Are Canadian urology residency programs fulfilling the Royal College expectations?: A survey of graduated chief residents

Authors

  • Bassel G. Bachir McGill University
  • Armen G. Aprikian
  • Wassim Kassouf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1339

Keywords:

Chief residents, urology, Royal College, training, residency

Abstract

Introduction: We assess outgoing Canadian urology chief residents’ well-being, their satisfaction with their surgical training, and their proficiency in surgical procedures throughout their residency program.

Methods: In 2012 an anonymous survey was sent by email to all 29 graduated urology chief residents across Canada. The survey included a list of all urologic surgical procedures listed by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC). According to the A/B/C classification used to assess competence in these procedures (A most competent, C least competent), we asked chief residents to self-classify their competence with regards to each procedure and we compared the final results to the current RCPSC classification.

Results: The overall response rate among chief residents surveyed was 97%. An overwhelming majority (96.4%) of residents agreed that the residency program has affected their overall well-being, as well as their relationships with their families and/or partners (67.8%). Overall, 85.7% agreed that research was an integral part of the residency program and 78.6% have enrolled in a fellowship program post-graduation. Respondents believed that they have received the least adequate training in robotic surgery (89.3%), followed by female urology (67.8%), andrology/sexual medicine/infertility (67.8%), and reconstructive urology (61.4%). Interestingly, in several of the 42 surgical procedures classified as category A by the RCPSC, a significant percentage of residents felt that their proficiency was not category A, including repair of urinary fistulae (82.1%), pediatric indirect hernia repair and meatal repair for glanular hypospadias (67.9%), open pyeloplasty (64.3%), anteriorpelvic exenteration (61.6%), open varicocelectomy (60.7%) and radical cystoprostatectomy (33.3%). Furthermore, all respondents (100%) believed they were deficient in at least 1 of the 42 category A procedures, while 53.6 % believed they were deficient in at least 10 of the 42 procedures.

Conclusions: Most residents agree that their residency program has affected their overall well-being as well as their relationships with their families and/or partners. There is also a clear deficiency in what outgoing residents perceive they have achieved and what the RCPSC mandates. Future work should concentrate on addressing this discrepancy to assure that training and RCPSC expectations are better aligned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bassel G. Bachir, McGill University

Research Fellow

Department of Surgery, division of Urology

Downloads

Published

2014-04-14

How to Cite

Bachir, B. G., Aprikian, A. G., & Kassouf, W. (2014). Are Canadian urology residency programs fulfilling the Royal College expectations?: A survey of graduated chief residents. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 8(3-4), 109–15. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1339

Issue

Section

Original Research