, Kucheria K. Spermatogenic arrest in men with testicular hyperthermia. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 2003 Suppl 1:235–243.
    1. Cho CL, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of varicocele and its association with reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation. Asian J Androl 2016;18:186–193.
    1. Agarwal A, Hamada A, Esteves SC. Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 1. Nat Rev Urol 2012;9:678–690.
    1. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2016;18:163–170.
    1. Damsgaard J, Joensen UN, Carlsen E, Erenpreiss J, Blomberg Jensen M, Matulevicius V, et al. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries. Eur Urol 2016;70:1019–1029.
    1. Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Conmar V, Mattila M, Vagnini LD, et al. Semen parameters in men with varicocele: DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging, mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis. JBRA Assist Reprod 2017;21:295–301.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
    1. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R. Oxidation-reduction potential measurement in ejaculated semen samples. In: Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R, editors. Andrological evaluation of male infertility: a laboratory guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 165-170.
    1. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R. Measurement of DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa by TUNEL Assay using bench top flow cytometer. In: Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R, editors. Andrological evaluation of male infertility: a laboratory guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 181-203.
    1. Evenson DP. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA(®)) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2016;169:56–75.
    1. Panner Selvam MK, Agarwal A. Update on the proteomics of male infertility: a systematic review. Arab J Urol 2017;16:103–112.
    1. Kovac JR, Pastuszak AW, Lamb DJ. The use of genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics in identifying biomarkers of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2013;99:998–1007.
    1. Bieniek JM, Drabovich AP, Lo KC. Seminal biomarkers for the evaluation of male infertility. Asian J Androl 2016;18:426–433.
    1. du Plessis SS, Kashou AH, Benjamin DJ, Yadav SP, Agarwal A. Proteomics: a subcellular look at spermatozoa. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011;9:36
    1. Samanta L, Swain N, Ayaz A, Venugopal V, Agarwal A. Post-translational modifications in sperm proteome: the chemistry of proteome diversifications in the pathophysiology of male factor infertility. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016;1860:1450–1465.
    1. Brohi RD, Huo LJ. Posttranslational modifications in spermatozoa and effects on male fertility and sperm viability. OMICS 2017;21:245–256.
    1. Xu W, Hu H, Wang Z, Chen X, Yang F, Zhu Z, et al. Proteomic characteristics of spermatozoa in normozoospermic patients with infertility. J Proteomics 2012;75:5426–5436.
    1. Bracke A, Peeters K, Punjabi U, Hoogewijs D, Dewilde S. A search for molecular mechanisms underlying male idiopathic infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36:327–339.
    1. Amann RP. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J Androl 1989;10:89–98.
    1. Camargo M, Intasqui Lopes P, Del Giudice PT, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, Andreoni C, et al. Unbiased label-free quantitative proteomic profiling and enriched proteomic pathways in seminal plasma of adult men before and after varicocelectomy. Hum Reprod 2013;28:33–46.
    1. Zylbersztejn DS, Andreoni C, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Borsari L, Souza GH, et al. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril 2013;99:92–98.
    1. Belardin LB, Del Giudice PT, Camargo M, Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Bertolla RP, et al. Alterations in the proliferative/apoptotic equilibrium in semen of adolescents with varicocele. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:1657–1664.
    1. Baker MA, Nixon B, Naumovski N, Aitken RJ. Proteomic insights into the maturation and capacitation of mammalian spermatozoa. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012;58:211–217.
    1. Duncan MW, Thompson HS. Proteomics of semen and its constituents. Proteomics Clin Appl 2007;1:861–875.
    1. Jodar M, Sendler E, Krawetz SA. The protein and transcript profiles of human semen. Cell Tissue Res 2016;363:85–96.
    1. Amaral A, Castillo J, Ramalho-Santos J, Oliva R. The combined human sperm proteome: cellular pathways and implications for basic and clinical science. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:40–62.
    1. Sharma R, Agarwal A. Spermatogenesis: an overview. In: Zini A, Agarwal A, editors. Sperm chromatin: biological and clinical applications in male infertility and assisted reproduction. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 19-44.
    1. Jodar M, Soler-Ventura A, Oliva R. Molecular Biology of Reproduction and Development Research Group. Semen proteomics and male infertility. J Proteomics 2017;162:125–134.
    1. Martínez-Heredia J, Estanyol JM, Ballescà JL, Oliva R. Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. Proteomics 2006;6:4356–4369.
    1. Johnston DS, Wooters J, Kopf GS, Qiu Y, Roberts KP. Analysis of the human sperm proteome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1061:190–202.
    1. Samanta L, Parida R, Dias TR, Agarwal A. The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16:41
    1. Pilch B, Mann M. Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma. Genome Biol 2006;7:R40
    1. Starita-Geribaldi M, Poggioli S, Zucchini M, Garin J, Chevallier D, Fenichel P, et al. Mapping of seminal plasma proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in men with normal and impaired spermatogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod 2001;7:715–722.
    1. Starita-Geribaldi M, Roux F, Garin J, Chevallier D, Fénichel P, Pointis G. Development of narrow immobilized pH gradients covering one pH unit for human seminal plasma proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2003;3:1611–1619.
    1. Drabovich AP, Dimitromanolakis A, Saraon P, Soosaipillai A, Batruch I, Mullen B, et al. Differential diagnosis of azoospermia with proteomic biomarkers ECM1 and TEX101 quantified in seminal plasma. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:212ra160
    1. Amaral A, Paiva C, Attardo Parrinello C, Estanyol JM, Ballescà JL, Ramalho-Santos J, et al. Identification of proteins involved in human sperm motility using high-throughput differential proteomics. J Proteome Res 2014;13:5670–5684.
    1. Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Du Plessis SS, Gopalan B, Willard B, et al. Proteomic analysis of seminal fluid from men exhibiting oxidative stress. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013;11:85
    1. Giacomini E, Ura B, Giolo E, Luppi S, Martinelli M, Garcia RC, et al. Comparative analysis of the seminal plasma proteomes of oligoasthenozoospermic and normozoospermic men. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:522–531.
    1. Intasqui P, Camargo M, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, et al. Unraveling the sperm proteome and post-genomic pathways associated with sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:1187–1202.
    1. Oliva R, De Mateo S, Castillo J, Azpiazu R, Oriola J, Ballescà JL. Methodological advances in sperm proteomics. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010;13:263–267.
    1. Ayaz A, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Arafa M, Elbardisi H, Cui Z. Impact of precise modulation of reactive oxygen species levels on spermatozoa proteins in infertile men. Clin Proteomics 2015;12:4
    1. Abdallah C, Dumas-Gaudot E, Renaut J, Sergeant K. Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance. Int J Plant Genomics 2012;2012:494572
    1. Camargo M, Intasqui P, Belardin LB, Antoniassi MP, Cardozo KHM, Carvalho VM, et al. Molecular pathways of varicocele and its repair - A paired labelled shotgun proteomics approach. J Proteomics 2019;196:22–32.
    1. Intasqui P, Camargo M, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation rate is associated with differential protein expression and enriched functions in human seminal plasma. BJU Int 2013;112:835–843.
    1. Oliva R, de Mateo S, Estanyol JM. Sperm cell proteomics. Proteomics 2009;9:1004–1017.
    1. Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Camargo M, Nichi M, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, et al. Differences in the seminal plasma proteome are associated with oxidative stress levels in men with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril 2015;104:292–301.
    1. Lan N, Montelione GT, Gerstein M. Ontologies for proteomics: towards a systematic definition of structure and function that scales to the genome level. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003;7:44–54.
    1. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Halabi J, Peng J, Vazquez-Levin M. Proteomics, oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:32–58.
    1. Hosseinifar H, Gourabi H, Salekdeh GH, Alikhani M, Mirshahvaladi S, Sabbaghian M, et al. Study of sperm protein profile in men with and without varicocele using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Urology 2013;81:293–300.
    1. Hosseinifar H, Sabbaghian M, Nasrabadi D, Modarresi T, Dizaj AV, Gourabi H, et al. Study of the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm proteins expression in patients with varicocele and poor sperm quality by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31:725–729.
    1. Swain N, Mohanty G, Samanta L, Intasqui P. Proteomics and male infertility. In: Agarwal A, Samanta L, Bertolla RP, Durairajanayagam D, Intasqui P, editors. Proteomics in human reproduction: biomakers for millennials. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 21-43.
    1. Smith R, Kaune H, Parodi D, Madariaga M, Rios R, Morales I, et al. Increased sperm DNA damage in patients with varicocele: relationship with seminal oxidative stress. Hum Reprod 2006;21:986–993.
    1. Samanta L, Agarwal A, Swain N, Sharma R, Gopalan B, Esteves SC, et al. Proteomic signatures of sperm mitochondria in varicocele: clinical use as biomarkers of varicocele associated infertility. J Urol 2018;200:414–422.
    1. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Samanta L, Durairajanayagam D, Sabanegh E. Proteomic signatures of infertile men with clinical varicocele and their validation studies reveal mitochondrial dysfunction leading to infertility. Asian J Androl 2016;18:282–291.
    1. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol 2011;60:796–808.
    1. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, Cui Z, Ayaz A, Gupta S, et al. Differential proteomic profiling of spermatozoal proteins of infertile men with unilateral or bilateral varicocele. Urology 2015;85:580–588.
    1. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, Cui Z, Ayaz A, Gupta S, et al. Spermatozoa protein alterations in infertile men with bilateral varicocele. Asian J Androl 2016;18:43–53.
    1. Selvam MP, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Willard BB, Gopalan B, Sabanegh ES. Differentially expressed proteins involved in acetylation of spermatozoa in infertile men with unilateral and bilateral varicocele. Fertil Steril 2017;108:e141
    1. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, Ayaz A, Cui Z, Willard B, et al. Major protein alterations in spermatozoa from infertile men with unilateral varicocele. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015;13:8
    1. Del Giudice PT, da Silva BF, Lo Turco EG, Fraietta R, Spaine DM, Santos LF, et al. Changes in the seminal plasma proteome of adolescents before and after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 2013;100:667–672.
    1. Panner Selvam MK, Agarwal A. Proteomic profiling of seminal plasma proteins in varicocele patients. World J Mens Health. 2019 [doi: 10.5534/wjmh.180118]
      [Epub].
    1. Panner Selvam MK, Agarwal A, Baskaran S. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma from bilateral varicocele patients indicates an oxidative state and increased inflammatory response. Asian J Androl 2019;21:544–550.
    1. Mostafa T, Rashed L, Nabil N, Amin R. Seminal BAX and BCL2 gene and protein expressions in infertile men with varicocele. Urology 2014;84:590–595.
    1. Fariello RM, Pariz JR, Spaine DM, Gozzo FC, Pilau EJ, Fraietta R, et al. Effect of smoking on the functional aspects of sperm and seminal plasma protein profiles in patients with varicocele. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3140–3149.
    1. Hamada A, Esteves S, Agarwal A. Definitions and epidemiology. In: Hamada A, Esteves S, Agarwal A, editors. Varicocele and male infertility: current concepts, controversies and consensus. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 1-3.
    1. Mohanty G, Samanta L. Challenges of proteomic studies in human reproduction. In: Agarwal A, Samanta L, Bertolla RP, Durairajanayagam D, Intasqui P, editors. Proteomics in human reproduction: biomakers for millennials. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 71-82.
    1. Wang K, Huang C, Nice E. Recent advances in proteomics: towards the human proteome. Biomed Chromatogr 2014;28:848–857.
    1. Fuhrer T, Zamboni N. High-throughput discovery metabolomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015;31:73–78.
    1. Yang C, Guo WB, Zhang WS, Bian J, Yang JK, Zhou QZ, et al. Comprehensive proteomics analysis of exosomes derived from human seminal plasma. Andrology 2017;5:1007–1015.
    1. Panner Selvam MK, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Samanta L, Gupta S, Dias TR, et al. Protein fingerprinting of seminal plasma reveals dysregulation of exosome-associated proteins in infertile men with unilateral varicocele. World J Mens Health. 2019 [doi: 10.5534/wjmh.180108]
      [Epub].

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 4

Tables

1 / 1

PERMALINK